Skip to content
Vincentian Cares Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Vincentian Cares Inc

To transform lives through love and service.

$29M
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$335k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $1,136,830, the rows itemized in this filing. The $28,572,642 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $27,435,812 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $41k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $760k
  • $250k+1 grant · $335k
$160,207
Median grant
1
States reached
$52M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOLEY CENTERS$335,303
TAMPA HILLSBOROUGH HOMELESS INITIATIVE INC$224,726
HOMELESS LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE OF PINELLAS$180,332
COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS OF PASCO COUNTY$160,207
HOMELESS COALITION OF POLK COUNTY$97,720
GULF COAST PARTNERSHIP INC$97,333
211 TAMPA BAY CARES$30,000
COLLIER COUNTY HUNGER & HOMELESS COALITION$11,209
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $162k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 9% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COLLIER COUNTY HUNGER & HOMELESS COALITON: $136k → 10%MID FLORIDA HOMELESS COALITION: $15k → 17%COLLIER COUNTY HUNGER & HOMELESS COALITION: $11k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 7 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
1

Total granted

$2.1M
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+26%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BOLEY CENTERS INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $698k · revenue +13%
  • HL
    HOMELESS LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE OF PINELLAS INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $411k · revenue +17%
  • TH
    TAMPA HILLSBOROUGH HOMELESS INITIATIVE INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $310k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • MF
    MID FLORIDA HOMELESS COALITION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue +26%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Florida Commission On Homelessness Inc

The corporation is organized for the purpose of permanently reducing the number of homeless individuals and families in the central florida region.

—
2
Suncoast Partnership to End Homelessness

As lead agency for the sarasota/manatee continuum of care, suncoast partnership collaborates with providers of services and housing for those who are homeless and those at imminent risk of homelessness. we receive and distribute grants,…

Human Services
3
Volusiaflagler County Coalition for the Homeless Inc

Charitable or educational purposes related to services for persons experiencing homelessness and persons at risk of homelessness in the service area. in pursuance of the foregoing purposes, vfcch shall facilitate and coordinate the…

Human Services
4
Florida Housing Coalition Inc

The florida housing coalition, inc., is a nonprofit, statewide membership organization whose mission is to bring together housing advocates and resources so that all floridians have a quality affordable home and suitable living…

—
5
Brevard Homeless Coalition Inc

The mission of the brevard homeless coalition is to provide a framework of services to prevent and eliminate homelessness in brevard county.

Human Services
6
Homeless Services Network of Central Florida Inc

The homeless services network of central florida is the lead agency for the hud continuum of care supportive housing program, shelter, and care funding for osceola, seminole, and orange counties including the city of orlando. it…

Human Services
7
Florida Coalition for the Homeless Inc

The Coalition is to eliminate homelessness by providing education on homelessness issues, advocating for issues that help homeless people, networking with advocates throughout Florida, and promoting involvement

—
8
Central Louisiana Coalition to Prevent Homelessness Inc

To identify, advocate, and mobilize community resources to ensure all people in central louisiana have access to stable homes.

Housing & Shelter
9
Taskforce Fore Ending Homelessness Inc

To get our neighbors experiencing homelessness off the street through proactive outreach and services and provide placement in a program that will help them get "home."

Human Services
10
Neighborhood Housing Services of South Florida

To develop sustainable housing, finance new homebuyers, educate current and prospective homebuyers

—
11
First Step Shelter Inc

To develop, manage and operate the First Step Shelter Program, a homeless assistance service program and shelter in Volusia County, Florida.

Housing & Shelter
12
The Local Community Housing Corporation

Local Community Housing Corporation (LCHC) is a nonprofit agency and its mission is to manage and provide affordable housing and facilitate services that promotes stability for children, individuals and families and upward mobility for…

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Homeless Leadership Alliance of Pinellas Inc; the most unlike its peers is 211 Tampa Bay Cares Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOMELESS LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE OF PINELLAS INC: $410,941 · OtherHOMELESS LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE OF PINELLAS IN…COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS OF PASCO: $248,414 · OtherCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS OF PASCOHOMELESS COALITION OF POLK COUNTY FLORIDA: $177,848 · OtherHOMELESS COALITION OF POLK COUNTY FLORIDABOLEY CENTERS INC: $697,859 · HealthBOLEY CENTERS INCTAMPA HILLSBOROUGH HOMELESS INITIATIVE INC: $309,703 · Human ServicesTAMPA HILLSBOROUGH HOMEL…SOUTHWEST FLORIDA REGIONAL COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS INC: $146,844 · Human ServicesSOUTHWEST FLORIDA REGION…+1 more: $14,954 · Human ServicesGULF COAST PARTNERSHIP INC: $152,050 · Housing & Shelter211 Tampa Bay Cares Inc: $30,000 · Community Improvement
Other$837,203Health$697,859Human Services$471,501Housing & Shelter$152,050Community Improvement$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOLEY CENTERS INC: $697,859 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetHOMELESS LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE OF PINELLAS INC: $410,941 over 2y, 7.9% of budgetTAMPA HILLSBOROUGH HOMELESS INITIATIVE INC: $309,703 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS OF PASCO: $248,414 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetHOMELESS COALITION OF POLK COUNTY FLORIDA: $177,848 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetGULF COAST PARTNERSHIP INC: $152,050 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetSOUTHWEST FLORIDA REGIONAL COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS INC: $146,844 over 2y, 7.4% of budget211 Tampa Bay Cares Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMID FLORIDA HOMELESS COALITION INC: $14,954 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Vincentian Cares Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Vincentian Cares Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 28%
  • Tampa Hillsborough Homeless Initiative Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Homeless Leadership Alliance of Pinellas Inc: 31% of income from government
  • Gulf Coast Partnership Inc: 28% of income from government
  • Boley Centers Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Southwest Florida Regional Coalition to End Homelessness Inc: 14% of income from government
  • Mid Florida Homeless Coalition Inc: 13% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Vincentian Cares’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home