Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wells Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8.0M
Granted FY2022
2
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$7.0M
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

88% of Wells Family Charitable Foundation’s FY2022 grant dollars went to The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

0
’17
0
’18
0
’19
2
’20
3
’21
0
’22

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Education$7.0MPhilanthropy$1.0MArts & Culture$555kAnimals$206kHealth$98kCivil Rights$49kHuman Services$13kInternational$10kOther$0
02FY2022 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$7,000,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Leland Stanford Junior University$7,000,000
MPTF$1,000,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 16% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Leland Stanford Junior University: $7.0M → 8%SEE ATTACHMENT: $809k → 10%GREATER LOS ANGELES ZOO ASSOCIATION: $189k → 14%SEE ATTACHMENT: $327k → 10%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES: $23k → 14%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES: $16k → 14%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES: $14k → 14%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES: $3k → 14%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES: $87 → 14%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES: $43 → 14%MPTF: $1.0M → 14%CALARTS: $40k → 14%LA PHILHARMONIC ASSOCATION: $189k → 14%LA PHILHARMONIC ASSOCATION: $25k → 14%BHHS ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $500 → 14%LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

32%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$634k · 12 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2022, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
24

Total granted

$634k
$374k

Still filing today

0%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22
EducationAnimalsHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LP
    LA PHILHARMONIC ASSOCATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $214k
  • WA
    Wallis Annenberg Center Performing Arts
    2× · 2017–2018 · $159k
  • C
    CALARTS
    3× · 2017–2021 · $130k

Funded once

  • GL
    GREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2020 · $189k · revenue +19%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Los Angelesgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $56k · revenue +27%
  • FO
    Friends of Malibu Urgent Care Center
    one grant, 2018 · $40k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/6
Grantees still filing
5/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $7,000,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY+2 more: $1,500 · EducationMPTF: $1,000,000 · OtherMPTFLA PHILHARMONIC ASSOCATION: $213,867 · OtherLA PHILHARMONIC ASSOCA…Wallis Annenberg Center Performing Arts: $158,800 · OtherWallis Annenberg Cente…CALARTS: $130,000 · OtherCALARTS+28 more: $258,245 · Other+28 moreGREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION: $188,867 · AnimalsChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $56,292 · HealthBig Sur Fiddle Camp: $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Education$7,001,500Other$1,760,912Animals$188,867Health$56,292Arts & Culture$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $7,000,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION: $188,867 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $56,292 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBig Sur Fiddle Camp: $1,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetTHE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBHHS ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds Big Sur Fiddle Camp ↗
  • Who funds THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds BHHS ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wells Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wells Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wells Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph