Skip to content

· Public charity

Washington Area Community Investment Fund Inc

The washington area community investment fund (wacif) is a nonprofit community loan fund focused on increasing equity and economic opportunity in the washington, dc area's underserved communities.

$845k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$405k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Community Improvement$6.1MHuman Services$690kFood & Nutrition$218kArts & Culture$201kEducation$149kHealth$106kYouth Development$57kScience & Tech$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k3 grants · $245k
  • $250k+2 grants · $680k
$125,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANACOSTIA ENTREPRENEURSHIP CENTER INC$404,882
1231-1235 GOOD HOPE ROAD INC$275,215
BBAR$125,000
YELEEN BEAUTY LLC$60,000
SEED SPOT INC$60,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $128k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 16% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ROCHDALE CAPITAL CORPORATION: $108k → 7%MEDICI ROAD: $10k → 14%COMMERCE DEPARTMENT CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.3M · 7 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
61

Total granted

$7.3M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+120%
+154%

Still filing today

29%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $125k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementEmploymentArts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • 1G
    1231-1235 GOOD HOPE ROAD INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $5.2M · revenue -67% · 100% of their budget
  • AE
    ANACOSTIA ENTREPRENEURSHIP CENTER INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +120% · 63% of their budget
  • YB
    YELEEN BEAUTY LLC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $590k

Funded once

  • TF
    THE FRESH FOOD FACTORY MARKET
    one grant, 2023 · $110k
  • RC
    ROCHDALE CAPITAL CORPORATION
    one grant, 2023 · $108k · revenue +10%
  • TM
    THE MAHOGANY BUSINESS GROUP DBA MAHOGANYBOOKS
    one grant, 2023 · $80k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Baltimore Development Corporation

The baltimore development corporation (bdc) is a non-profit organization that serves as the economic development agency for the city of baltimore. bdc's mission is to grow the city's economy in an inclusive, equitable manner by retaining,…

Community Improvement
2
Rockville Economic Development Inc

To identify and develop economic opportunities to help rockville prosper.

Community Improvement
3
Latino Economic Development Corporation

Ledc's mission is to catalyze economic advancement of latinos and local communities by bridging the gap to capital and resources to achieve financial prosperity. participants in our programs learn how to build their long-term financial…

Community Improvement
4
Washington Center for Equitable Growth Inc

The washington center for equitable growth is a non-profit research and grantmaking organization dedicated to advancing evidence-backed ideas and policies that promote strong, stable, and broad-based economic growth. organization dedicated…

Social Science
5
Development Gateway Inc

Development gateway (dg) creates tools and design processes that help collect, visualize, and use data for a more equitable world. for 20 years, we have built systems, dashboards, and tools to create more effective, open, and engaging…

International
6
Community Development Corporation of Long Island Inc

Cdcli invests in the housing and economic aspirations of individuals and families by providing solutions that foster and maintain vibrant, equitable, and sustainable communities.

Community Improvement
7
Building Markets Ltd

Building Markets unleashes the transformational power of small businesses to address pressing social challenges by driving job creation and inclusive growth. Founded in 2004, the organization finds, builds, and connects competitive local…

International
8
Racine County Economic Development Corporation

To provide economic development services including business recruitment, expansion, business financing, community and workforce development.

Human Services
9
Friends of Rhode Island Ave Ne
Community Improvement
10
Greater Washington Dc Black Chamber of Commerce

Supporting the need for economic development in the black community throgh education. additionally, promoting black business growth in the district of columbia through the facilitation of business opportunities.

Community Improvement
11
California Capital Small Business Financial Development Corporation

To equitably provide capital and development assistance to increase economic opportunities by offering a wide range of flexible financial products and technical services through collaboration.

Community Improvement
12
Didtechnology Inc

To promote social welfare and equity of underrepresented black and Latina women in the technology industry by alleviating the impact of discrimination and prejudice in lending and investment industries which prevent disadvantaged groups…

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medici Road; the most unlike its peers is Rochdale Capital Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

1231-1235 GOOD HOPE ROAD INC: $5,185,489 · Community Improvement1231-1235 GOOD HOPE ROAD INC+2 more: $185,000 · Community ImprovementYELEEN BEAUTY LLC: $590,000 · OtherYELEEN BEAUTY LLCNUBIAN HUEMAN: $147,500 · OtherNUBIAN HUEMANTHE FRESH FOOD FACTORY MARKET: $110,000 · OtherTHE FRESH FOOD FACTORY…THE MAHOGANY BUSINESS GROUP DBA MAHOGANYBOOKS: $80,000 · Other+56 more: $807,453 · Other+56 moreANACOSTIA ENTREPRENEURSHIP CENTER INC: $1,272,929 · Arts & CultureANACOSTIA ENTREP…ROCHDALE CAPITAL CORPORATION: $108,492 · Human ServicesCommerce Department Child Development Center: $10,000 · Human ServicesMEDICI ROAD: $10,000 · Human ServicesRAINBOW CHILD LEARNING CENTER INC: $30,000 · EducationBELOVED COMMUNITY INCUBATOR INC: $20,000 · EmploymentDREAMING OUT LOUD INC: $7,500 · Youth Development
Community Improvement$5,370,489Other$1,734,953Arts & Culture$1,272,929Human Services$128,492Education$30,000Employment$20,000Youth Development$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget1231-1235 GOOD HOPE ROAD INC: $5,185,489 over 4y, 100% of budgetANACOSTIA ENTREPRENEURSHIP CENTER INC: $1,272,929 over 4y, 63% of budgetROCHDALE CAPITAL CORPORATION: $108,492 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetSEED SPOT: $60,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetRAINBOW CHILD LEARNING CENTER INC: $30,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetBELOVED COMMUNITY INCUBATOR INC: $20,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetCommerce Department Child Development Center: $10,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetMEDICI ROAD: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetDREAMING OUT LOUD INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds 1231-1235 GOOD HOPE ROAD INC ↗
  • Who funds ANACOSTIA ENTREPRENEURSHIP CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BUILDING BRIDGES ACROSS THE RIVER INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCHDALE CAPITAL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds SEED SPOT ↗
  • Who funds RAINBOW CHILD LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BELOVED COMMUNITY INCUBATOR INC ↗
  • Who funds Commerce Department Child Development Center ↗
  • Who funds MEDICI ROAD ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Low Income Investment FundCA25× affinity11 shared granteesties to 2 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Low Income Investment Fund · Capital Impact Partners · Latino Economic Development Corporation · City First Enterprises Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Washington Area Community Investment Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Washington Area Community Investment Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Washington Area Community Investment’s filings →

    More from the funding graph