Skip to content

· Private foundation

W Buford Lewis and Linda M Lewis Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$99k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$438kEducation$315kArts & Culture$151kSocial Science$12kYouth Development$8kPublic Safety & Disaster$4kHuman Services$500International$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$1,500
Median grant
10
States reached
$413k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$60,000
THE METROPOLITAN OPERA$25,000
DUKE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$2,000
COROLLA EDUCATION FOUNDATION$2,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$1,500
UVA LAW SCHOOL FOUNDATION$1,500
HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL FOUNDATION$1,500
HARLEM VILLAGE ACADEMIES$1,000
COMMUNITY IN CRISIS$1,000
NINOS CON FUTURO FUNDACION USA$1,000
THE HOCKADAY SCHOOL ANNUAL FUND$1,000
WOODBERRY FOREST SCHOOL$500
LSU FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NY
MA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
KS
NC
DC
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$701k · 20 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +103% since the first grant, against +98% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
3

Total granted

$701k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+103%
+98%

Still filing today

30%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CE
    COROLLA EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $32k · revenue +281%
  • COMMUNITY IN CRISIS INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $7k · revenue +371%
  • LF
    LSU FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $4k · revenue +103%

Funded once

  • SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue +48%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue +98%
  • CH
    CONVENANT HOUSE
    one grant, 2023 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
2
Jefferson Scholars Foundation

The jefferson scholars foundation (foundation) provides academic merit-based scholarship, fellowship and professorship support to students and faculty at the university of virginia (uva).

Philanthropy
3
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education
4
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
5
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
8
William & Mary Foundation

The William & Mary Foundation advances the university's highest aspirations by securing private support, guiding a multi-asset investment portfolio, and offering strategic leadership. In this work, we propel the university toward national…

Education
9
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
The Florida State University Foundation Inc

The florida state university foundation enhances the academic mission and vision of florida state university through its organized fundraising activities and funds management. the fsu foundation accomplishes its mission by fostering…

Education
12
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Community in Crisis Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
9/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $420,000 · OtherJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONTHE METROPOLITAN OPERA: $148,000 · OtherTHE METROPOLITAN OPERA+13 more: $84,800 · Other+13 moreVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $226,750 · EducationVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INCCOROLLA EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $32,000 · EducationCOROLLA EDUCATION FOUNDATION+3 more: $6,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY IN CRISIS INC: $7,000 · HealthAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $3,500 · Human ServicesSANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC: $500 · Human ServicesMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $500 · International
Other$652,800Education$264,750Health$7,000Human Services$4,000International$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $226,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOROLLA EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $32,000 over 7y, 3.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY IN CRISIS INC: $7,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetLSU FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOODBERRY FOREST SCHOOL: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COROLLA EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY IN CRISIS INC ↗
  • Who funds LSU FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WOODBERRY FOREST SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization W Buford Lewis and Linda M Lewis Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from W Buford Lewis and Linda M Lewis Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 56%
  • Community in Crisis Inc: 56% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on W Buford Lewis and Linda M Lewis Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph