Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Wesley S Way Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$29k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Recreation & Sports$83kHuman Services$36kPhilanthropy$35kEducation$24kYouth Development$24kPublic Safety & Disaster$15kFood & Nutrition$11kCommunity Improvement$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$3,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$112k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Donors Choose$3,692
Outer Banks Womans Club$3,013
Individual grant recipient$3,000
YMCA of Greater Nashua$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Boys and Girls Club of Greater Nashua$3,000
Salvation Army$3,000
Camp Allen$2,098
Boys and Girls Club - GreaterNashua$1,919
NH Food Bank$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Green Acres Elementary School$842
Green Acres Elementary$430
Bartlett Elementary School$350
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%NH Food Bank: $3k → 7%NH Food Bank: $1k → 7%YMCA of Greater Nashua: $3k → 7%YMCA of Greater Nashua: $2k → 7%Marguerite's Place: $1k → 7%Marguerite's Place: $980 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 15% of Wesley S Way Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 79% of the giving stays in NH; read by stated purpose it is 81% — more of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Wesley S Way Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$178k · 17 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
13

Total granted

$178k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
0%

Still filing today

59%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsEducationFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    Boys & Girls Club of Greater Nashua Inc
    2× · 2024–2025 · $10k · revenue +18%
  • CA
    CAMP ALLEN INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $5k · revenue +408%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL AND NORTHERN NH INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $5k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • SC
    SERVICE CREDIT UNION
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue 0%
  • LT
    LONDONDERRY TRAILWAYS
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -48%
  • PP
    PLAYGROUND PROJECT CORP
    one grant, 2024 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bank of New Hampshire Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
2
Boy Scouts of America 330 Daniel Webster Council Inc

The corporation shall promote, within the territory covered by the charter from time-to-time granted by the boy scouts of america and in accordance with the congressional charter, bylaws, and rules and regulations of the boy scouts of…

Youth Development
3
Boys' & Girls' Club of New Britain Inc

Educational and recreational activities for youth.

Youth Development
4
Boys and Girls Club of Northeast Mississippi Inc

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those from disadvantaged circumstances, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible, and caring citizens.

5
Boys & Girls Club of Greater Billerica Inc

To enable all young people, especially those that need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens.

Youth Development
6
Ymca of the North Shore Inc

Our YMCA welcomes all. We strengthen communities, educate and nurture children, and promote healthy living in spirit, mind and body. Our strategic goals include providing youth and teen skill development, reversing the obesity epidemic,…

Human Services
7
Keene Young Men's Christian Association

The Keene Family YMCA serves all people through programs and services that build spirit, mind and body with a focus on youth development, healthy living and social responsibility. Our cause is to strengthen the foundation of our community.…

Human Services
8
New Hampshire Children's Health Foundation
Health
9
New Hampshire Historical Society

To educate a diverse public about the significance of New Hampshire's past and its relationship to our lives today. To this end, the Society collects, preserves, and interprets material pertaining to New Hampshire history.

Arts & Culture
10
Girl Scouts of Eastern Massachusetts Inc

Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence and character, who make the world a better place.

Youth Development
11
Boys and Girls Club of Brattleboro Inc

To inspire and enable all young people to realize their full potential productive, responsible and caring citizens.

Youth Development
12
New Hampshire Center for Nonprofits

The new hampshire center for nonprofits strengthens and gives voice to the state's nonprofit sector by providing leadership development programs, facilitating collaboration, and offering learning opportunities for nonprofit leaders, staff,…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Clubs of Central and Northern Nh Inc and the most unlike its peers is Londonderry Trailways. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Green Acres Elementary School — $67,011 · OtherGreen Acres Elementary SchoolTHE SALVATION ARMY — $14,368 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYDare County Health Human Services — $9,335 · OtherDare County Health Human ServicesOUTER BANKS WOMANS CLUB — $8,831 · OtherOUTER BANKS WOMANS CLUBIndividual grant recipient — $8,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $5,500 · OtherSERVICE CREDIT UNION — $5,000 · OtherPLAYGROUND PROJECT CORP — $5,000 · Other+15 more — $13,745 · Other+15 moreNew Hampshire Charitable Foundation — $35,000 · PhilanthropyNew Hampshire Ch…Boys & Girls Club of Greater Nashua Inc — $10,077 · Youth DevelopmentBoys & Gi…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL AND NORTHERN NH INC — $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GI…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER MANCHESTER — $4,500 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GI…DONORSCHOOSEORG — $15,338 · EducationYoung Men's Christian Association of Greater Nashua — $5,000 · Human ServicesNew Hampshire Catholic Charities — $3,500 · Human ServicesMARGUERITE'S PLACE INC — $2,230 · Human ServicesCAMP ALLEN INC — $5,063 · Recreation & SportsLONDONDERRY TRAILWAYS — $5,000 · Recreation & SportsBEACH FOOD PANTRY INC — $7,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$137,290Philanthropy$35,000Youth Development$19,577Education$15,338Human Services$10,730Recreation & Sports$10,063Food & Nutrition$7,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNew Hampshire Charitable Foundation — $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG — $15,338 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of Greater Nashua Inc — $10,077 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOUTER BANKS WOMANS CLUB — $8,831 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetBEACH FOOD PANTRY INC — $7,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCAMP ALLEN INC — $5,063 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSERVICE CREDIT UNION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL AND NORTHERN NH INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Greater Nashua — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLONDONDERRY TRAILWAYS — $5,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER MANCHESTER — $4,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNew Hampshire Catholic Charities — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARGUERITE'S PLACE INC — $2,230 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds New Hampshire Charitable Foundation
  • Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG
  • Who funds Boys & Girls Club of Greater Nashua Inc
  • Who funds OUTER BANKS WOMANS CLUB
  • Who funds BEACH FOOD PANTRY INC
  • Who funds CAMP ALLEN INC
  • Who funds SERVICE CREDIT UNION
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL AND NORTHERN NH INC
  • Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Nashua
  • Who funds LONDONDERRY TRAILWAYS
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER MANCHESTER
  • Who funds New Hampshire Catholic Charities
  • Who funds MARGUERITE'S PLACE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Madelaine G Vonweber Trust Todd Fahey & William Tucker Co-TrusteesNH17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Madelaine G Vonweber Trust Todd Fahey & William Tucker Co-Trustees · New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Td Charitable Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · Tamposi Foundation · John P Stabile Family Foundation · The Barker Foundation Inc · Merrimack County Savings Bank Fdtn · Ann de Nicola Tuw · The McIninch Foundation · Samuel P Hunt Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Wesley S Way Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph