Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Blueprint Washington Inc

To support blueprint's mission to provide long-term affordable facilities solutions to increase the availability of high quality charter schools for underserved students in washington.

$1.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20182024.

Education$13MOther$790k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $17k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $320k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.5M
$220,730
Median grant
2
States reached
$95M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BLUEPRINT$1,506,450
PINNACLES PREP CHARTER SCHOOL$220,730
PULLMAN COMMUNITY MONTESSORI$99,174
CATALYST PUBLIC SCHOOLS$17,118
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PACIFIC CHARTER SCHOOL DEVELO: $2.0M → 14%CASCADE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $123k → 9%ROOTED SCHOOL VANCOUVER: $160k → 9%SOAR ACADEMY: $55k → 9%PINNACLES PREP CHARTER SCHOOL: $221k → 9%CATALYST PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $187k → 10%WHATCOM INTERGENERATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL: $80k → 12%PRIDE PREP SCHOOLS: $100k → 12%WILLOW PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $249k → 13%PULLMAN COMMUNITY MONTESSORI: $99k → 20%PACIFIC CHARTER SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT: $2.0M → 14%CASCADE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $67k → 9%ROOTED SCHOOL VANCOUVER: $153k → 9%SOAR ACADEMY: $18k → 9%PINNACLES PREP CHARTER SCHOOL: $102k → 9%CATALYST PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $63k → 10%WHATCOM INTERGENRATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL: $61k → 12%SPOKANE INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY: $358k → 12%PULLMAN COMMUNITY MONTESSORI: $20k → 20%PACIFIC CHARTER SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT: $1.6M → 14%ASHE PREPARATORY: $35k → 9%PINNACLES PREP CHARTER SCHOOL: $40k → 9%CATALYST PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $17k → 10%WHATCOM INTERGENERATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL: $20k → 12%SPOKANE INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY: $130k → 12%BLUEPRINT: $1.5M → 14%CASCADE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $100k → 9%PINNACLES PREP CHARTER SCHOOL: $20k → 9%SPOKANE INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY: $9k → 12%PACIFIC CHARTER SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT: $1.1M → 14%CASCADE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $35k → 9%PACIFIC CHARTER SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT: $924k → 14%IMPACT PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $442k → 9%PACIFIC CHARTER SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT: $786k → 14%IMPACT PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $223k → 9%IMPACT PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $165k → 9%IMPACT PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $130k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$13M · 10 repeat orgs$384k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +207% since the first grant, against -100% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
3

Total granted

$13M
$384k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+207%
-100%

Still filing today

90%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IP
    Impact Public Schools
    4× · 2020–2023 · $960k · revenue +295%
  • SI
    Spokane International Academy
    3× · 2018–2020 · $497k · revenue +181%
  • PP
    PINNACLES PREP CHARTER SCHOOL
    4× · 2020–2024 · $383k · revenue +813%

Funded once

  • IS
    INNOVATION SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2018 · $249k · revenue -100%
  • IS
    Innovation Spokane Schools
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue -32%
  • AP
    Ashe Preparatory Academy
    one grant, 2019 · $35k · revenue -100%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Puget Sound Community School

Founded in 1994, PSCS is a small, independent middle and high school located in the Chinatown/International District of downtown Seattle. PSCS is committed to co-creating a brave space for community-centered education, critical curriculum,…

2
Pacific Charter Institute Inc

The mission of PCI is to provide students an individualized educational program based on the academic triad. The teacher parent and student work together to develop a unique program specific to the students needs. Our goal is to equip each…

Education
3
Pocatello Community Charter School

Public Education.

Education
4
Cascades Academy of Central Oregon

Cascades academy is an engaged, vibrant community that weaves challenging academics with experiential learning to inspire socially responsible individuals ready for a diverse and changing world.

Education
5
Spruce Street School

Spruce Street School is a nurturing educational community that instills in a broad range of children the social, emotional, and intellectual skills for lifelong participation in a diverse society. We offer kindergarten through fifth grade…

Education
6
Idaho Science & Technology Charter

Public Education.

Education
7
Falcon Ridge Public Charter School

Public Education.

Education
8
Sheridan Allprep Academy

A public charter school that allows students to complete an accredited teacher-supervised K-12 education and earn a high school diploma that meets Oregon State Graduation requirements.

Education
9
Princeton International School of Mathematics and Science Inc

The purpose of the school is to promote, advance and sponsor charitable and educational activities.

Education
10
Rolling Hills Public Charter School

Public Education.

Education
11
Alturas International Academy Inc

Public Education.

Education
12
The Island School

The Island School provides a flexible learning environment where each child is known and celebrated.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Innovation Spokane Schools and the most unlike its peers is Innovation Schools. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BLUEPRINT — $9,999,790 · EducationBLUEPRINTImpact Public Schools — $960,000 · EducationImpact Public SchoolsSpokane International Academy — $496,734 · Education+5 more — $1,236,612 · Education+5 moreRooted School Washington — $313,714 · OtherINNOVATION SCHOOLS — $249,389 · OtherPullman Community Montessori — $118,947 · OtherSOAR ACADEMIES — $72,589 · OtherAshe Preparatory Academy — $35,000 · Other
Education$12,693,136Other$789,639

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBLUEPRINT — $9,999,790 over 7y, 26% of budgetImpact Public Schools — $960,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetSpokane International Academy — $496,734 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetPINNACLES PREP CHARTER SCHOOL — $382,999 over 4y, 7.0% of budgetCascade Public Schools Why Not You Academy — $325,038 over 4y, 9.7% of budgetRooted School Washington — $313,714 over 2y, 28% of budgetCatalyst Public Schools — $267,118 over 3y, 8.6% of budgetINTERGENERATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL — $161,457 over 3y, 12% of budgetPullman Community Montessori — $118,947 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetInnovation Spokane Schools — $100,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSOAR ACADEMIES — $72,589 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetAshe Preparatory Academy — $35,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Washington State Charter Schools AssociationWA30.6× affinity12 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Washington State Charter Schools Association · New Schools Fund · Stand for Children Leadership Center Inc · Gates Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Blueprint Washington Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Blueprint Washington Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Blueprint Washington Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph