Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Vail Clinic Inc % Vhh Accounting Department

Elevating health across our mountain communities.

$19M
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$5.6M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$113MEducation$1.3MPhilanthropy$924kHuman Services$492kRecreation & Sports$350kCommunity Improvement$158kOther$1.8M
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $173k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $489k
  • $250k+4 grants · $18M
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$853M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VVMC DIVERSIFIED SERVICES$5,600,000
VAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION$4,491,560
STEADMAN PHILIPPON RESEARCH FOUNDATION$4,310,000
EAGLE VALLEY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH$3,856,540
EAGLE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$97,412
YOUTHPOWER365$90,000
MY FUTURE PATHWAYS INC$85,850
BRIGHT FUTURE FOUNDATION$60,000
EAGLE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT$55,000
THE SUMMIT FOUNDATION$51,000
VAIL RELIGIOUS FOUNDATION$50,000
UNITED STATES SKI TEAM$40,000
VAIL CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL$35,000
HOPE CENTER OF THE EAGLE RIVER VALLEY$25,300
EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF EAGLE COUNTY$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $476k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION: $5k → 7%FAMILY & INTERCULTURAL RESOURCE CENTER: $300k → 9%FAMILY & INTERCULTURAL RESOURCE CENTER: $15k → 9%FAMILY & INTERCULTURAL RESOURCE CENTER: $15k → 9%FAMILY & INTERCULTURAL RESOURCE CENTER: $15k → 9%MY FUTURE PATHWAYS INC: $86k → 7%VAIL VALLEY CHARITABLE FUND: $20k → 7%VAIL VALLEY CHARITABLE FUND: $20k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$117M · 26 repeat orgs$683k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
8

Total granted

$117M
$506k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+73%

Still filing today

81%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $177k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsEducationPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    STEADMAN PHILIPPON RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    7× · 2017–2024 · $30M · revenue +39% · 42% of their budget
  • EV
    EAGLE VALLEY MENTAL HEALTH
    6× · 2019–2024 · $23M · revenue ×113 · 100% of their budget
  • MF
    MOUNTAIN FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS
    4× · 2017–2020 · $1.4M · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • MH
    MOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE COALITION
    one grant, 2023 · $463k
  • WM
    WALKING MOUNTAINS SCIENCE CTR
    one grant, 2022 · $12k
  • EV
    EAGLE VALLEY CHILD CARE ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $6k · revenue +73%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Vail International Pro Am
Recreation & Sports
2
Vail Clinic Inc % Vhh Accounting Department

Elevating health across our mountain communities.

Health
3
Vail Health Services

Vail health services is the parent company of a group of companies generally known as vail health, whose mission is to elevate health across our mountain communities.

Health
4
Eagle River Valley Childcare

Eagle river valley childcare is strategically designed to address the childcare supply and affordability issues in the eagle county, colorado community.

Human Services
5
The Colorado Health Foundation
Health
6
Epicpromise Employee Foundation

The EpicPromise Foundation supports Vail Resorts employees and their dependents in times of need through emergency financial assistance and educational grants.

Philanthropy
7
Vail Mountain School

We inspire tomorrow's ethical leaders by developing character, seeking knowledge, and building a community of lifelong learners from the heart of the colorado mountains to the world beyond.

Education
8
Summit Health Foundation
Health
9
Rocky Mountain Health Foundation
Health
10
Boulder County Injured and Fallen Officer Foundation
Public Safety & Disaster
11
Colorado Health Institute
Health
12
Sierra Health Foundation
Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vail Health Services Foundation and the most unlike its peers is International Congress for Joint Reconstruction. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%0%<5yr16%4%5–10yr23%23%10–20yr20%27%20–35yr10%35%35–55yr9%12%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr23%4%10–20yr20%3%20–35yr10%92%35–55yr9%1%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/39
the rest of the field
11%
90/806

