Skip to content

Washington · Public charity

Washington and Northern Idaho District Council of Laborers

To provide unity of action in dealing with union goals.

$254k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
5
Itemized grants FY2025
7
Organizations funded FY2024
71%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$121k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$20,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$60,000
Organizations funded a year
2 to 7
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$13M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 71% of the organizations Washington and Northern Idaho District Council of Laborers funded were first-time grantees, receiving 72% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $173k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementSocial ScienceOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving5$121k20%
FY20247$241k71%
FY20235$83k40%
FY20225$66k60%
FY20213$45k67%
FY20203$70k67%
FY20192$70k100%
FY20182$18k100%
89% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Public Benefit$180kRecreation & Sports$156kCommunity Improvement$115kEducation$98kEmployment$76kEnvironment$60kHuman Services$10kHealth$10kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 13 grantees
All grantees of Washington and Northern Idaho District Council of Laborers by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
W Vernie Reed Memorial Fund$97,50078%
Thurston County Chamber Foundation$95,000119%
The Truman Fund$75,0001n/a
The Laborers Northwest Regional Organizing Coalition$55,00020%
Partners for Energy Progess$50,00022%
Citizens for Better Transportation$50,0001n/a
Laborers' International Union of North America$20,50020%
WASHINGTON C L U B CHARITY GOLF CLASSIC co Quest Investment Management LLC$13,50026%
Yes on Vets and Human Service$10,0001n/a
Utility Contractors Association of Wa$10,00012%
Harborview Health for All$10,0001n/a
Washington Business Alliance Fund$10,0001n/a
Puget Sound Sage$7,50010%

Plus 9 recipients with no EIN on record ($303k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Washington and Northern Idaho District Council of Laborers supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetW Vernie Reed Memorial Fund: $97,500 over 7y, 8.0% of budgetThurston County Chamber Foundation: $95,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetThe Laborers Northwest Regional Organizing Coalition: $55,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPartners for Energy Progess: $50,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetLaborers' International Union of North America: $20,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON C L U B CHARITY GOLF CLASSIC co Quest Investment Management LLC: $13,500 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetUtility Contractors Association of Wa: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetPuget Sound Sage: $7,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Laborers International Union of North America Local Union No 242WA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Laborers International Union of North America Local Union No 242

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Washington and Northern Idaho District Council of Laborers with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Washington and Northern Idaho District Council of Laborers?

Find your warmest path to Washington and Northern Idaho District Council of Laborers through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Washington and Northern Idaho District Council of Laborers

How much does Washington and Northern Idaho District Council of Laborers give?
Washington and Northern Idaho District Council of Laborers reported 5 itemized grants totaling $121,000, out of $253,965 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 7 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Washington and Northern Idaho District Council of Laborers fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Public Benefit (22%), Recreation & Sports (19%), Community Improvement (14%).
Who are Washington and Northern Idaho District Council of Laborers's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: W Vernie Reed Memorial Fund ($98k), Thurston County Chamber Foundation ($95k), The Truman Fund ($75k).
Does Washington and Northern Idaho District Council of Laborers fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 71% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Washington and Northern Idaho District Council of Laborers?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Laborers International Union of North America Local Union No 242.
Where is Washington and Northern Idaho District Council of Laborers based?
Washington and Northern Idaho District Council of Laborers is based in WA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Washington and Northern Idaho District Council of Laborers’ filings →

More from the funding graph