Skip to content

· Public charity

Virginia Daughters of the American Revolution

The virginia daughters of the american revlution is organized for charitable and educational purposes to perpetuate the memory and spirit of the men and women who achieved american independence by preserving historic landmarks and promoting the study of history; to carry out the injunction of george washington in his farewell address to…

$182k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$358kPublic Benefit$60kHuman Services$42kEnvironment$17kSocial Science$15k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $96,584, the rows itemized in this filing. The $181,674 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $85,090 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $85k
$19,733
Median grant
2
States reached
$542k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SEMPER K9 ASSISTANCE DOGS$40,000
BOULDER CREST FOUNDATION$25,000
NATIONAL SOCIETY DAUGHTERS OF THE$19,733
WOODLAWN PLANTATION$6,279
CHILDREN OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION$5,572
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%BOULDER CREST FOUNDATION: $25k → 7%BOULDER CREST FOUNDATION: $17k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$381k · 5 repeat orgs$111k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
4

Total granted

$381k
$105k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+833%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’23’24’25
Arts & CulturePublic BenefitHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MF
    MONTPELIER FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $216k · revenue +80%
  • SK
    SEMPER K9 ASSISTANCE DOGS
    2× · 2023–2025 · $60k · revenue +770%
  • NS
    NATIONAL SOCIETY DAUGHTERS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION
    4× · 2021–2025 · $53k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • SP
    Smithfield Preston Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · $52k · revenue +20%
  • LO
    LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue +833%
  • CO
    County of Rockbridge
    one grant, 2017 · $17k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Association for the Preservation of Va Antiquities

To preserve, promote and serve as an advocate for virginia's irreplaceable historic places for cultural, economic and educational benefits for everyone.

Arts & Culture
2
National Society of the Sons of the American Revolution - Dc Society

The objects of this society are patriotic, historical, educational, and shall include those intended or designed to perpetuate the memory of those patriots who, by their services or sacrifices during the war of the american revolution,…

—
3
The National Society of the Colonial Dames of America

The national society of the colonial dames of america actively promotes our national heritage through historic preservation, patriotic service, and educational projects.

Arts & Culture
4
The Historic Preservation Foundation of North Carolina Inc

Preservation of buildings and sites of historical or architectural importance.

—
5
National Society United States Daughters of 1812

To promote patriotism, preserve and increase knowledge of American history through historic preservation, commemorative events, patriotic education and maintain National Headquarters library and museum of 1784-1815 period memorabilia.

—
6
National Council for Preservation Education
—
7
Society for Military History

Stimulate and advance the study of military history, especially that of the united states of america and to diffuse knowledge thereof by publications, displays and otherwise.

Arts & Culture
8
The North Caroliniana Society

To promote interest in, knowledge of, and appreciation for north carolina history and culture through historical preservation, library service, and perpetuation of state literary and cultural heritage.

—
9
American Civil War Museum Collection

The mission of the american civil war museum collection is to serve as the preeminent world center for the display, study, interpretation, commemoration, and preservation of the history and artifacts of the confederate states of america.

Arts & Culture
10
Saint Peters Landmark Preservation Trust
—
11
Pennsylvania Society of Sons of the Revolution
—
12
National Society of the Sons of the American Revolution

To educate the membership and the general public about the american revolution and its patriots and to foster patriotism and appreciation of american freedoms

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Society Daughters of the American Revolution; the most unlike its peers is Semper K9 Assistance Dogs. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MONTPELIER FOUNDATION: $216,037 · Arts & CultureMONTPELIER FOUNDATIONNATIONAL SOCIETY DAUGHTERS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION: $53,070 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL SOCIETY DAUGHTERS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTIONSmithfield Preston Foundation: $52,440 · Arts & CultureSmithfield Preston Foundation+1 more: $6,279 · Arts & CultureSEMPER K9 ASSISTANCE DOGS: $60,000 · Public BenefitSEMPER K9 ASS…County of Rockbridge: $17,063 · OtherCounty of…CENTER FOR TEACHING THE RULE OF LAW INC: $15,000 · OtherCENTER FO…National Society of the Children of the American Revolution: $10,660 · OtherNational …BOULDER CREST FOUNDATION: $41,500 · Human ServicesBOULDER C…LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Education
Arts & Culture$327,826Public Benefit$60,000Other$42,723Human Services$41,500Education$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMONTPELIER FOUNDATION: $216,037 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetSEMPER K9 ASSISTANCE DOGS: $60,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetNATIONAL SOCIETY DAUGHTERS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION: $53,070 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSmithfield Preston Foundation: $52,440 over 1y, 17% of budgetBOULDER CREST FOUNDATION: $41,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLIBRARY OF VIRGINIA FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetNational Society of the Children of the American Revolution: $10,660 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetNATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES: $6,279 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Virginia Daughters of the American Revolution funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Virginia Daughters of the American Revolution. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Virginia Daughters of the American Revolution?

    Find your warmest path to Virginia Daughters of the American Revolution through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Virginia Daughters of the American Revolution’s filings →

    More from the funding graph