Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

W Buford Lewis and Linda M Lewis Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$99k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$438kEducation$315kArts & Culture$151kSocial Science$12kYouth Development$8kPublic Safety & Disaster$4kHuman Services$500International$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$1,500
Median grant
10
States reached
$413k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$60,000
THE METROPOLITAN OPERA$25,000
DUKE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$2,000
COROLLA EDUCATION FOUNDATION$2,000
HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL FOUNDATION$1,500
AMERICAN RED CROSS$1,500
UVA LAW SCHOOL FOUNDATION$1,500
THE HOCKADAY SCHOOL ANNUAL FUND$1,000
HARLEM VILLAGE ACADEMIES$1,000
NINOS CON FUTURO FUNDACION USA$1,000
COMMUNITY IN CRISIS$1,000
LSU FOUNDATION$500
WOODBERRY FOREST SCHOOL$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NY
MA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
KS
NC
DC
LA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$701k · 20 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +103% since the first grant, against +98% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
3

Total granted

$701k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+103%
+98%

Still filing today

30%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesInternationalHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CE
    COROLLA EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $32k · revenue +281%
  • COMMUNITY IN CRISIS INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $7k · revenue +371%
  • LF
    LSU FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $4k · revenue +103%

Funded once

  • SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue +48%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue +98%
  • CH
    CONVENANT HOUSE
    one grant, 2023 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
2
Jefferson Scholars Foundation

The jefferson scholars foundation (foundation) provides academic merit-based scholarship, fellowship and professorship support to students and faculty at the university of virginia (uva).

Philanthropy
3
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education
4
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
5
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

8
William & Mary Foundation

The William & Mary Foundation advances the university's highest aspirations by securing private support, guiding a multi-asset investment portfolio, and offering strategic leadership. In this work, we propel the university toward national…

Education
9
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
The Florida State University Foundation Inc

The florida state university foundation enhances the academic mission and vision of florida state university through its organized fundraising activities and funds management. the fsu foundation accomplishes its mission by fostering…

Education
12
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc and the most unlike its peers is Community in Crisis Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
9/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $420,000 · OtherJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONTHE METROPOLITAN OPERA — $148,000 · OtherTHE METROPOLITAN OPERA+13 more — $84,800 · Other+13 moreVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC — $226,750 · EducationVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INCCOROLLA EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $32,000 · EducationCOROLLA EDUCATION FOUNDATION+3 more — $6,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY IN CRISIS INC — $7,000 · HealthAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $3,500 · Human ServicesSANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC — $500 · Human ServicesMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $500 · International
Other$652,800Education$264,750Health$7,000Human Services$4,000International$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC — $226,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOROLLA EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $32,000 over 7y, 3.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY IN CRISIS INC — $7,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetLSU FOUNDATION — $4,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOODBERRY FOREST SCHOOL — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds COROLLA EDUCATION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds COMMUNITY IN CRISIS INC
  • Who funds LSU FOUNDATION
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds WOODBERRY FOREST SCHOOL
  • Who funds SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization W Buford Lewis and Linda M Lewis Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 56%
  • Community in Crisis Inc56% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph