Skip to content
Warner Charitable Trust Xxxxx1008 at a glance

· Private foundation

Warner Charitable Trust Xxxxx1008

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$59k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$200kScience & Tech$55kInternational$36kHealth$36kPublic Benefit$18k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,109
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HARVARD UNIVERSITY$9,326
CAMBRIDGE IN AMERICA$9,326
MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERS$6,217
BOULDER PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT$6,217
COLORADO COLLEGE$6,217
UNICEF$3,109
CARNEGIE PUBLIC LIBRARY$3,109
UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION$3,109
CARE INC$3,109
NOWATA OKLAHOMA PUBLIC LIBRARY$3,109
CITY OF BOULDER$3,109
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO$3,109
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $10k → 8%UNICEF: $3k → 17%NOWATA OKLAHOMA PUBLIC LIBRARY: $3k → 16%CARE INC: $3k → 13%COLORADO COLLEGE: $7k → 9%MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERS: $7k → 12%CARNEGIE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $3k → 15%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $9k → 8%UNICEF: $3k → 17%NOWATA OKLAHOMA PUBLIC LIBRARY: $3k → 16%CARE INC: $3k → 13%COLORADO COLLEGE: $6k → 9%MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERS: $6k → 12%CARNEGIE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $3k → 15%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $9k → 8%UNICEF: $3k → 17%NOWATA OKLAHOMA PUBLIC LIBRARY: $3k → 16%CARE INC: $3k → 13%COLORADO COLLEGE: $6k → 9%MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERS: $6k → 12%CARNEGIE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $3k → 15%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $9k → 8%UNICEF: $3k → 17%NOWATA OKLAHOMA PUBLIC LIBRARY: $3k → 16%CARE INC: $3k → 13%COLORADO COLLEGE: $6k → 9%MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERS: $6k → 12%CARNEGIE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $3k → 15%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $9k → 8%UNICEF: $3k → 17%NOWATA OKLAHOMA PUBLIC LIBRARY: $3k → 16%CARE INC: $3k → 13%COLORADO COLLEGE: $6k → 9%MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERS: $6k → 12%CARNEGIE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $3k → 15%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $9k → 8%UNICEF: $3k → 17%NOWATA OKLAHOMA PUBLIC LIBRARY: $3k → 16%CARE INC: $3k → 13%COLORADO COLLEGE: $6k → 9%MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERS: $6k → 12%BOULDER PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT: $6k → 12%BOULDER PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT: $6k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $3k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $3k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $3k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $3k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$288k · 12 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
1

Total granted

$288k
$3k

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    CAMBRIDGE IN AMERICA
    6× · 2020–2025 · $55k · revenue +89%
  • TC
    THE COLORADO COLLEGE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $36k · revenue +3%
  • MH
    MENTAL HEALTH CENTER OF BOULDER COUNTY INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $36k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
7/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MENTAL HEALTH CENTER OF BOULDER COUNTY INC: $36,332 · OtherMENTAL HEALTH CENTER OF BOULDER COUNTY INCBOULDER PUBLIC LIBRARY: $24,417 · OtherBOULDER PUBLIC LIBRARYUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $18,167 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF COLORADONOWATA OKLAHOMA PUBLIC LIBRARY: $18,167 · OtherNOWATA OKLAHOMA PUBLIC LIBRARYCITY OF BOULDER: $18,167 · OtherCITY OF BOULDERCARNEGIE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $18,167 · OtherCARNEGIE PUBLIC LIBRARYBOULDER PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT: $11,915 · OtherBOULDER PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT+1 more: $2,997 · OtherPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $54,500 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard C…THE COLORADO COLLEGE: $36,332 · EducationTHE COLORADO COLLEGEUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC: $15,170 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATIO…CAMBRIDGE IN AMERICA: $54,500 · InternationalCAMBRIDGE IN AMERICACOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $18,167 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AN…UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $18,167 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
Other$148,329Education$106,002International$90,834

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $54,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCAMBRIDGE IN AMERICA: $54,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COLORADO COLLEGE: $36,332 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH CENTER OF BOULDER COUNTY INC: $36,332 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $18,167 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $18,167 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC: $15,170 over 5y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds CAMBRIDGE IN AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds THE COLORADO COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MENTAL HEALTH CENTER OF BOULDER COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Warner Charitable Trust Xxxxx1008 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Warner Charitable Trust Xxxxx1008. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Warner Charitable Trust Xxxxx1008’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home