Skip to content

· Private foundation

Van Itallie Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$68k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$201kArts & Culture$169kPublic Benefit$42kReligion$38kAnimals$30kEducation$23kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kCommunity Improvement$2k
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$698k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WBGO NEWARK PUBLIC RADIO$5,500
AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION$5,000
NATURAL RESOURCE DEFENSE COUNCIL$5,000
LA MAMA ETC$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
FRANKLIN LAND TRUST$4,500
DEMOCRACY NOW1$4,000
WAMC - NORTHEAST PUBLIC R$4,000
SHANTIGAR FOUNDATION$4,000
RIVERKEEPER$3,500
Individual grant recipient$3,500
SOUSA MENDES FOUNDATION INC$3,000
ALFORD LAND TRUST$3,000
WNYC RADIO NEW YORK$3,000
HAMPSHIRE COLLEGE$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BERKSHIRE NATURAL RESOURC: $5k → 12%CITIZEN'S AWARENESS NETWK: $6k → 14%WAMC - NORTHEAST PUBLIC R: $4k → 14%NATURAL RESOURCE DEFENSE COUNCIL: $5k → 17%AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%WBGO NEWARK PUBLIC RADIO: $6k → 16%BERKSHIRE NATURAL RESOURC: $5k → 12%SHANTIGAR FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%WAMC - NORTHEAST PUBLIC R: $4k → 14%NATURAL RESOURCE DEFENSE COUNCIL: $5k → 17%AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%WBGO NEWARK PUBLIC RADIO: $6k → 16%BERKSHIRE NATURAL RESOURC: $5k → 12%SHANTIGAR FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%NATURAL RESOURCE DEFENSE COUNCIL: $5k → 17%AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%WBGO NEWARK PUBLIC RADIO: $6k → 16%BERKSHIRE NATURAL RESOURC: $5k → 12%SHANTIGAR FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%WBGO NEWARK PUBLIC RADIO: $6k → 16%BERKSHIRE NATURAL RESOURC: $5k → 12%CITIZEN'S AWARENESS NETWK: $5k → 14%WBGO NEWARK PUBLIC RADIO: $6k → 16%CITIZEN'S AWARENESS NETWK: $5k → 14%WBGO NEWARK PUBLIC RADIO: $6k → 16%CITIZEN'S AWARENESS NETWK: $5k → 14%WBGO NEWARK PUBLIC RADIO: $5k → 16%SHANTIGAR FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%WBGO NEWARK PUBLIC RADIO: $5k → 16%ALFORD LAND TRUST: $6k → 12%LA MAMA ETC: $6k → 17%LA MAMA ETC: $6k → 17%LA MAMA ETC: $6k → 17%LA MAMA ETC: $6k → 17%LA MAMA ETC: $5k → 17%LA MAMA ETC: $5k → 17%LA MAMA ETC: $5k → 17%LA MAMA ETC: $5k → 17%FRANKLIN LAND TRUST: $5k → 14%FRANKLIN LAND TRUST: $5k → 14%FRANKLIN LAND TRUST: $5k → 14%FRANKLIN LAND TRUST: $5k → 14%FRANKLIN LAND TRUST: $5k → 14%DEMOCRACY NOW: $8k → 17%DEMOCRACY NOW: $8k → 17%DEMOCRACY NOW: $8k → 17%DEMOCRACY NOW: $7k → 17%DEMOCRACY NOW: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$500k · 20 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
3

Total granted

$500k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+21%

Still filing today

45%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentArts & CultureAnimalsEducationCommunity ImprovementInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    Shantigar Foundation Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $38k · revenue +18%
  • NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $31k · revenue +41%
  • AW
    AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $30k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +21%
  • HISPANIC FEDERATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +187%
  • DA
    DOWNTOWN ART CO
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue -71%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
Environment Now
—
3
Conservation Law Foundation Inc

Conservation law foundation, inc. (clf) protects new england's environment for the benefit of all people and future generations. we use the law, science, and markets to create solutions that preserve and restore our natural resources,…

Environment
4
New Jersey Conservation Foundation

Recognizing that a healthy environment is critical to the well-being and survival of all living things, new jersey conservation foundation is devoted to preserving land and protecting natural resources throughout new jersey's (continued on…

Environment
5
Wilderness Conservation Foundation
Environment
6
Wild Landscapes Inc

Wild landscapes, inc. (wli) is dedicated to conserving large and connected landscapes globally significant to wildlife and crucial to local communities. our environmental conservation strategy is to empower communities, conservationists,…

Animals
7
The Quebec-Labrador Foundation Inc

The program mission of the quebec-labrador foundation u.s. is defined by a regional component (new england and eastern canada), and an international component, which ties our regional model to a global conservation network. qlf's program…

Philanthropy
8
Washington Forest Law Center

Dedicated to protecting the world's natural environment on behalf of the public by serving as a public interest law firm. refer to schedule o, part iii, line 4a, for list of litigated cases or advocacy work.

—
9
National Wildlife Federation

Unite all americans to ensure wildlife thrives in a rapidly changing world.

Animals
10
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
11
Ady Gil World Conservation
Animals
12
Adirondack Land Trust Inc

To forever conserve the forests, farmlands, waters and wild places that advance the quality of life of our communities and the ecological integrity of the adirondacks.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wamc; the most unlike its peers is Shantigar Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LA MAMA ETC: $44,000 · OtherLA MAMA ETCWBGO NEWARK PUBLIC RADIO: $42,500 · OtherWBGO NEWARK PUBLIC RADIOShantigar Foundation Inc: $38,000 · OtherShantigar Foundation IncIndividual grant recipient: $36,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $32,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $22,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWNYC RADIO NEW YORK: $18,500 · OtherWNYC RADIO NEW YORKSOUSA MENDES FOUNDATION INC: $18,250 · OtherSOUSA MENDES FOUNDATION INCGVSHP: $12,250 · OtherTHEATER FOR NEW CITY: $10,000 · Other+3 more: $16,500 · Other+3 moreNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $31,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFE…FRANKLIN LAND TRUST INC: $27,000 · EnvironmentFRANKLIN LAND TRUST IN…RIVERKEEPER INC: $22,500 · EnvironmentRIVERKEEPER INCAlford Land Trust Inc: $22,000 · EnvironmentAlford Land Trust IncDEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS INC: $34,000 · Arts & CultureDEMOCRACY NOW…WAMC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureWAMCAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $29,500 · AnimalsHAMPSHIRE COLLEGE TRUSTEES: $19,500 · EducationWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,500 · InternationalHISPANIC FEDERATION INC: $2,000 · Community Improvement
Other$291,250Environment$102,500Arts & Culture$59,000Animals$29,500Education$19,500International$2,500Community Improvement$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetShantigar Foundation Inc: $38,000 over 8y, 18% of budgetDEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS INC: $34,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $31,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $29,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFRANKLIN LAND TRUST INC: $27,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetWAMC: $25,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetRIVERKEEPER INC: $22,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAlford Land Trust Inc: $22,000 over 8y, 11% of budgetHAMPSHIRE COLLEGE TRUSTEES: $19,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHISPANIC FEDERATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOWNTOWN ART CO: $1,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Shantigar Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds DEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FRANKLIN LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds WAMC ↗
  • Who funds RIVERKEEPER INC ↗
  • Who funds Alford Land Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds HAMPSHIRE COLLEGE TRUSTEES ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds HISPANIC FEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN ART CO ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Van Itallie Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Van Itallie Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Franklin Land Trust Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Van Itallie Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Van Itallie Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Van Itallie’s filings →

More from the funding graph