Skip to content
Vntc Ttee Jewel and Lee Davenport Charitable at a glance

· Private foundation

Vntc Ttee Jewel and Lee Davenport Charitable

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$138k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$48k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Education$214kReligion$103kHuman Services$39kYouth Development$26kFood & Nutrition$26kArts & Culture$21k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $58k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $80k
$8,259
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
College of The Albemarle Foundation Inc$48,180
Mid-Atlantic Christian University$20,649
Scuppernong Christian Church$11,013
Salvation Army$8,259
Blackwell Memorial Baptist Church$8,259
Food Bank of The Albemarle$8,259
Philippi Church$6,883
Museum of The Albemarle$6,883
Columbia Christian Church$6,883
Albermarle Hopeline$4,130
JUST GIRLS HEARTS OF THE ALBEMARLE$4,130
Boys and Girls Clubs of The Albemarle$4,130
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%MID-ATLANTIC CHRISTAIN UNIVERSITY: $24k → 15%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE ALBEMARLE: $10k → 16%COLUMBIA CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $8k → 20%SCUPPERNONG CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $13k → 21%SALVATION ARMY: $10k → 14%Mid-Atlantic Christian University: $21k → 15%Boys and Girls Clubs of The Albemarle: $4k → 16%Columbia Christian Church: $7k → 20%Scuppernong Christian Church: $11k → 21%Salvation Army: $8k → 14%MID-ATLANTIC CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $19k → 15%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE ALBEMARLE: $4k → 16%COLUMBIA CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $6k → 20%SCUPPERNONG CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $10k → 21%SALVATION ARMY: $8k → 14%FOOD BANK OF THE ALBEMARLE: $10k → 15%PHILIPPI CHURCH: $8k → 21%BLACKWELL MEMORIAL BAPTIST CHURCH: $10k → 15%Philippi Church: $7k → 21%Blackwell Memorial Baptist Church: $8k → 15%PHILIPPI CHURCH: $6k → 21%Food Bank of The Albemarle: $8k → 15%MUSEUM OF THE ALBEMARLE: $8k → 15%BLACKWELL MEMORIAL BAPTIST CHURCH: $8k → 15%FOOD BANK OF THE ALBEMARLE: $8k → 15%Museum of The Albemarle: $7k → 15%MUSEUM OF THE ALBEMARLE: $6k → 15%JUST GIRLS HEARTS OF THE ALBEMARLE: $4k → 15%JUST GIRLS HEARTS OF THE ALBEMARLE: $4k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$429k · 12 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
0

Total granted

$429k
$0

Still filing today

58%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE COLLEGE OF THE ALBEMARLE FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $150k · revenue +51%
  • MC
    MID-ATLANTIC CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2023–2025 · $64k · revenue +22%
  • MO
    MUSEUM OF THE ALBEMARLE INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $21k · revenue +109%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    3
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    7/7
    Grantees still filing
    6/7
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    THE COLLEGE OF THE ALBEMARLE FOUNDATION INC: $150,122 · EducationTHE COLLEGE OF THE ALBEMARLE FOUNDATION INCMID-ATLANTIC CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $64,338 · EducationMID-ATLANTIC CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITYSCUPPERNONG CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $34,314 · OtherSCUPPERNONG CHRISTIAN CHURCHTHE SALVATION ARMY: $25,735 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYBLACKWELL MEMORIAL BAPTIST CHURCH: $25,735 · OtherBLACKWELL MEMORIAL BAPTIST CHURCHPHILIPPI CHURCH: $21,446 · OtherPHILIPPI CHURCHCOLUMBIA CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $21,446 · OtherCOLUMBIA CHRISTIAN CHURCHALBEMARLE HOPELINE INC: $12,868 · OtherALBEMARLE HOPELINE INCBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE ALBEMARLE INC: $17,754 · Youth DevelopmentJust GirlsHearts of the Albemarle: $7,982 · Youth DevelopmentFOOD BANK OF THE ALBEMARLE: $25,735 · Food & NutritionMUSEUM OF THE ALBEMARLE INC: $21,446 · Arts & Culture
    Education$214,460Other$141,544Youth Development$25,736Food & Nutrition$25,735Arts & Culture$21,446

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE COLLEGE OF THE ALBEMARLE FOUNDATION INC: $150,122 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetMID-ATLANTIC CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $64,338 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ALBEMARLE: $25,735 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMUSEUM OF THE ALBEMARLE INC: $21,446 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE ALBEMARLE INC: $17,754 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetALBEMARLE HOPELINE INC: $12,868 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetJust GirlsHearts of the Albemarle: $7,982 over 2y, 4.1% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds THE COLLEGE OF THE ALBEMARLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
    • Who funds MID-ATLANTIC CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
    • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ALBEMARLE ↗
    • Who funds MUSEUM OF THE ALBEMARLE INC ↗
    • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE ALBEMARLE INC ↗
    • Who funds ALBEMARLE HOPELINE INC ↗
    • Who funds Just GirlsHearts of the Albemarle ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Sentara HealthNorth Carolina Commun…Amazonsmile Foundation
    Sentara HealthVA15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Sentara Health · North Carolina Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Vntc Ttee Jewel and Lee Davenport Charitable funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Vntc Ttee Jewel and Lee Davenport Charitable. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Vntc Ttee Jewel and Lee Davenport’s filings →

      More from the funding graph

      The unnamed billions
      grants reported with no recipient in the public record
      The regranting layer
      51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
      The DAF merry-go-round
      $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
      The endowment market
      who holds foundation money, and what just moved
      The camps
      funders cluster by geography, not ideology
      By state
      where grant money is based, and what stays home