Skip to content

· Private foundation

Waynesboro Beneficial Fund Association

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$33k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$33k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$167kHuman Services$85kArts & Culture$57kCommunity Improvement$42kAnimals$38kReligion$35kHealth$35kPhilanthropy$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$33,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$717k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$33,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%The Institute: $20k → 9%Waynesboro New Hope Shelter: $10k → 9%Waynesboro New Hope Shelter: $600 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$495k · 26 repeat orgs$391k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
24

Total granted

$495k
$391k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+45%

Still filing today

38%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    ANTIETAM HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $38k · revenue +30%
  • WH
    WAYNESBORO HOSPITAL
    6× · 2017–2022 · $26k · revenue +72%
  • WE
    WAYNESBORO EARLY LEARNING CENTER
    2× · 2018–2020 · $25k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $271k
  • WT
    Waynesboro Theatre
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • TI
    THE INSTITUTEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +45%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Old Waynesborough Commission Inc

Public display of historical objects and buildings. Park with walking trails.

Arts & Culture
2
Waynesboro Heritage Foundation Inc

To provide the community of waynesboro a viable place where its history can be preserved and celebrated for generations to come.

Arts & Culture
3
Wayland Historical Society Inc

To collect and preserve historical items

Arts & Culture
4
Wesleyville Hose Company No 1

Provide Firefighting and ambulance service to Wesleville Borough

—
5
Wayne County Historical Society

To preserve and share local history

—
6
Wayne County Public Library Inc

Public lending library

—
7
Wayne County Historical Society of Ohio

The wayne county historical society is dedicated to collecting, preserving, and interpreting the history of wayne county.

—
8
Westborough Historical Society

To study, educate, collect and preserve historical records and artifacts for the town of Westborough, MA

—
9
Hunterdon County Historical Society

Preserve County History

Arts & Culture
10
Westmoreland County Museum & Library Inc

Preservation and promotion of the history, traditions, and culture of westmoreland county, virginia and preservation of historical records of the county.

—
11
Wayne County Humane Society

Finding committed, permanent homes for companion animals in our community; measurably reducing companion animal overpopulation; educating and promoting humane values.

Animals
12
Wayne Historical Preservation Society

To record, preserve and display historical records and artifacts from the Village of Wayne, and to support other publicly-supported historical societies located in the geographical area known as Fox Valley in Illinois.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Waynesboro Community & Human Services in; the most unlike its peers is Waynesboro Community Theatre Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $271,064 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $156,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWaynesboro Area School District: $42,000 · OtherWaynesboro Area School DistrictWaynesbor Area Business Education C: $30,000 · Other+38 more: $270,004 · Other+38 moreANTIETAM HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $37,500 · AnimalsTHE INSTITUTE: $20,000 · Human ServicesWAYNESBORO NEW HOPE SHELTER INC: $10,700 · Human ServicesWAYNESBORO HOSPITAL: $26,356 · HealthMAINSTREET WAYNESBORO INC: $10,500 · Community ImprovementGIRL SCOUTS IN THE HEART OF PA: $5,855 · Youth DevelopmentWaynesboro Community Theatre Project Inc: $3,000 · Arts & CultureWaynesboro Historical Society: $2,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$769,768Animals$37,500Human Services$30,700Health$26,356Community Improvement$10,500Youth Development$5,855Arts & Culture$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANTIETAM HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $37,500 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetWAYNESBORO HOSPITAL: $26,356 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWAYNESBORO EARLY LEARNING CENTER: $25,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE: $20,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetGreen Hill Cemetery Association: $15,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetWaynesboro Community Concert Assoc: $14,000 over 6y, 7.6% of budgetWAYNESBORO NEW HOPE SHELTER INC: $10,700 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetMAINSTREET WAYNESBORO INC: $10,500 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS IN THE HEART OF PA: $5,855 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPen Mar Youth League Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetAmerican Legion Post 15: $3,584 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetWaynesboro Community Theatre Project Inc: $3,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetWaynesboro Historical Society: $2,500 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetWAYNESBORO COMMUNITY & HUMAN SERVICES IN: $1,200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALEXANDER HAMILTON MEMORIAL FREE LIBRARY: $1,187 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNicodemus Center for Ceramic Studies Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ANTIETAM HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds WAYNESBORO HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds WAYNESBORO EARLY LEARNING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Green Hill Cemetery Association ↗
  • Who funds Waynesboro Community Concert Assoc ↗
  • Who funds WAYNESBORO NEW HOPE SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MAINSTREET WAYNESBORO INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS IN THE HEART OF PA ↗
  • Who funds Pen Mar Youth League Inc ↗
  • Who funds American Legion Post 15 ↗
  • Who funds Waynesboro Community Theatre Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds Waynesboro Historical Society ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Foundation for Enhancing CommunitiesPA21.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Foundation for Enhancing Communities · Meehan-Holtz Charity Ta · Lora Jean Greenawalt and Gilbert Lee Greenawa · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Waynesboro Beneficial Fund Association funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Waynesboro Beneficial Fund Association. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Waynesboro Beneficial Fund Association?

    Find your warmest path to Waynesboro Beneficial Fund Association through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Waynesboro Beneficial Fund Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph