Skip to content

· Public charity

Volunteer Lawyers Project of the Boston Bar Association Inc

The mission of the volunteer lawyers project of the boston bar association is to increase access to justice by delivering high quality pro bono civil legal services to eligible clients in the greater boston area.

$56k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$56k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Crime & Legal$669k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$56,339
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
METROWEST LEGAL SERVICES$56,339
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SOUTH COASTAL CONTIES LEGAL SERVICES: $38k → 8%METROWEST LEGAL SERVICES: $58k → 8%COMMUNITY LEGAL AID: $38k → 11%GREATER BOSTON LEGAL SERVICES: $38k → 16%METROWEST LEGAL SERVICES: $56k → 8%COMMUNITY LEGAL AID: $25k → 11%GREATER BOSTON LEGAL SERVICES: $25k → 16%METROWEST LEGAL SERVICES: $56k → 8%METROWEST LEGAL SERVICES: $56k → 8%METROWEST LEGAL SERVICES: $51k → 8%METROWEST LEGAL SERVICES: $51k → 8%METROWEST LEGAL SERVICES: $47k → 8%METROWEST LEGAL SERVICES: $47k → 8%METROWEST LEGAL SERVICES: $44k → 8%NORTHEAST LEGAL AID: $38k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
5/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

METROWEST LEGAL SERVICES INC: $466,037 · OtherMETROWEST LEGAL SERVICES INCGREATER BOSTON LEGAL SERVICES INC: $63,346 · OtherGREATER BOSTON LEGAL SERVICES INCCOMMUNITY LEGAL AID INC: $63,346 · Crime & LegalCOMMUNITY LEGAL AID INCSOUTH COASTAL COUNTIES LEGAL SERVICES INC: $38,346 · Crime & LegalSOUTH COASTAL COUNTIES …NORTHEAST LEGAL AID INC: $38,346 · Crime & LegalNORTHEAST LEGAL AID INC
Other$529,383Crime & Legal$140,038

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMETROWEST LEGAL SERVICES INC: $466,037 over 9y, 2.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY LEGAL AID INC: $63,346 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGREATER BOSTON LEGAL SERVICES INC: $63,346 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTH COASTAL COUNTIES LEGAL SERVICES INC: $38,346 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNORTHEAST LEGAL AID INC: $38,346 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Massachusetts Continuing Legal Education IncMA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Massachusetts Continuing Legal Education Inc · Massachusetts Bar Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Volunteer Lawyers Project of the Boston Bar Association Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Volunteer Lawyers Project of the Boston Bar Association Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Metrowest Legal Services Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Northeast Legal Aid Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Community Legal Aid Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Legal Services Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 5 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Volunteer Lawyers Project of the Boston Bar Association’s filings →

More from the funding graph