Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Veterans Education and Research Association of Northern New England Inc

The principal mission of veranne, as outlined in the authorization by congress under 38 usc 7361-7366, is to a provide a flexible funding mechanism to support the conduct of va-authorized research and education at its partner va medical centers.

$389k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$162k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 90% of VETERANS EDUCATION AND RESEARCH ASSOCIATION OF NORTHERN NEW ENGLAND INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $129k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $256k
$27,214
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UT SOUTHWESTERN$162,469
MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA$93,106
TRUSTEES OF DARTMOUTH COLLEGE$45,383
BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF NEW MEXICO$27,214
BOSTON UNIVERSITY$20,831
BAY PINES FOUNDATION$17,907
VETERANS RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION ST LOUIS$17,554
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY24–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 28% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $21k → 16%UT SOUTHWESTERN: $162k → 14%BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF NEW MEXICO: $27k → 14%MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $93k → 12%BAY PINES FOUNDATION: $18k → 12%VETERANS RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION ST LOUIS: $18k → 21%WATTS BRADLEYDOD PRIME PTSD W81XWH22C0147 - 0011802093: $238k → 6%SCHROECK FREPLACING INVASIVE CYTOSCOPY 1R37CA27591: $201k → 8%TRUSTEES OF DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $45k → 10%SHINER BDOD#2-REAL WORLD STUDY - W81XWH-22-1-0641: $62k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
MA
MO
MD
NM
SC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
0/5
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WATTS BRADLEYDOD PRIME PTSD W81XWH22C0147 - 0011802093 — $237,961 · OtherWATTS BRADLEYDOD PRIME PTSD W81XWH22C0147 - 0011802093SCHROECK FREPLACING INVASIVE CYTOSCOPY 1R37CA27591 — $201,058 · OtherSCHROECK FREPLACING INVASIVE CYTOSCOPY 1R37CA27591THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTE — $162,469 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTEPHI CHI MEDICAL FRATERNITY INC — $93,106 · OtherPHI CHI MEDICAL FRATERNITY INCSHINER BDOD#2-REAL WORLD STUDY - W81XWH-22-1-0641 — $62,415 · OtherSHINER BDOD#2-REAL WORLD STUDY - W81XWH-22-1-0641+2 more — $38,385 · OtherTrustees of Dartmouth College — $45,383 · EducationBiomedical Research Institute of New Mexico — $27,214 · HealthBAY PINES FOUNDATION INC — $17,907 · Health
Other$795,394Education$45,383Health$45,121

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College — $45,383 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBiomedical Research Institute of New Mexico — $27,214 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $20,831 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAY PINES FOUNDATION INC — $17,907 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetVETERANS RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF ST LOUIS — $17,554 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Veterans Education and Research Association of Northern New England Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Trustees of Boston University12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph