Skip to content

· Private foundation

Vern and Loma Wegerer Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$44k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$76kHuman Services$36kEducation$32kHealth$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$505Youth Development$355Public Benefit$286Philanthropy$250Other$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $32k
$50
Median grant
6
States reached
$30k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Friendship Manor$21,800
Jordan Catholic School$10,000
St Leo's Catholic Church$5,500
Saint Pius X$4,470
Catholic Diocese of Peoria$825
St Vincent Depaul$375
Franciscan Sisters of John the Bapt$300
Knights of Columbus$136
American Legion$93
Moline Public Library$50
K-State Alumni$50
Divine Mercy$50
Alleman High School$50
Individual grant recipient$45
EM Optimist Club$45
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Friendship Manor: $22k → 15%Friendship Manor: $6k → 15%Friendship Manor: $3k → 15%Friendship Manor: $2k → 15%Friendship Manor: $1k → 15%Friendship Manor: $1k → 15%Friendship Manor: $727 → 15%Friendship Manor: $200 → 15%William Butterworth Fdn: $500 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
IA
OH
PA
CA
CO
VA
KS
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$141k · 23 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
23

Total granted

$141k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+46%

Still filing today

26%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FM
    FRIENDSHIP MANOR INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $35k · revenue +30%
  • KS
    KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2023 · $16k · revenue +107%
  • PR
    PREGNANCY RESOURCES
    6× · 2017–2022 · $1k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • SM
    St Marys Church
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • WB
    WILLIAM BUTTERWORTH FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $500 · revenue +94%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $225
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Albertson Parkinsons Research
Health
2
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
3
Banner Alzheimer's Foundation

Established in 2006, the banner alzheimer's foundation (baf) secures and stewards charitable gifts to advance the mission of banner alzheimer's institute (bai), including groundbreaking research initiatives and pioneering prevention…

Health
4
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
5
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
6
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
7
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
8
American Neuromuscular Foundation

The american neuromuscular foundation was established to improve the quality of care for people with disorders of skeletal muscle, neuromuscular function, and central and peripheral nervous systems through the promotion of research and…

Health
9
Benedictine College

Benedictine college's mission as a catholic, benedictine, liberal arts, residential college is the education of men and women within a community of faith & scholarship.

Education
10
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
11
American Association of Physicists in Medicine

Advancing medicine through excellence in the science, education and professional practice of medical physics. the mission is carried out through driving scientific and clinical innovation in medical physics to improve human health,…

Science & Tech
12
Breakthrough Prize in Life Sciences Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Aarp Foundation; the most unlike its peers is William Butterworth Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Saint Pius X: $57,627 · OtherSaint Pius XJordan Catholic School: $12,100 · OtherJordan Catholic SchoolCATHOLIC DIOCESE OF PEORIA: $6,001 · OtherCATHOLIC DIOCESE OF PEORIASt Leo's Catholic Church: $5,500 · OtherSt Leo's Catholic ChurchFranciscan Sisters of John the Bapt: $3,900 · OtherAlleman High School: $3,765 · Other+38 more: $7,902 · Other+38 moreFRIENDSHIP MANOR INC: $35,167 · Human ServicesFRIENDSHIP MANOR INC+2 more: $568 · Human ServicesKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $15,690 · EducationKANSAS STAT…PREGNANCY RESOURCES: $1,425 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $165 · Health+1 more: $15 · HealthYOUNG LIFE: $250 · Youth DevelopmentMEALS ON WHEELS: $25 · Food & Nutrition
Other$96,795Human Services$35,735Education$15,690Health$1,605Youth Development$250Food & Nutrition$25

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDSHIP MANOR INC: $35,167 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $15,690 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPREGNANCY RESOURCES: $1,425 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS Fr McGivney Council #8002: $1,211 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetWILLIAM BUTTERWORTH FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $165 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAARP FOUNDATION: $68 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN PARKINSON DISEASE ASSOC: $15 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP MANOR INC ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PREGNANCY RESOURCES ↗
  • Who funds KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS Fr McGivney Council #8002 ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM BUTTERWORTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds AARP FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Moline FoundationIL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Moline Foundation · Quad Cities Golf Classic Charitable Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Vern and Loma Wegerer Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Vern and Loma Wegerer Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Vern and Loma Wegerer Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph