Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Wantoot Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What you fund
0186% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Arts & Culture$29kEnvironment$9kReligion$5kHealth$3kCrime & Legal$1kEducation$650Youth Development$500Animals$250Other$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$133k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HIGHLANDS BIOLOGICAL FOUNDATION$1,000
CHATTOOGA CONSERVANCY$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%HOSPICE SAVANNAH: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

28%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$14k · 8 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
12

Total granted

$14k
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+1%

Still filing today

75%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $250 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentAnimalsArts & CultureCrime & LegalEducationYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HB
    Highlands Biological Foundation Inc
    4× · 2020–2024 · $4k · revenue +27%
  • TO
    THE ORIANNE SOCIETY
    5× · 2019–2023 · $3k · revenue +114%
  • HH
    HIGHLANDS HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $750 · revenue +107%

Funded once

  • CL
    CENTRAL LOUISIANA COMM FDN
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • HS
    HISTORIC SAVANNAH FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +1%
  • BA
    BRIGHAM ADN WOMEN'S HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2022 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Highlands Historical Society

The Highlands Historical Society formed to preserve, restore and interpret the historic mansion and grounds from 1794 to the present.

Arts & Culture
2
Wild South

We inspire people to enjoy, value and protect the wild character and natural legacy of the South.

Environment
3
South Carolina National Heritage Corridor

The organization's primary mission is a grassroots initiative that advances sustainable development of natural, cultural and historic resources for enhanced quality of life and economic revitalization of communities in south carolina.

Arts & Culture
4
Southern Appalachian Highlands Conservancy

To conserve the unique plant and animal habitat, clean water, farmland, scenic beauty, and places for all people to enjoy outdoor recreation in the mountains of North Carolina and Tennessee, enduring for future generations. Continued-see…

Environment
5
The South Fork Conservancy Incorporated

The mission of the South Fork Conservancy is to restore and preserve habitat along the tributaries of Peachtree Creek. We give the community access to these healthy, restored greenspaces by designing, building and maintaining nature trails.

Environment
6
Humane Society of Charlotte Inc

Humane Society of Charlotte mission is to champion the wellbeing of companion animals and strengthen their bond with the people who know, love, and need them.

Animals
7
Historic Oakland Foundation Inc

The Historic Oakland Foundation partners with the City of Atlanta to preserve, restore, enhance, and share Oakland Cemetery with the public as an important island of tranquilty in the heart of the city.

8
The Hibernian Society of Savannah Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
9
Center for Heirs' Property Preservation

(See Schedule O)

Crime & Legal
10
Chastain Park Conservancy Inc

The Conservancy's mission is to restore, enhance, maintain and preserve Chastain Park through the implementation of its 20-year Master Plan. With one eye on Chastain Park's glorious past and another on its promising future, the Conservancy…

Recreation & Sports
11
Catawba Lands Conservancy

As a nationally accredited land trust, we conserve and manage land for public benefit in North Carolinas Southern Piedmont. We have conserved 235 properties, totaling 17,786 acres of land. We also facilitate the creation of a 1600 mile…

Environment
12
Historic Wilmington Foundation Inc

The mission of Historic Wilmington Foundation is to protect and preserve the irreplaceable historic resources of Wilmington and the Lower Cape Fear Region.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cashiers Highlands Humane Society and the most unlike its peers is Wormsloe Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CENTRAL LOUISIANA COMM FDN — $25,000 · OtherCENTRAL LOUISIANA COMM FDNHighlands Biological Foundation Inc — $4,000 · OtherHighlands Biological Foundation IncCHRIST CHURCH EPISCOPAL — $4,000 · OtherCHRIST CHURCH EPISCOPALHISTORIC SAVANNAH FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 · OtherBRIGHAM ADN WOMEN'S HOSPITAL — $2,000 · Other+5 more — $3,500 · Other+5 moreTHE ORIANNE SOCIETY — $2,500 · AnimalsCASHIERS HIGHLANDS HUMANE SOCIETY — $250 · AnimalsTRUSTEES' GARDEN CLUB INC — $1,050 · EnvironmentHighlands-Cashiers Land Trust Inc — $1,000 · EnvironmentCHATTOOGA CONSERVANCY — $250 · EnvironmentThe Bascom Corporation — $750 · Arts & CultureHIGHLANDS HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $750 · Arts & CulturePISGAH LEGAL SERVICES — $1,000 · Crime & LegalHOSPICE SAVANNAH INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION — $650 · EducationURBAN HOPE INC — $500 · Youth Development
Other$40,500Animals$2,750Environment$2,300Arts & Culture$1,500Crime & Legal$1,000Human Services$1,000Education$650Youth Development$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHighlands Biological Foundation Inc — $4,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ORIANNE SOCIETY — $2,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHISTORIC SAVANNAH FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES' GARDEN CLUB INC — $1,050 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHighlands-Cashiers Land Trust Inc — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORMSLOE FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPISGAH LEGAL SERVICES — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE SAVANNAH INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Bascom Corporation — $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHIGHLANDS HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $750 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION — $650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN HOPE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHATTOOGA CONSERVANCY — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASHIERS HIGHLANDS HUMANE SOCIETY — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mountain Findings IncNC15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mountain Findings Inc · The Woodcrest Foundation · The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc · Boger-Owen Foundation · Farmer Lee Foundation Inc · The Bell Family Foundation · The Klamon Family Foundation Inc · Ashcourt Family Foundation Inc · The Dunlap-Cogswell Foundation · The Inman Foundation · The H Foundation · The Savannah Community Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Wantoot Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Wantoot Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Wantoot Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph