· Private foundation
W Basil & Nina Leach Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 80% of W BASIL & NINA LEACH CHARITABLE TRUST’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| A FOR MEXICO EDUCATION INC | $3,665 |
| UPLIFT MID-MO | $3,665 |
| AUDRAIN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $3,665 |
| SOUTHSIDE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY | $3,665 |
| CHILDREN'S THERAPY & EARLY EDUCATION SCHOOL | $3,665 |
| THE LAURA MILLER GEORGE HELP CENTER | $3,665 |
| AUDRAIN COUNTY SHELTER RESOURCE COALITION | $3,665 |
| INTERNATIONAL SADDLEBRED HALL OF FAME | $3,665 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,665 |
| PRESSER PERFORMING ARTS CENTER | $3,665 |
| ARTHUR HILLS GOLF COURSE | $3,665 |
| EASTERN MISSOURI FAMILY YMCA | $3,665 |
| MEXICO HANDI-SHOP INC | $3,665 |
| MEXICO SENIOR CENTER INC | $3,665 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,665 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $59k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
32 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MAMexico Area Family YMCA INC7× · 2018–2024 · $32k · revenue +82%
- CTCHILDREN'S THERAPY & EARLY EDUCATION SCHOOL INC7× · 2019–2025 · $28k · revenue +36%
- THTHE HELP CENTER INC5× · 2017–2021 · $25k · revenue +46%
Funded once
- HCHOSPITAL COALITIONone grant, 2020 · $5k
- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITYone grant, 2017 · $5k
- SVST VINCENT DE PAULone grant, 2020 · $4k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide housing for elderly
The carthage crisis center is committed to restoring homeless and needy people to self sufficiency with god's help.
Provide emergency shelter and meals, case management and assessment to homeless individuals and families from the ashtabula county and surrounding areas.
Operate museum
Discover, preserve, and celebrate the history of washington county, arkansas, and to share that heritage with others.
The Anderson County Community Action Commission provides food, clothing, household foods, and essential assistance to low-income residents of Anderson County, Tennessee. The organization operates a community food pantry, clothing closet,…
Provide Emergency services, services include food, clothing, utility payment assistance, rental assistance, school supplies, infant care and medical assistance for 10442 individuals
Collection and preservation of historical documents pertaining to saint charles county, missouri and making them available to the general public
The Gibson Center for Behavorial Change is committed to providing comprehensive services which promote new behaviors for a healthy lifestyle.
Provide emergency food for those in need.
Provide the public with historical resources & preserve the collection of artifacts, photographs, documents, & other memorabilia. Assist with historical & genealogical research & engage the community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Our House Inc and the most unlike its peers is Arthur Hills Golf Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 38. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 10% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MEXICO SENIOR CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Mexico Area Family YMCA INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S THERAPY & EARLY EDUCATION SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds THE HELP CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE FOOD BANK FOR CENTRAL & NORTHEAST MISSOURI ↗
- Who funds ARTHUR HILLS GOLF ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds AUDRAIN COUNTY CRISIS INTERVENTION ↗
- Who funds UPLIFT MID-MO ↗
- Who funds MEXICO RECREATION CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Audrain County Historical Society ↗
- Who funds Room at the Inn ↗
- Who funds AUDRAIN COUNTY SHELTER RESOURCE COALITION ↗
- Who funds Mexico Area Chamber of Commerce ↗
- Who funds MEXICO PARKS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds VANDALIA AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Miriam a Edmonston Charitable Foundation · Griffin Family Foundation Inc · Consolidated Cares · Allen P and Josephine B Green · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · The Stribling Foundation Inc · Mfa Oil Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization W Basil & Nina Leach Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.