Skip to content
Veery Foundation Inc Mng Agy at a glance

· Private foundation

Veery Foundation Inc Mng Agy

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $110k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $1.2M
$100,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INFACT$200,000
ABORTION CARE NETWORK$150,000
PROMISE OF JUSTICE INITIATIVE$130,000
FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MA$100,000
SURJ$100,000
TRANSHEALTH$100,000
SURVIVAL CENTERS INC$100,000
AUDUBON SOCIETY OF RI$100,000
NONVIOLENCE INTERNATIONAL$80,000
Individual grant recipient$75,000
THOUSAND CURRENTS$50,000
FRIENDS OF CHILDREN$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
COMMUNITY INVOLVED IN SUSTAINING AG$25,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 80% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%TRANSHEALTH: $100k → 12%COMMUNITY INVOLVED IN SUSTAINING AG: $25k → 14%INFACT: $200k → 16%FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MA: $100k → 17%THOUSAND CURRENTS: $50k → 10%SURJ: $100k → 13%ABORTION CARE NETWORK: $150k → 14%AUDUBON SOCIETY OF RI: $100k → 14%PROMISE OF JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $130k → 23%CULTIVATING COMMUNITY: $10k → 7%FRIENDS OF CHILDREN: $25k → 12%AMHERST FAM OUTREACH: $75k → 17%NONVIOLENCE INTERNATIONAL: $80k → 14%NORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CT: $25k → 12%NOT BREAD ALONE: $25k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food & Water Watch

Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…

Food & Nutrition
2
Transformca dba Transform

Transform works to ensure that people of all incomes thrive in a world safe from climate chaos.

Community Improvement
3
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
4
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
5
New Roots Institute

New Roots Institute is a nonprofit empowering the next generation with knowledge and training to end factory farming.

Food & Nutrition
6
Sustainable Harvest International

Working together to create a just and sustainable world through transformative farmer training that nourishes communities and the Earth.

Environment
7
Gardens for Health International

Gardens for Health International works to provide lasting agricultural solutions to chronic childhood malnutrition

International
8
The Alliance for Collective Action

The Alliance for Collective Action convenes leaders of environmental and social movements to advance solutions for a thriving planet. We advance our mission through the Alliance Center building and community, as well as through Collective…

Environment
9
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
10
Foodshot Global Inc

Accelerate the transformation to a healthy, sustainable and equitable food system.

Food & Nutrition
11
Fair Count Inc

Fair count builds long-term power within historically undercounted communities. with the census as our north star, we use every iteration of civic participation as a catalyst to build a more equitable democracy.

Community Improvement
12
Wedontwaste Inc

We Dont Waste increases food access and protects the planet by rescuing and repurposing food, while educating and advocating to increase food security and decrease food waste.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Survival Centers Inc; the most unlike its peers is Non-Violence International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SURJ: $100,000 · OtherSURJAUDUBON SOCIETY OF RI: $100,000 · OtherAUDUBON SOCIETY OF RITHE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC: $100,000 · OtherTHE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INCNON-VIOLENCE INTERNATIONAL: $80,000 · OtherNON-VIOLENCE INTERNATIONALIndividual grant recipient: $75,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY INVOLVED IN SUSTAINING AG: $25,000 · OtherABORTION CARE NETWORK: $150,000 · HealthABORTION CARE NETWORKTRANSHEALTH INC: $100,000 · HealthTRANSHEALTH INCInfact DBA Corporate Accountability: $200,000 · EnvironmentInfact DBA Corpor…THE PROMISE OF JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $130,000 · Crime & LegalTHE PROMISE…SURVIVAL CENTERS INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesTHOUSAND CURRENTS: $50,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF CHILDREN INC: $25,000 · Civil RightsCULTIVATING COMMUNITY: $10,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$530,000Health$250,000Environment$200,000Crime & Legal$130,000Human Services$100,000International$50,000Civil Rights$25,000Food & Nutrition$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetInfact DBA Corporate Accountability: $200,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetTHE PROMISE OF JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $130,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetSURVIVAL CENTERS INC: $100,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetTHE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHOUSAND CURRENTS: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF CHILDREN INC: $25,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Veery Foundation Inc Mng Agy’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home