Skip to content
Vijayasekhara Reddy Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Vijayasekhara Reddy Foundation Inc

$3k
Granted FY2021
18
Grants FY2021
12
States reached
$720
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2021.

International$2kHuman Services$920Health$400Public Safety & Disaster$205Food & Nutrition$200Religion$100
02FY2021 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$50
Median grant
12
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILD REACH$720
CHILDREN INTERNATIONAL$720
CHILDREN INC$720
AMERICAN RED CROSS$105
PROJECT HOPE$100
0XFAM AMERICA$100
FOOD FOR THE POOR INC$50
SAVE THE CHILDREN$50
MOTHERS AGAINST DRUNK DRIVING$50
MARCH OF DIMES$50
UNICEF USA$50
GEORGIA SHERIFF'S YOUTH HOMES INC$50
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$50
CARE$50
FEED THE CHILDREN$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GEORGIA SHERIFF'S YOUTH HOMES INC: $50 → 8%GEORGIA SHERIFF'S YOUTH HOMES INC: $50 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
MA
RI
MO
WV
VA
AZ
TN
DC
OK
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

35%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1k · 12 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
3

Total granted

$1k
$200

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-4%
+16%

Still filing today

58%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 23% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21
InternationalHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $200 · revenue +53%
  • COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $100 · revenue +37%
  • ES
    EASTER SEALS SOUTHERN GEORGIA INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $100 · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • OXFAM-AMERICA INC
    one grant, 2020 · $100 · revenue +16%
  • United States Association for UNHCR
    one grant, 2020 · $50 · revenue -1%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50 · revenue +53%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Heartlink

We save children's lives by transforming pediatric heart care in underserved parts of the world.

—
2
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
3
Food for the Hungry Inc

Food for the hungry is a christian humanitarian aid and global development organization that has designed, developed and delivered solutions for more than 50 years so that children, families and communities can flourish. (continued on…

International
4
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Inc

To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.

Health
5
Compassion International Incorporated

Compassion exists to release children from poverty in Jesus' name. Compassion serves all children, regardless of religion, race, ethnicity, or gender.

International
6
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
7
Intrahealth International Inc

Our mission is to improve the performance of health workers and strengthen the systems in which they work.

Health
8
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
9
Childfund Alliance

Childfund alliance is a global network of 11 child-focused development and humanitarian organizations working in more than 70 countries. we help nearly 30 million children and their families to overcome poverty and the underlying…

International
10
Human Rights Watch Inc

Human rights watch ("hrw") defends the rights of people worldwide. we scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. human rights watch is an independent,…

International
11
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
12
World Vision Inc

World vision, inc. is a christian humanitarian organization dedicated to working with children, families, and their communities worldwide to reach their full potential by tackling the causes of poverty and injustice. (continued on schedule…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children International; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
5/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Children International: $720 · InternationalChildren InternationalCHILDREN INCORPORATED: $720 · InternationalCHILDREN INCORPORATEDPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $200 · InternationalPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INCFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $100 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $100 · InternationalOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $100 · InternationalFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $100 · International+1 more: $50 · InternationalCHILD REACH: $720 · OtherCHILD REACHAMERICAN RED CROSS: $205 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSSAVE THE CHILDREN: $100 · OtherSAVE THE CHILDRENTHE SALVATION ARMY: $100 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYMOTHERS AGAINST DRUNK DRIVING: $100 · OtherMOTHERS AGAINST DRUNK DRIVINGST JUDE: $100 · OtherST JUDE0XFAM AMERICA: $100 · Other0XFAM AMERICA+2 more: $100 · Other+2 moreMARCH OF DIMES INC: $100 · HealthEASTER SEALS SOUTHERN GEORGIA INC: $100 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $50 · HealthGEORGIA SHERIFFS' YOUTH HOMES INC: $100 · Human Services
International$2,090Other$1,525Health$250Human Services$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChildren International: $720 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN INCORPORATED: $720 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEASTER SEALS SOUTHERN GEORGIA INC: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA SHERIFFS' YOUTH HOMES INC: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Vijayasekhara Reddy Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Vijayasekhara Reddy Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Feed the Children Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2023) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Vijayasekhara Reddy’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home