Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Vincent J & Barbara Smith Giffuni Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$90k
Granted FY2022
3
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 47% of VINCENT J & BARBARA SMITH GIFFUNI FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2022 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$40,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$23k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTH SEA FIRE DEPT$40,000
Individual grant recipient$40,000
PUSH TO WALK$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%OPUS BONO SACERDOTII: $500 → 10%CHRISTIAN APPALACJIAN PROJECT: $500 → 26%COVENANT HOUSE: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MO
KY
VA
MD
KS
TN
DC
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

37%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$55k · 3 repeat orgs$91k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2022, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
37

Total granted

$55k
$51k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+75%

Still filing today

100%
49%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’22
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalFood & NutritionPublic Safety & DisasterPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NS
    NORTH SEA FIRE DEPARTMENT INC
    3× · 2017–2022 · $41k · revenue -14%
  • PT
    Push To Walk a New Jersey Non-Profit Corporation
    2× · 2017–2022 · $13k · revenue +33%
  • SV
    SOUTHAMPTON VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE INC
    2× · 2017–2019 · $1k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • HF
    HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • VC
    VARIOUS CONTRIBUTIONS UNDER 300
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • PW
    PARTNERING WITH THE POOR
    one grant, 2017 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
Samaritan Hospital

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. samaritan hospital is a member of st. peter's health partners and…

Health
3
St Joseph's Medical Pc

We, st. joseph's medical and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. st. joseph's medical is a member of st. joseph's health and trinity health.

Health
4
St Joseph's Physician Health Pc

We, st. joseph's physician health and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.

Health
5
St Peter's Health Partners

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.

Health
6
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
St Peter's Hospital

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. st. peter's hospital is a member of st. peter's health partners and…

Health
10
St Peter's Health Partners Medical Associates Pc

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.st. peter's health partners medical associates is a member of st.…

Health
11
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Medical Mission Board Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Farmland Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyVolunteer Fire DepartmentsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Homeless Services & ShelterSenior Support ServicesFood Pantries & AssistanceCommunity Health CentersChild and Family ServicesCancer Support OrganizationsVeteran Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 52 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%4%10–20yr19%26%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%44%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%15%10–20yr19%57%20–35yr13%5%35–55yr16%23%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,735

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
19/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY — $10,000 · OtherHOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERYVARIOUS CONTRIBUTIONS UNDER 300 — $5,385 · OtherVARIOUS CONTRIBUTIONS UNDER 300+22 more — $19,850 · Other+22 moreNORTH SEA FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $40,750 · Public Safety & DisasterNORTH SEA FIRE DEPARTMENT INCPush To Walk a New Jersey Non-Profit Corporation — $12,500 · HealthPush To Walk a…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $2,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDR…SOUTHAMPTON VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE INC — $1,250 · HealthSOUTHAMPTON VO…ST FRANCIS FRIENDS OF THE POOR INC — $1,000 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $1,000 · HealthTHE SOUTHAMPTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · HealthTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $10,000 · EducationWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $2,500 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE — $1,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $1,000 · Human ServicesOPUS BONO SACERDOTII — $500 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC — $500 · Human ServicesSUDAN RELIEF FUND INC — $2,500 · InternationalCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC — $1,000 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $500 · InternationalCOAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · Public Benefit
Other$75,235Public Safety & Disaster$40,750Health$19,250Education$10,000Human Services$5,500International$4,000Public Benefit$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNORTH SEA FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $40,750 over 3y, 15% of budgetPush To Walk a New Jersey Non-Profit Corporation — $12,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHAMPTON VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE INC — $1,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST FRANCIS FRIENDS OF THE POOR INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SOUTHAMPTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPUS BONO SACERDOTII — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTANLEY M ISAACS NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChristian Herald Association Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUFFOLK COUNTY POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Vincent J & Barbara Smith Giffuni Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Vincent J & Barbara Smith Giffuni Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Vincent J & Barbara Smith Giffuni Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2023) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph