Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wallie Lock Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$17k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$62kPhilanthropy$30kCommunity Improvement$18kReligion$13kYouth Development$11kEducation$9kPublic Benefit$5kHealth$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,400
Median grant
1
States reached
$471k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHRISTY'S HOPE FOR BATTERED WOMEN$6,000
NEIGHBORHOOD LONGHORN PROGRAM$3,500
HILL COUNTRY FAMILY SERVICES$3,000
FORGING FUTURES EDUCATION FDN$2,400
UNITED WAY OF DENTON COUNTY INC$1,250
FOLDS OF HONOR$630
VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS$600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 3% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HILL COUNTRY FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 7%HILL COUNTRY FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 7%TRANSFORMATIONS BY AUSTIN ANGELS: $660 → 10%HILL COUNTRY FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 7%HILL COUNTRY FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 7%HILL COUNTRY FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 7%BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN: $4k → 6%MEALS ON WHEELS: $580 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$151k · 17 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
15

Total granted

$151k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+23%

Still filing today

47%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthRecreation & SportsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF THE COASTAL BEND INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $20k · revenue +56%
  • HC
    HILL COUNTRY FAMILY SERVICES INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $15k · revenue +48%
  • TA
    THE ANNUNCIATION MATERNITY HOME INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $7k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • BI
    BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL INC
    one grant, 2019 · $4k · revenue +3%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
  • GH
    GEORGETOWN HIGH SCHOOL SR CLASS
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Good Work Austin

Good Work Austin's mission is to foster healthy careers in the local food and beverage industry through professional development and advocacy for more equitable practices.

Public Benefit
2
Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Houston Inc

The Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Houston's mission is to inspire and enable all youth, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

Youth Development
3
United Way of Brazoria County

To educate, unite and focus our community's resources in order to efficiently address the most critical needs of Brazoria County

Philanthropy
4
Austin Clubhouse Inc

The Austin Clubhouse exists to provide acceptance and empowerment so adults living with mental health diagnoses can pursue personal goals and play a meaningful role as co-workers, colleagues, family members, neighbors and friends.

Health
5
United Way of Central Texas Inc

To provide support, both managerial and financial, to human service programs of the central texas area. to bring the entire community together to find lasting solutions that change people's lives.

Philanthropy
6
Boys & Girls Clubs of Deep East Texas

To provide a place for children to go where they will have supervised activities, arts, crafts, and recreation.

Youth Development
7
Brazos Employment Enterprises Dba the Bee Community

To provide community, life-long learning, and meaningful work for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

—
8
Womens Center of Brazoria County Inc

Comprehensive service to domestic violence and sexual assault victims

Human Services
9
United Way of East-Central Texas

To support local united way agencies to provide needed services to community members.

Philanthropy
10
Young Texans Against Cancer Dallas

Young Texans Against Cancer is a network of motivated young professionals collectively working together to raise awareness and funds to support the local Dallas cancer community. The Dallas chapter was established in 2007, as part of a…

—
11
The Women's Resource of Greater Houston

See Schedule OThe Women's Resource of Greater Houston helps women and girls make choices toward becoming independent, productive, and financially stable. We fulfill our mission by recruiting volunteer instructors to deliver our programs in…

Philanthropy
12
Ambassadors for Community Health - Auxiliary of St Davids Medical Center

Our mission is to enrich the Central Texas community by providing support to patients and by funding scholarships for future healthcare professionals.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ascension Seton Williamson Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Parents for Pride Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHRISTY'S HOPE FOR BATTERED WOMEN: $46,000 · OtherCHRISTY'S HOPE FOR BATTERED WOMENNEIGHBORHOOD LONGHORN PROGRAM: $17,950 · OtherNEIGHBORHOOD LONGHORN PROGRAMFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ALTHLETES: $12,560 · OtherFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ALTHLETESIndividual grant recipient: $7,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS: $4,600 · Other+16 more: $22,770 · Other+16 moreUNITED WAY OF THE COASTAL BEND INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF THE C…THE ANNUNCIATION MATERNITY HOME INC: $7,250 · PhilanthropyTHE ANNUNCIATION MA…INVITED FOUNDATION: $1,600 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF DENTON COUNTY INC: $1,250 · PhilanthropyHILL COUNTRY FAMILY SERVICES INC: $14,800 · Human ServicesHILL COUNTRY …BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesBROOKWOOD IN …+2 more: $1,240 · Human Services+2 moreBoys Club of Brazos County Inc: $6,300 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GEORGETOWN: $1,200 · Youth DevelopmentFORGING FUTURES EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $2,400 · EducationBREAST CANCER RESOURCE CENTER: $1,100 · HealthHomeAid Austin Inc: $1,000 · EmploymentNEXT LEVEL SPORTS TRAINING: $400 · Recreation & Sports
Other$110,880Philanthropy$30,100Human Services$20,040Youth Development$7,500Education$2,400Health$1,100Employment$1,000Recreation & Sports$400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF THE COASTAL BEND INC: $20,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHILL COUNTRY FAMILY SERVICES INC: $14,800 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ANNUNCIATION MATERNITY HOME INC: $7,250 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetBoys Club of Brazos County Inc: $6,300 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARENTS FOR PRIDE INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetASCENSION SETON WILLIAMSON FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINVITED FOUNDATION: $1,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF DENTON COUNTY INC: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GEORGETOWN: $1,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBREAST CANCER RESOURCE CENTER: $1,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHomeAid Austin Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTRANSFORMATIONS BY AUSTIN ANGELS: $660 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEXT LEVEL SPORTS TRAINING: $400 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE COASTAL BEND INC ↗
  • Who funds HILL COUNTRY FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ANNUNCIATION MATERNITY HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds Boys Club of Brazos County Inc ↗
  • Who funds BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds PARENTS FOR PRIDE INC ↗
  • Who funds ASCENSION SETON WILLIAMSON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INVITED FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF DENTON COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GEORGETOWN ↗
  • Who funds BREAST CANCER RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HomeAid Austin Inc ↗
  • Who funds TRANSFORMATIONS BY AUSTIN ANGELS ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds NEXT LEVEL SPORTS TRAINING ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Central Texas Community FoundationTX15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Central Texas Community Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · United Way Worldwide · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wallie Lock Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wallie Lock Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Wallie Lock Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Wallie Lock Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wallie Lock’s filings →

    More from the funding graph