How much did WE GIVE BACK FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 50% of WE GIVE BACK FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2021

—

2022

animalautismbroward

2023

educationyounglivingadvocacylivesenhancefull potential

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$3,295

Median grant

States reached

$9k

Total assets

Largest grants

AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION$3,295

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 26% of WE GIVE BACK FOUNDATION INC’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

WE GIVE BACK FOUNDATION INClessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address · 26% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

21%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$21k · 4 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against +49% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$21k

$77k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%

+49%

Still filing today

50%

33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthInternationalPublic BenefitEnvironmentAnimalsRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

AC
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY
2× · 2022–2023 · $9k
HS
HUMANE SOCIETY OF BROWARD COUNTY
2× · 2022–2023 · $6k · revenue +51%
SC
SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES
2× · 2022–2023 · $5k

Funded once

AF
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOMgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +206%
UO
UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII
one grant, 2023 · $10k
AS
AUTISM SPEAKS
one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -31%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Bioflorida Inc

Bioflorida is the voice of florida's life sciences industry, representing 8,600 establishments and research organizations in the biopharmaceutical, medical technology, and digital health sectors that collectively employ 107,000 floridians.

—

Nami Florida Inc

Helping to improve the quality of life for individuals and their families affected by mental illness through education, training, information, referral, advocacy and government relations.

—

Easter Seals South Florida Inc

Provide programs and services that support and strengthen families livingwith disability in miami dade and broward counties.

Health

Special Olympics Florida Foundation Inc

Supporting organization to Special Olympics Florida, Inc. To receive, hold, manage and invest funds to benefit Special Olympics Florida, Inc.

Recreation & Sports

Abilities Inc of Florida

To facilitate services for people with disabilities to build more inclusive communities.

Employment

Friends of South Florida Autism Inc

Provides support to South Florida Autism Center, SFACS Real Estate, South Florida Autism Charter School, and the Villages of South Florida Autism so that they may fulfill their missions of assisting individuals diagnosed with autism who…

Health

Leadership Broward Foundation Inc

Our mission is to develop and inspire individuals to serve our community. LBF promotes, develops and delivers leadership training programs that build community

Philanthropy

OneReef Worldwide Stewardship

Partner with island communities to combine traditional stewardship and modern resources to protect coral reefs.

Animals

South Florida Autism Center Inc

South Florida Autism Center is committed to serving the entire demographic of individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) residing in South Florida with opportunities that address all their needs on one campus offering early…

Human Services

Friendship Circle of North Broward and South Palm Beach Inc

The Friendship Circle provides assistance and support to the families of children with special needs.

Human Services

Disability Rights Florida Inc

Disability rights florida, inc.'s expressed mission is to advance the dignity, equality, selfdetermination and expressed choices of individuals with disabilities. disability rights florida, inc. promotes, expands, protects and seeks to…

Civil Rights

Pathway Homes of Florida Inc

The organization is dedicated to providing case management and housing location services for homeless and other adults with mental illness and co-occurring disabilities.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Autism Speaks Inc and the most unlike its peers is One Tree Planted Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

06the grantee network

11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

11/11

Grantees still filing

9/11

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$52,164International$25,000Health$11,795Animals$6,100Recreation & Sports$2,500Public Benefit$2,000Human Services$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation WE GIVE BACK FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

7get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: HONOR FLIGHT SOUTH FLORIDA INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~25 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 462939611 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on HONOR FLIGHT SOUTH FLORIDA INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 25 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 1% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to We Give Back Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to We Give Back Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

WE GIVE BACK FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to We Give Back Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

WE GIVE BACK FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to We Give Back Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph