Skip to content

· Public charity

Virginia Crisis Intervention Team Coalition

Supporting crisis intervention teams to improve behavioral health crisis reponse, through community collaboration, training and advocacy.

$1.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
37
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$27,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Arlington Community Services Board$27,500
Piedmont Community Services$27,500
Norfolk Community Services Board$27,500
Portsmouth Department of Behavioral$27,500
Northwestern Community Services Bd$27,500
Hampton Newport News Comm Service$27,500
Middle Penninsula Northern Neck BH$27,500
Alleghany Highlands Comm Services$27,500
VA Beach Department of Human Ser$27,500
Eastern Shore Community Services$27,500
Rockbridge Area Community Services$27,500
Planning District One Behavioral$27,500
Encompass Community Supports$27,500
Colonial Behavioral Health$27,500
Horizon Behavioral Health$27,500
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 83% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Hanover County Community Services: $28k → 5%Fiarfax Falls Church Comm Service: $28k → 6%Arlington Community Services Board: $28k → 7%County of Prince William Comm Serv: $28k → 7%Colonial Behavioral Health: $28k → 7%Chesterfield Community Services: $28k → 7%Waynesboro Police Department: $28k → 8%Encompass Community Supports: $28k → 8%Region Ten Community Services Board: $28k → 8%Chesapeake Integrated Behavioral: $28k → 9%Henrico Area Mental Health: $28k → 9%Northwestern Community Services Bd: $28k → 10%VA Beach Department of Human Ser: $28k → 10%Rockingham County Sheriffs Office: $28k → 11%Highlands Community Services: $28k → 11%Crater Criminal Justice Training: $28k → 11%Western Tidewater Community Service: $28k → 12%Rockbridge Area Community Services: $28k → 12%Middle Penninsula Northern Neck BH: $28k → 12%Horizon Behavioral Health: $28k → 13%Alleghany Highlands Comm Services: $28k → 14%Hampton Newport News Comm Service: $28k → 14%Danville Pittsylvania Community: $28k → 14%Rappahannock Area Community Service: $28k → 15%Crossroads Community Services Board: $28k → 15%Mount Rogers Community Services: $28k → 16%Eastern Shore Community Services: $28k → 16%Piedmont Community Services: $28k → 17%Cumberland Mountain Community Serv: $28k → 18%Norfolk Community Services Board: $28k → 19%Southside Behavioral Health: $28k → 19%Portsmouth Department of Behavioral: $28k → 20%Blue Ridge Behavioral Healthcare: $28k → 20%New River Valley Community Services: $28k → 21%Richmond Behavioral Health: $28k → 22%Planning District One Behavioral: $28k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
03the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/4
Grantees still filing
1/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

+34 more: $935,000 · Other+34 moreHIGHLANDS COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD: $27,500 · HealthHIGHLANDS…CROSSROADS COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD: $27,500 · HealthCROSSROAD…DANVILLE-PITTSYLVANIA COMMUNITY SERVICES: $27,500 · HealthDANVILLE-…
Other$935,000Health$82,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCROSSROADS COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD: $27,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALLEGHANY COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD FOUNDATION: $27,500 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetDANVILLE-PITTSYLVANIA COMMUNITY SERVICES: $27,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HIGHLANDS COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD ↗
  • Who funds ALLEGHANY COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DANVILLE-PITTSYLVANIA COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kovar CorporationVA24× affinity9 shared granteesties to 2 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kovar Corporation · Sentara Health · Center for Technology and Civic Life · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Virginia Crisis Intervention Team Coalition funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Virginia Crisis Intervention Team Coalition. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Virginia Crisis Intervention Team Coalition’s filings →

    More from the funding graph