Skip to content
Vermont Recovery Network Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Vermont Recovery Network Inc

To support our member recovery organizations such that they can be world class establishments empowering individual vermonters and their families who are in recovery from an alcohol and other substance use disorders.

$45k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$521kRecreation & Sports$194kPublic Safety & Disaster$7k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $6,883, the rows itemized in this filing. The $45,293 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $38,410 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$6,883
Median grant
1
States reached
$174k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TURNING POINT CENTER OF BENNINGTON$6,883
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%TURNING POINT CENTER OF FRANKLIN COUNTY: $2k → 9%TURNING POINT CENTER OF SPRINGFIELD: $8k → 9%TURNING POINT CENTER OF ADDISON CNT: $6k → 9%NORTH CENTRAL VERMONT RECOVERY CENTER: $2k → 9%TURNING POINT CENTER OF CENTRAL VERMONT: $100k → 9%TURNING POINT CENTER OF CHITTENDEN COUNTY: $98k → 10%TURNING POINT CENTER OF BENNINGTON COUNTY: $100k → 11%KINGDOM RECOVERY CENTER: $2k → 12%TURNING POINT CENTER OF RUTLAND COUNTY: $2k → 12%JOURNEY TO RECOVERY COMM CTR: $93k → 14%TURNING POINT RECOVERY CENTER OF SPRINGFIELD: $2k → 9%TURNING POINT CENTER OF ADDISON COUNTY: $2k → 9%TURNING POINT CENTER OF CENTRAL VERMONT: $95k → 9%TURNING POINT CENTER OF CHITTENDEN COUNTY: $95k → 10%TURNING POINT CENTER OF BENNINGTON COUNTY: $95k → 11%JOURNEY TO RECOVERY COMMUNITY CENTER: $2k → 14%UPPER VALLEY TURNING POINT: $2k → 9%TURNING POINT CENTER OF CENTRAL VT: $6k → 9%TURNING POINT CENTER OF CHITTENDEN COUNTY: $2k → 10%TURNING POINT CENTER OF BENNINGTON: $7k → 11%TURNING POINT CENTER OF CENTRAL VERMONT: $2k → 9%TURNING POINT CENTER OF BENNINGTON COUNTY: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$609k · 5 repeat orgs$113k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +305% since the first grant, against +86% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
8

Total granted

$609k
$106k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+305%
+86%

Still filing today

80%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’23’24
HealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    TURNING POINT CENTER OF CENTRAL VERMONT INC
    4× · 2018–2023 · $202k · revenue +305% · 38% of their budget
  • TP
    TURNING POINT CENTER OF CHITTENDEN COUNTY INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $194k · revenue +39%
  • TP
    Turning Point Recovery Center of Springfield VT Inc
    2× · 2020–2023 · $10k · revenue +159%

Funded once

  • JT
    JOURNEY TO RECOVERY COMM CTR
    one grant, 2017 · $93k
  • TP
    TURNING POINT CENTER OF RUTLAND COUNTY
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • TP
    TURNING POINT CENTER OF WINDHAM COUNTY
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Turning Point Foundation

To provide christian-based recovery and counselling programs to the general public for individuals with drug or alcohol addictions.

Health
2
Turning Point Recovery Centers

Improve the quality of life in the individual and community by empowering people to recover from addictions by providing high quality, accessible and affordable substance abuse treatment and rehabilitation services.

—
3
The Turning Point of South Carolina Inc

Our Mission is to provide a structured, safe and secure residential setting in which people may recover from substance addiction physically, mentally and spiritually and reconnect with their families and community.

Housing & Shelter
4
Riverside Turning Point Inc
Youth Development
5
Turning Point Christian Center Inc

Turning point is a cutting edge, 15 month, faith-based residential men's program which provides healing from life-controlling addictions. our vision is to see every person with an alcohol or substance abuse addiction freed, restored and…

Health
6
Recovery Communities of North Carolina Inc
Human Services
7
Malvern Center

Malvern Center is a clubhouse that provides meetings for Alcoholic Anonymous, Narcotics Anonymous, other addictions and 12 step programs.

—
8
Wabash Valley Recovery Center
Health
9
Turning Point of Windam County

Turning Point of Windham Countys mission is to support and improve the health and wellbeing of individuals in our community who are experiencing any stage of recovery from harmful substance use and addition. We do this through…

Health
10
The Bridge Center Recovery

To provide a safe and structured environment for addicts and alcoholics to come and find hope and restoration.

Human Services
11
Turning Point Counseling Inc

To serve the body of christ by restoring the saints, growing the church and supporting leadership. our desire is to bring emotional, relational and spiritual health to those inside and outside the body of christ.

Religion
12
Crossroads Recovery House
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Turning Point Center of Bennington Inc; the most unlike its peers is Kingdom Recovery Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
9/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TURNING POINT CENTER OF BENNINGTON COUNTY: $195,808 · OtherTURNING POINT CENTER OF BENNINGTON COUNTYJOURNEY TO RECOVERY COMM CTR: $93,016 · OtherJOURNEY TO RECOVERY COMM CTR+5 more: $15,000 · OtherTURNING POINT CENTER OF CENTRAL VERMONT INC: $201,733 · HealthTURNING POINT CENTER OF CENTRAL VER…Turning Point Recovery Center of Springfield VT Inc: $10,108 · Health+4 more: $12,305 · Health+4 moreTURNING POINT CENTER OF CHITTENDEN COUNTY INC: $193,808 · Recreation & SportsTURNING POINT CENTER OF CHITTE…
Other$303,824Health$224,146Recreation & Sports$193,808

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTURNING POINT CENTER OF CENTRAL VERMONT INC: $201,733 over 4y, 38% of budgetTURNING POINT CENTER OF CHITTENDEN COUNTY INC: $193,808 over 3y, 12% of budgetTurning Point Recovery Center of Springfield VT Inc: $10,108 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTURNING POINT CENTER OF ADDISON COUNTY: $7,770 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTurning Point Center of Bennington Inc: $6,883 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNORTH CENTRAL VERMONT RECOVERY CENTER INC: $1,807 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetKINGDOM RECOVERY CENTER INC: $1,807 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetJOURNEY TO RECOVERY COMMUNITY: $1,807 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Vermont Community…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Vermont Community FoundationVT23.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Vermont Community Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Vermont Recovery Network Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Vermont Recovery Network Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 71%
  • Turning Point Center of Central Vermont Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Journey to Recovery Community: 81% of income from government
  • Turning Point of Franklin County I: 71% of income from government
  • North Central Vermont Recovery Center Inc: 69% of income from government
  • Turning Point Center of Addison County: 62% of income from government
  • Turning Point Recovery Center of Springfield Vt Inc: 24% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
5rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Vermont Recovery Network’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home