· Private foundation
Vaterstetten Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Read this first · the figures below need context
96% of Vaterstetten Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Santa Fe Community Foundation, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year Vaterstetten Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $14k. It is dated, not current.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Rotary Club of Oak Park River Forest | $3,375 |
| Rotary International | $3,000 |
| Rotary Club of Santa Fe Foundation | $2,685 |
| Scott's House | $2,300 |
| Rotary Club of Santa Fe Centro | $1,000 |
| WTTW | $1,000 |
| Rotary Club of Houston Foundation | $552 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against -2% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2019, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call). Read against FY2019, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SHSCOTT'S HOUSE INC5× · 2019–2024 · $7k · revenue +325%
- WTWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC3× · 2019–2021 · $3k · revenue +19%
- SISARAH'S INN2× · 2020–2021 · $2k · revenue +17%
Funded once
- RCROTARY CLUB - OAK PARKRIVER FORESTone grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue -2%
- RIRotary Internationalone grant, 2019 · $3k
- OPOak Park-River Forest Community Foundationone grant, 2021 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Supporting other rotary charities in order to support and foster local, regional, national and international peace and understanding.
The purpose of the foundation is to support the local and international communities through donations to educational, community and international charities.
Taos Milagro Rotary Club provides college scholarships for local high school students, delivers literacy programs for local elementary school students, provides grants to local community organizations, and provides local support for…
he Rio Rancho Community Foundation is a primary source for philanthropy within Sandoval County. We connect people non-profits and resources to benefit all within the Region. We work with non-profits and philanthropists to raise money so…
The Foundation was established to raise funds for the purpose of contributing to charitable and educational organizations in the local, national, and international community.
Support local and international charities
The organization's primary exempt purposes are educational and charitable
To provide programs, services and scholarships to the local, regional andinternational communities for those in need. also to promote honesty,integrity and community service among its members.
Engage San Jose Leaders in meaningful service within our community and humanitarian projects around the world, while embracing opportunities for fellowship and enjoying extraordinary speakers.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rotary Club of Santa Fe and the most unlike its peers is Shelterbox Usa Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SCOTT'S HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Rotary Club of Santa Fe Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds ROTARY CLUB - OAK PARKRIVER FOREST ↗
- Who funds WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds SARAH'S INN ↗
- Who funds The Rotary Club of Houston Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds SANTA FE PRO MUSICA ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SHELTERBOX USA INC ↗
- Who funds Rotary Club of Santa Fe ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Vaterstetten Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Vaterstetten Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Vaterstetten Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.