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/33
Grantees still filing
21/33
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VVMC DIVERSIFIED SERVICES — $46,200,000 · HealthVVMC DIVERSIFIED SERVICESSTEADMAN PHILIPPON RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $30,334,977 · HealthSTEADMAN PHILIPPON RESEARCH INSTITUTEEAGLE VALLEY MENTAL HEALTH — $22,892,864 · HealthEAGLE VALLEY MENTAL HEALTHVAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION — $12,443,696 · HealthVAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION+3 more — $1,600,455 · HealthMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE COALITION — $463,343 · OtherColorado Mountain Medical — $313,100 · OtherBRIGHT FUTURE FOUNDATION FOR EAGLE COUNTY — $310,000 · OtherEAGLE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT — $150,000 · OtherEAGLE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT — $135,000 · OtherVAIL VALLEY PARTNERSHIP — $83,800 · OtherCOLORADO MOUNTAIN COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $69,400 · Other+10 more — $242,362 · OtherVAIL-SUMMIT RESEARCH & EDUCATION FOUNDAT — $1,050,000 · EducationEDUCATION FOUNDATION OF EAGLE CNTY — $155,000 · EducationWALKING MOUNTAINS — $47,500 · EducationYOUTHPOWER365 — $390,000 · PhilanthropyEAGLE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $354,324 · PhilanthropyTHE SUMMIT FOUNDATION — $174,500 · Philanthropy+1 more — $5,000 · PhilanthropySUMMIT COUNTY RESOURCE CENTER DBA FAMILY & INTERCULTURAL RESOURCE CENTER — $345,000 · Human ServicesMY FUTURE PATHWAYS INC — $85,850 · Human ServicesVail Valley Charitable Fund Inc — $40,000 · Human Services+3 more — $20,910 · Human ServicesUnited States Ski Team Foundation — $320,000 · Recreation & SportsROUNDUP RIVER RANCH — $25,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more — $5,000 · Recreation & SportsVAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION — $158,000 · Community Improvement
Health$113,471,992Other$1,767,005Education$1,252,500Philanthropy$923,824Human Services$491,760Recreation & Sports$350,000Community Improvement$158,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVVMC DIVERSIFIED SERVICES — $46,200,000 over 8y, 67% of budgetSTEADMAN PHILIPPON RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $30,334,977 over 7y, 42% of budgetEAGLE VALLEY MENTAL HEALTH — $22,892,864 over 6y, 100% of budgetVAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION — $12,443,696 over 3y, 31% of budgetMOUNTAIN FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS — $1,442,840 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetVAIL-SUMMIT RESEARCH & EDUCATION FOUNDAT — $1,050,000 over 3y, 69% of budgetYOUTHPOWER365 — $390,000 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetEAGLE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $354,324 over 6y, 8.2% of budgetSUMMIT COUNTY RESOURCE CENTER DBA FAMILY & INTERCULTURAL RESOURCE CENTER — $345,000 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetUnited States Ski Team Foundation — $320,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetBRIGHT FUTURE FOUNDATION FOR EAGLE COUNTY — $310,000 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetTHE SUMMIT FOUNDATION — $174,500 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetVAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION — $158,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetEDUCATION FOUNDATION OF EAGLE CNTY — $155,000 over 7y, 17% of budgetStarting Hearts — $152,615 over 4y, 13% of budgetMY FUTURE PATHWAYS INC — $85,850 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetVAIL VALLEY PARTNERSHIP — $83,800 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetCOLORADO MOUNTAIN COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $69,400 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetBEHAVIORAL HEALTH CRISIS SERVICES — $50,612 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetVAIL RELIGIOUS FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetWALKING MOUNTAINS — $47,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetVail Valley Charitable Fund Inc — $40,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetROUNDUP RIVER RANCH — $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetVail Breast Cancer Awareness Group — $24,000 over 3y, 27% of budgetDENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetVail Junior Hockey Association — $17,500 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetSONNENALP OF VAIL FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetEAGLE VALLEY CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION — $5,910 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetThe Cycle Effect — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetERIK WEIHENMAYER REACH FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetInternational Congress for Joint Reconstruction — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives Founda…Rocky Mountain Health…Eagle Valley Mental H…Vail Valley FoundationVail Valley CaresThe Colorado Health F…United Way of Eagle R…Kelton Family Foundat…El Pomar FoundationThe Denver FoundationSlifer Family Foundat…Slifer Smith & Frampt…
Colorado Gives FoundationCO28.1× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Rocky Mountain Health Foundation · Eagle Valley Mental Health · Vail Valley Foundation · Vail Valley Cares · The Colorado Health Foundation · United Way of Eagle River Valley · Kelton Family Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Slifer Family Foundation · Slifer Smith & Frampton Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Vail Clinic Inc % Vhh Accounting Department funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines