Skip to content

· Public charity

Washington County Mental Health Authority

The organization was formed to manage and coordinate the publicly funded mental health services and to promote full community participation in the planning and delivery of mental health services in washington county,maryland.

$3.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$14MScience & Tech$16k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $2,668,278, the rows itemized in this filing. The $3,053,207 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $384,929 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k3 grants · $238k
  • $250k+3 grants · $2.4M
$629,082
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WAY STATION INCSHEPPARD PRATT$1,081,503
POTOMAC COMMUNITY SERVICES$719,716
OFFICE OF CONSUMER ADVOCATES$629,082
PRIMECARE MEDICAL$100,735
WASHINGTON COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT$68,621
WASHINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES$68,621
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $4.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 1% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%WAY STATION INCSHEPPARD PRATT: $1.1M → 6%WAY STATION INCSHEPPARD PRATT: $1.1M → 6%WAY STATION INC: $508k → 6%WAY STATION INC: $436k → 6%WAY STATION INC: $433k → 6%WAY STATION INC: $426k → 6%WAY STATION INC: $423k → 6%WAY STATION INC: $368k → 6%THE ARC OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC: $11k → 12%THE ARC OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC: $10k → 12%THE ARC OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC: $10k → 12%THE ARC OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC: $7k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14M · 13 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
1

Total granted

$14M
$27k

Still filing today

46%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WS
    WAY STATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $4.7M · revenue +50%
  • PC
    POTOMAC CASE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.1M · revenue +67%
  • WC
    WASHINGTON COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING INC/AREA AGENCY ON AGING
    4× · 2017–2020 · $108k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • DC
    DR CORRIENE KURZ
    one grant, 2017 · $27k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
5/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Office Of Consumer Advocates Inc: $4,510,579 · HealthOffice Of Consumer Advocates IncPOTOMAC CASE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC: $3,119,116 · HealthPOTOMAC CASE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC+1 more: $80,245 · HealthWAY STATION INC: $4,729,719 · Human ServicesWAY STATION INC+1 more: $36,928 · Human ServicesWASHINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES: $613,940 · OtherWASHINGTON COUN…INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY CENTERED: $547,282 · OtherINSTITUTE FOR F…PRIMECARE MEDICAL: $395,855 · OtherPRIMECARE MEDIC…CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS LLC: $176,000 · OtherCORRECT CARE SO…WASHINGTON COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING INC/AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $108,247 · OtherWASHINGTON COUN…+4 more: $146,631 · Other+4 more
Health$7,709,940Human Services$4,766,647Other$1,987,955

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWAY STATION INC: $4,729,719 over 9y, 2.4% of budgetOffice Of Consumer Advocates Inc: $4,510,579 over 9y, 93% of budgetPOTOMAC CASE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC: $3,119,116 over 9y, 7.2% of budgetWASHINGTON COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING INC/AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $108,247 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetMARYLAND COALITION OF FAMILIES INC: $80,245 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetARC OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC: $36,928 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WAY STATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Office Of Consumer Advocates Inc ↗
  • Who funds POTOMAC CASE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING INC/AREA AGENCY ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds MARYLAND COALITION OF FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds ARC OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Washington County Maryland IncMD13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Washington County Maryland Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Washington County Mental Health Authority funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Washington County Mental Health Authority. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Washington County Commission On Aging Inc/Area Agency On Aging: 19% of income from government
  • Potomac Case Management Services Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Way Station Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $3.2M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Washington County Mental Health Authority’s filings →

More from the funding graph