Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Vigran Family Foundation Inc

The vigran family foundation supports the charitable purposes of the wayne county indiana foundation and especially those advancing theater and the arts, higher education, healthcare and jewish causes.

$93k
Granted FY2017
5
Grants FY2017
2
States reached
$8k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

59% of Vigran Family Foundation Inc’s FY2023 grant dollars went to Wayne County Indiana Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 4 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2017, the last year Vigran Family Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $30k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

5
17
4
18
3
19
3
20
1
21
2
22
4
23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Philanthropy$80kArts & Culture$27kEducation$25kReligion$22kCommunity Improvement$10kHuman Services$8kFood & Nutrition$5k
02FY2017 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 5 grants below total $30,250 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $93,400 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $63,150 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$5,250
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF WHITEWATER VALLEY$7,500
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF CINCINNATI$7,500
BETH BORUK TEMPLE$5,250
RICHMOND CIVIC THEATRE$5,000
MIAMI UNIVERSITY$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WAYNE COUNTY IN FOUNDATION INC: $34k → 18%MIAMI UNIVERSITY: $5k → 12%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF CINCINNATI: $8k → 16%UNITED WAY OF WHITEWATER VALLEY: $15k → 18%MIAMI UNIVERSITY: $5k → 12%UNITED WAY OF WHITEWATER VALLEY: $11k → 18%EVERY CHILD CAN READ: $8k → 18%UNITED WAY OF WHITEWATER VALLEY: $8k → 18%UNITED WAY OF WHITEWATER VALLEY: $8k → 18%BETH BORUK TEMPLE: $7k → 18%RICHMOND CIVIC THEATRE: $6k → 18%EVERY CHILD CAN READ INC: $6k → 18%EVERY CHILD CAN READ INC: $6k → 18%EARLHAM COLLEGE: $6k → 18%RICHMOND CIVIC THEATRE: $6k → 18%BETH BORUK TEMPLE: $5k → 18%BETH BORUK TEMPLE: $5k → 18%BETH BORUK TEMPLE: $5k → 18%GATEWAY HUNGER RELIEF CENTER: $5k → 18%RICHMOND CIVIC THEATRE: $5k → 18%UNITED WAY OF WHITEWATER VALLEY: $5k → 18%RICHMOND CIVIC THEATRE: $5k → 18%RICHMOND CIVIC THEATRE: $5k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$124k · 5 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2017, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2017 (too recent to call). Read against FY2017, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
3

Total granted

$124k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+58%

Still filing today

80%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
EducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF WHITEWATER VALLEY INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $46k · revenue -68%
  • RC
    RICHMOND CIVIC THEATRE INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $27k · revenue +39%
  • RJ
    RICHMOND JEWISH CONGREGATION BETH BORUK TEMPLE
    4× · 2017–2023 · $22k

Funded once

  • JC
    Jewish Community Center Of Cincinnatigraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +58%
  • EC
    Earlham College Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue +19%
  • GC
    GATEWAY CHURCH OF RICHMOND INC
    one grant, 2020 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNITED WAY OF WHITEWATER VALLEY INC — $46,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF WHITEWATER VALLEY INCWAYNE COUNTY INDIANA FOUNDATION INC — $33,572 · PhilanthropyWAYNE COUNTY INDIANA FOUNDATION INCEVERY CHILD CAN READ INC — $19,500 · EducationEVERY CHILD CAN READ I…Miami University Foundation — $10,000 · EducationMiami University Found…Earlham College Inc — $5,500 · EducationEarlham College IncRICHMOND JEWISH CONGREGATION BETH BORUK TEMPLE — $22,250 · OtherRICHMOND JEWISH C…GATEWAY CHURCH OF RICHMOND INC — $5,000 · OtherGATEWAY CHURCH OF…RICHMOND CIVIC THEATRE INC — $26,500 · Arts & CultureRICHMOND CIVIC TH…Jewish Community Center Of Cincinnati — $7,500 · Recreation & Sports
Philanthropy$79,572Education$35,000Other$27,250Arts & Culture$26,500Recreation & Sports$7,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF WHITEWATER VALLEY INC — $46,000 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetWAYNE COUNTY INDIANA FOUNDATION INC — $33,572 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRICHMOND CIVIC THEATRE INC — $26,500 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetEVERY CHILD CAN READ INC — $19,500 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetJewish Community Center Of Cincinnati — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEarlham College Inc — $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

First Bank Richmond Inc Community FoundationIN13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: First Bank Richmond Inc Community Foundation · Wayne County Indiana Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Vigran Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Vigran Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Vigran Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph