Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wagner Foundation

$951k
Granted FY2022
14
Grants FY2022
3
States reached
$350k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Arts & Culture$3.6MEducation$776kRecreation & Sports$551kHuman Services$139kReligion$105kPhilanthropy$100kMembership Benefit$100kPublic Safety & Disaster$33kOther$0
02FY2022 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k5 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $489k
  • $250k+1 grant · $350k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KELCH AVIATION MUSEUM INC$350,000
MANO A MANO$201,172
MID-CONTINENT RAILWAY MUSEUM$157,629
COMMEMORATIVE AIR FORCE LAKE SUPERIOR SQUADRON$80,000
BURLINGTON CATHOLIC SCHOOL$50,000
CATHOLIC CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL$25,000
BURLINGTON CEMETERY ASSOCIATION$25,000
ST JOHN'S LUTHERAN SCHOOL$25,000
WINGS OF HOPE$10,000
WALWORTH COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES$9,800
SAUK COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES$5,000
LIFE CHOICES INC$5,000
JOHN XXIII EDUCATIONAL CENTER$5,000
BURLINGTON HIGH SCHOOL$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 90% of grant dollars ($5.3M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 10% that went abroad ($614k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 87% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%MANO A MANO: $277k → 6%MANO A MANO: $201k → 14%88 CHARLIES INC: $38k → 8%MID-CONTINENT RAILWAY MUSEUM: $559k → 9%BURLINGTON COMMUNITY POOL: $126k → 10%KELCH AVIATION MUSEUM INC: $350k → 10%COMMEMORATIVE AIR FORCE LAKE SUPERIOR SQUADRON: $80k → 11%MITCHELL GALLERY OF FLIGHT: $111k → 17%MANO A MANO GENERAL: $252k → 6%MANO A MANO: $131k → 14%MID-CONTINENT RAILWAY MUSEUM: $523k → 9%BURLINGTON COMMUNITY POOL: $125k → 10%COMMEMORATIVE AIR FORCE LAKE SUPERIOR SQUADRON: $75k → 11%MANO A MANO: $173k → 6%MID-CONTINENT RAILWAY MUSEUM: $357k → 9%CATHOLIC CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL: $115k → 10%MID-CONTINENT RAILWAY MUSEUM: $169k → 9%BURLINGTON COMMUNITY FUND: $100k → 10%MID-CONTINENT RAILWAY MUSEUM: $158k → 9%BURLINGTON COMMUNITY POOL: $100k → 10%MID-CONTINENT RAILWAY MUSEUM: $134k → 9%BURLINGTON COMMUNITY POOL: $100k → 10%SAUK COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES: $22k → 9%BURLINGTON COMMUNITY POOL: $100k → 10%SAUK COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES: $19k → 9%CATHOLIC CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL: $85k → 10%SAUK COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES: $15k → 9%BURLINGTON CEMETERY ASSOCIATION: $75k → 10%BURLINGTON CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $50k → 10%BURLINGTON CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $50k → 10%BURLINGTON CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $50k → 10%ST MARY'S CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $25k → 10%ST JOHN'S LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $25k → 10%CATHOLIC CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL: $25k → 10%ST CHARLES CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $25k → 10%ST JOHN'S LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $25k → 10%CATHOLIC CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL: $25k → 10%CATHOLIC CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL: $25k → 10%CATHOLIC CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL: $25k → 10%ST JOHN'S LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $25k → 10%ST CHARLES CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $25k → 10%ST JOHN'S LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $25k → 10%ST MARY'S CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $25k → 10%ST JOHN'S LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $25k → 10%ST JOHN'S LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $25k → 10%ST MARY'S CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $25k → 10%BURLINGTON CEMETERY ASSOCIATION: $25k → 10%ST CHARLES CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $25k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 10% of all-years giving ($614k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Bolivia$345k · 6 grants
Belize$269k · 8 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.9M · 20 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2022, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
9

Total granted

$4.9M
$655k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+32%

Still filing today

10%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $370k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Recreation & SportsInternationalHealthYouth DevelopmentArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MR
    MID-CONTINENT RAILWAY MUSEUM
    6× · 2017–2022 · $1.9M
  • MA
    MANO A MANO
    5× · 2017–2022 · $783k
  • BC
    BURLINGTON COMMUNITY POOL CORP
    5× · 2017–2021 · $551k · revenue +53% · 35% of their budget

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $252k
  • MG
    MITCHELL GALLERY OF FLIGHT
    one grant, 2021 · $111k
  • BC
    BURLINGTON COMMUNITY FUND LTD
    one grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue +22%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boys Club of Burkburnett Burkburnett Boys & Girls Club

To encourage and enable all youth to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens by providing guidance and character development in various sports, recreational, and leadership activities.

Youth Development
2
Burlington Library Foundation Inc

The burlington library foundation is organized as a not-for-profit (501 (c)3) organization to secure contributions necessary to provide exemplary service to patrons and our community through modern and accessible facilities and…

Education
3
Burlingame Aquatic Club Inc

To serve our community by providing excellent aquatic opportunities.

Philanthropy
4
Burton Volunteer Fire Department

To provide fire and ems services to the residents of burton village and the surrounding communities.

Public Safety & Disaster
5
Bloomer Area Aquatic and Recreation Center Inc

The organization was created to construct and operate a state of the art pool, fitness, and community center in bloomer, wisconsin. the facility offers swim lessons, fitness memberships, and a place for the community to gather for meetings…

Recreation & Sports
6
Life Choice Care Center Inc

To provide physical and emotional support to women and their families facing unplanned pregnancies through a christ centered and biblically based approach.

Human Services
7
Billings Family Ymca Inc

To put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all.

Human Services
8
Cadet Air Corps Museum

The Corporation endeavours to educate the public about aviation history and to honor veterans by creating and flying World War trainer aircraft

Arts & Culture
9
Greater Burlington Ymca Inc

The ymca builds a strong community by involving youth, adults, and families in programs and activities that help them learn, grow, and thrive. we strive to eliminate barriers to participation by offering both direct financial assistance…

Human Services
10
Boys and Girls Club of Bloomington Inc

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring and responsible citizens.

Youth Development
11
Boys & Girls Clubs of America

The mission of the organization is to operate exclusively for the benefit of, or to carry out the purposes of, boys and girls clubs of america, a d.c. corporation that was congressionally chartered in 1956 ("boys & girls clubs of america")…

Youth Development
12
Boys and Girls Clubs of the Capital Area

To provide a safe, fun place where youth are inspired to make healthy, responsible choices.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Burlington Community Pool Corp; the most unlike its peers is Life Choices Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MID-CONTINENT RAILWAY MUSEUM: $1,899,733 · OtherMID-CONTINENT RAILWAY MUSEUMMANO A MANO: $783,125 · OtherMANO A MANOKELCH AVIATION MUSEUM INC: $350,000 · OtherKELCH AVIATION MUSEUM INCCATHOLIC CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL OF BURLINGTON INC: $300,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL OF BURLINGTON INCIndividual grant recipient: $251,837 · OtherKOLBE FOUNDATION: $215,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $180,000 · Other+19 more: $1,227,505 · Other+19 moreBURLINGTON COMMUNITY POOL CORP: $550,619 · Recreation & SportsBURLINGTON…BURLINGTON COMMUNITY FUND LTD: $100,000 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMEMORATIVE AIR FORCE: $50,000 · Arts & CultureFaith Hope & Love Inc: $10,000 · Public BenefitWINGS OF HOPE: $10,000 · InternationalLIFE CHOICES INC: $5,000 · HealthBADGER BOYS STATE INCORPORATED: $1,000 · Youth Development
Other$5,207,200Recreation & Sports$550,619Philanthropy$100,000Arts & Culture$50,000Public Benefit$10,000International$10,000Health$5,000Youth Development$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBURLINGTON COMMUNITY POOL CORP: $550,619 over 5y, 35% of budgetBURLINGTON COMMUNITY FUND LTD: $100,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetTHE COMMEMORATIVE AIR FORCE: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFaith Hope & Love Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetWINGS OF HOPE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLIFE CHOICES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetGENEVA LAKES FAMILY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BURLINGTON COMMUNITY POOL CORP ↗
  • Who funds BURLINGTON COMMUNITY FUND LTD ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMEMORATIVE AIR FORCE ↗
  • Who funds Faith Hope & Love Inc ↗
  • Who funds WINGS OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds LIFE CHOICES INC ↗
  • Who funds GENEVA LAKES FAMILY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BADGER BOYS STATE INCORPORATED ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oneill Foundation IncWI15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oneill Foundation Inc · Wagner-Essman Care Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wagner Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wagner Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Wagner Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Wagner Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2023) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wagner’s filings →

    More from the funding graph