Skip to content

· Public charity

Veterans Education and Research Association of Northern New England Inc

The principal mission of veranne, as outlined in the authorization by congress under 38 usc 7361-7366, is to a provide a flexible funding mechanism to support the conduct of va-authorized research and education at its partner va medical centers.

$389k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$162k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Health$657kScience & Tech$183kEducation$45k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $129k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $256k
$27,214
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UT SOUTHWESTERN$162,469
MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA$93,106
TRUSTEES OF DARTMOUTH COLLEGE$45,383
BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF NEW MEXICO$27,214
BOSTON UNIVERSITY$20,831
BAY PINES FOUNDATION$17,907
VETERANS RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION ST LOUIS$17,554
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY24–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 28% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $21k → 16%UT SOUTHWESTERN: $162k → 14%BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF NEW MEXICO: $27k → 14%MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $93k → 12%BAY PINES FOUNDATION: $18k → 12%VETERANS RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION ST LOUIS: $18k → 21%WATTS BRADLEYDOD PRIME PTSD W81XWH22C0147 - 0011802093: $238k → 6%SCHROECK FREPLACING INVASIVE CYTOSCOPY 1R37CA27591: $201k → 8%TRUSTEES OF DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $45k → 10%SHINER BDOD#2-REAL WORLD STUDY - W81XWH-22-1-0641: $62k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MA
MO
MD
NM
SC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
0/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WATTS BRADLEYDOD PRIME PTSD W81XWH22C0147 - 0011802093: $237,961 · OtherWATTS BRADLEYDOD PRIME PTSD W81XWH22C0147 - 0011802093SCHROECK FREPLACING INVASIVE CYTOSCOPY 1R37CA27591: $201,058 · OtherSCHROECK FREPLACING INVASIVE CYTOSCOPY 1R37CA27591THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTE: $162,469 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTEPHI CHI MEDICAL FRATERNITY INC: $93,106 · OtherPHI CHI MEDICAL FRATERNITY INCSHINER BDOD#2-REAL WORLD STUDY - W81XWH-22-1-0641: $62,415 · OtherSHINER BDOD#2-REAL WORLD STUDY - W81XWH-22-1-0641+2 more: $38,385 · OtherTrustees of Dartmouth College: $45,383 · EducationBiomedical Research Institute of New Mexico: $27,214 · HealthBAY PINES FOUNDATION INC: $17,907 · Health
Other$795,394Education$45,383Health$45,121

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College: $45,383 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBiomedical Research Institute of New Mexico: $27,214 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $20,831 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAY PINES FOUNDATION INC: $17,907 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetVETERANS RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF ST LOUIS: $17,554 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Veterans Education and Research Association of Northern New England Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Veterans Education and Research Association of Northern New England Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Veterans Education and Research Association of Northern New England’s filings →

More from the funding graph