Skip to content

· Private foundation

Vaterstetten Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$14k
Granted FY2019
7
Grants FY2019
3
States reached
$3k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Vaterstetten Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Santa Fe Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year Vaterstetten Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $14k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

5
’19
4
’20
3
’21
4
’22
6
’23
1
’24
0
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Philanthropy$62kHealth$7kEducation$6kCommunity Improvement$6kArts & Culture$4kInternational$3kHuman Services$3k
02FY2019 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,300
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Rotary Club of Oak Park River Forest$3,375
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Rotary Club of Santa Fe Foundation$2,685
Scott's House$2,300
WTTW$1,000
Rotary Club of Santa Fe Centro$1,000
Rotary Club of Houston Foundation$552
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Sarah's Inn IL: $1k → 14%Sarah's Inn IL: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$18k · 6 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against -2% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2019, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call). Read against FY2019, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
6

Total granted

$18k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
-2%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SCOTT'S HOUSE INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $7k · revenue +325%
  • WT
    WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $3k · revenue +19%
  • SI
    SARAH'S INN
    2× · 2020–2021 · $2k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • RC
    ROTARY CLUB - OAK PARKRIVER FOREST
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue -2%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • OP
    Oak Park-River Forest Community Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rotary International Club Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
2
Salinas Rotary Club

Supporting other rotary charities in order to support and foster local, regional, national and international peace and understanding.

—
3
Rotary Club of Tucson Foundation

The purpose of the foundation is to support the local and international communities through donations to educational, community and international charities.

Community Improvement
4
South San Francisco Rotary Foundation
—
5
Rotary Club of Fresno Foundation

The Foundation was established to raise funds for the purpose of contributing to charitable and educational organizations in the local, national, and international community.

Community Improvement
6
Tucson Scottish Rite Charitable Foundation
—
7
Rotary International Taos Milagro

Taos Milagro Rotary Club provides college scholarships for local high school students, delivers literacy programs for local elementary school students, provides grants to local community organizations, and provides local support for…

—
8
Rio Rancho Community Foundation Inc

he Rio Rancho Community Foundation is a primary source for philanthropy within Sandoval County. We connect people non-profits and resources to benefit all within the Region. We work with non-profits and philanthropists to raise money so…

Philanthropy
9
Rancho Santa Fe Rotary Foundation Inc

The organization's primary exempt purposes are educational and charitable

—
10
Rotary Club of Santa Barbara Sunrise Charitable Foundation

Support local and international charities

Philanthropy
11
Rotary Club of San Jose Inc

Engage San Jose Leaders in meaningful service within our community and humanitarian projects around the world, while embracing opportunities for fellowship and enjoying extraordinary speakers.

—
12
Santa Rosa Sunrise Rotary Foundation

To provide programs, services and scholarships to the local, regional andinternational communities for those in need. also to promote honesty,integrity and community service among its members.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rotary Club of Santa Fe; the most unlike its peers is Shelterbox Usa Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $60,738 · PhilanthropySANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONROTARY CLUB - OAK PARKRIVER FOREST: $3,375 · OtherROTARY CLUB …Individual grant recipient: $3,000 · OtherIndividual g…Oak Park-River Forest Community Foundation: $1,500 · OtherOak Park-Riv…Rotary Club of Santa Fe Centro: $1,000 · OtherRotary Club …SANTA FE PRO MUSICA ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION: $1,000 · OtherSANTA FE PRO…+1 more: $200 · OtherSCOTT'S HOUSE INC: $6,600 · HealthRotary Club of Santa Fe Foundation Inc: $5,855 · EducationSARAH'S INN: $2,000 · Human ServicesSHELTERBOX USA INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $2,500 · Arts & CultureThe Rotary Club of Houston Foundation Inc: $1,257 · Community Improvement
Philanthropy$60,738Other$10,075Health$6,600Education$5,855Human Services$3,000Arts & Culture$2,500Community Improvement$1,257

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $60,738 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSCOTT'S HOUSE INC: $6,600 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetRotary Club of Santa Fe Foundation Inc: $5,855 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetROTARY CLUB - OAK PARKRIVER FOREST: $3,375 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSARAH'S INN: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Rotary Club of Houston Foundation Inc: $1,257 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSHELTERBOX USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA FE PRO MUSICA ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetRotary Club of Santa Fe: $200 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Vaterstetten Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Vaterstetten Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Vaterstetten Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Vaterstetten Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Vaterstetten’s filings →

    More from the funding graph