Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Vijayasekhara Reddy Foundation Inc

$3k
Granted FY2021
18
Grants FY2021
12
States reached
$720
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202021.

International$2kHuman Services$920Health$400Public Safety & Disaster$205Food & Nutrition$200Religion$100
02FY2021 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$50
Median grant
12
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$720
CHILDREN INTERNATIONAL$720
CHILDREN INC$720
AMERICAN RED CROSS$105
0XFAM AMERICA$100
PROJECT HOPE$100
FOOD FOR THE POOR INC$50
SAVE THE CHILDREN$50
MOTHERS AGAINST DRUNK DRIVING$50
MARCH OF DIMES$50
UNICEF USA$50
GEORGIA SHERIFF'S YOUTH HOMES INC$50
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$50
CARE$50
FEED THE CHILDREN$50
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GEORGIA SHERIFF'S YOUTH HOMES INC: $50 → 8%GEORGIA SHERIFF'S YOUTH HOMES INC: $50 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
MA
RI
MO
WV
VA
AZ
TN
DC
OK
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

35%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1k · 12 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
3

Total granted

$1k
$200

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-4%
+3%

Still filing today

58%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 23% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21
InternationalHealthHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $200 · revenue +53%
  • COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $100 · revenue +37%
  • ES
    EASTER SEALS SOUTHERN GEORGIA INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $100 · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • OXFAM-AMERICA INC
    one grant, 2020 · $100 · revenue +3%
  • United States Association for UNHCR
    one grant, 2020 · $50 · revenue -9%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50 · revenue +53%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Heartlink

We save children's lives by transforming pediatric heart care in underserved parts of the world.

2
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
3
Food for the Hungry Inc

Food for the hungry is a christian humanitarian aid and global development organization that has designed, developed and delivered solutions for more than 50 years so that children, families and communities can flourish. (continued on…

International
4
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Inc

To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.

Health
5
Compassion International Incorporated

Compassion exists to release children from poverty in Jesus' name. Compassion serves all children, regardless of religion, race, ethnicity, or gender.

International
6
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
7
Intrahealth International Inc

Our mission is to improve the performance of health workers and strengthen the systems in which they work.

Health
8
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
9
Childfund Alliance

Childfund alliance is a global network of 11 child-focused development and humanitarian organizations working in more than 70 countries. we help nearly 30 million children and their families to overcome poverty and the underlying…

International
10
Human Rights Watch Inc

Human rights watch ("hrw") defends the rights of people worldwide. we scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. human rights watch is an independent,…

International
11
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
12
World Vision Inc

World vision, inc. is a christian humanitarian organization dedicated to working with children, families, and their communities worldwide to reach their full potential by tackling the causes of poverty and injustice. (continued on schedule…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children International and the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
5/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHILDREN INCORPORATED — $720 · InternationalCHILDREN INCORPORATEDChildren International — $720 · InternationalChildren InternationalPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $200 · InternationalPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INCCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $100 · InternationalOXFAM-AMERICA INC — $100 · InternationalFEED THE CHILDREN INC — $100 · InternationalFOOD FOR THE POOR INC — $100 · International+1 more — $50 · InternationalIndividual grant recipient — $720 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAMERICAN RED CROSS — $205 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSMOTHERS AGAINST DRUNK DRIVING — $100 · OtherMOTHERS AGAINST DRUNK DRIVING0XFAM AMERICA — $100 · Other0XFAM AMERICAST JUDE — $100 · OtherST JUDESAVE THE CHILDREN — $100 · OtherSAVE THE CHILDRENTHE SALVATION ARMY — $100 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY+2 more — $100 · Other+2 moreMARCH OF DIMES INC — $100 · HealthEASTER SEALS SOUTHERN GEORGIA INC — $100 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc — $50 · HealthGEORGIA SHERIFFS' YOUTH HOMES INC — $100 · Human Services
International$2,090Other$1,525Health$250Human Services$100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHILDREN INCORPORATED — $720 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren International — $720 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC — $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC — $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEASTER SEALS SOUTHERN GEORGIA INC — $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA SHERIFFS' YOUTH HOMES INC — $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Vijayasekhara Reddy Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Feed the Children Inc1% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc0% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2023) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph