Skip to content

· Private foundation

Weissinger V Ajw T W

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$32kReligion$32kHealth$32kArts & Culture$16kPhilanthropy$16kHousing & Shelter$16kPublic Safety & Disaster$16kHuman Services$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,100
Median grant
4
States reached
$725k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOUNDATION FOR DELAWARE COUNTY$2,100
MARPLE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$2,100
THE SALVATION ARMY$2,100
PENN PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL CENTER$2,100
UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE$2,100
DELAWARE COUNTY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$2,100
THE AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS$2,100
TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH$2,100
Individual grant recipient$2,100
SIMPSON HOUSE$2,100
FRIENDS OF THE GRANGE INC$2,100
HUMANGOOD PENNSYLVANIA$2,100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%THE AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $2k → 14%THE AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $2k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%PHILADELPHIA PRESBYTERY HOMES INC: $5k → 7%PHILADELPHIA PRESBYTERY HOMES INC: $3k → 7%PHILADELPHIA PRESBYTERY HOMES INC: $2k → 7%HUMANGOOD PENNSYLVANIA: $2k → 7%PHILADELPHIA PRESBYTERY HOMES INC: $2k → 7%PHILADELPHIA PRESBYTERY HOMES INC: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$173k · 11 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
0

Total granted

$173k
$0

Still filing today

64%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PM
    PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL CENTER OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM
    6× · 2018–2025 · $16k · revenue +81%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE GRANGE INC
    6× · 2018–2025 · $16k · revenue +52%
  • UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE
    6× · 2018–2025 · $16k · revenue +29%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

    The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

    Education
    2
    Upmc Pinnacle Hospitals

    Upmc pinnacle hospitals mission as a charitable organization is dedicatied to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all persons of the central pennsylvania area.

    Health
    3
    Drexel University

    Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

    Education
    4
    Upmc Group

    Healthcare, education, and research

    —
    5
    Pennsylvania Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania Health System

    Provision of charitable healthcare services

    Health
    6
    The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

    The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

    Health
    7
    Highmark Health Group

    Working as an integrated system within highmark health, employees at all of ahn's care sites, including hospitals, health + wellness pavilions, primary and specialty care offices and more, are committed to improving health and promoting…

    —
    8
    Holy Redeemer Health System

    As a catholic health system, rooted in the tradition of the sisters of the holy redeemer, we care, comfort and heal, following the example of jesus, proclaiming the hope god offers in the midst of human struggle.

    Health
    9
    Thomas Jefferson University

    Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

    Education
    10
    Delaware Valley University

    See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

    —
    11
    Upmc Carlisle

    Upmc carlisle's mission is to serve the community by providing access to outstanding patient care and to shape tomorrow's health care system through clinical and technological innovation, research and education.

    Health
    12
    Reading Hospital

    Website: www.towerhealth.org/locations/reading-hospital the mission of reading hospital is to provide compassionate, accessible, high-quality, cost-effective healthcare to the community; to promote health; to education healthcare…

    Health
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Delaware; the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Grange Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    8/8
    Grantees still filing
    6/8
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $15,790 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF DELAWAREMARPLE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $15,789 · OtherMARPLE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $15,789 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $15,789 · OtherTRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCHTHE SALVATION ARMY: $15,729 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYPRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL CENTER OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM: $15,790 · HealthPRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL CENTER …FOUNDATION FOR DELAWARE COUNTY: $15,789 · HealthFOUNDATION FOR DELAWARE COUN…SIMPSON HOUSE INC: $15,729 · HealthSIMPSON HOUSE INCHUMANGOOD PENNSYLVANIA: $15,729 · Human ServicesHUMANGOOD PENNSYLV…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $15,729 · Human ServicesAmerican National …FRIENDS OF THE GRANGE INC: $15,790 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS O…DELAWARE COUNTY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL SOCIETY: $15,789 · EducationDELAWARE …
    Other$78,886Health$47,308Human Services$31,458Arts & Culture$15,790Education$15,789

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL CENTER OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM: $15,790 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE GRANGE INC: $15,790 over 6y, 7.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $15,790 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDELAWARE COUNTY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL SOCIETY: $15,789 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR DELAWARE COUNTY: $15,789 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSIMPSON HOUSE INC: $15,729 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANGOOD PENNSYLVANIA: $15,729 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $15,729 over 6y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL CENTER OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
    • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE GRANGE INC ↗
    • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE ↗
    • Who funds DELAWARE COUNTY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL SOCIETY ↗
    • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR DELAWARE COUNTY ↗
    • Who funds SIMPSON HOUSE INC ↗
    • Who funds HUMANGOOD PENNSYLVANIA ↗
    • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Weissinger V Ajw T W funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Weissinger V Ajw T W. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
    • University of Delaware: 30% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Weissinger V Ajw T W’s filings →

    More from the funding graph