Skip to content
Vahavta Lereacha Kamocha Ltd at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Vahavta Lereacha Kamocha Ltd

To benefit individuals in the jewish community by collecting and distributing food and other necessary items; to secure and provide volunteers to offer aid and assistance to the poor, homeless and the needy through the collection and dissemination of food, clothing and other items; to encourage interest, awareness and activism in local…

$155k
Granted FY2020
11
Grants FY2020
3
States reached
$54k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Religion$1.2MHuman Services$330kInternational$145kEducation$110kPhilanthropy$55k
02FY2020 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k2 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $98k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $54k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VARIOUS INDIVIDUAL GRANT RECIPIENTS$54,430
Individual grant recipient$18,000
Individual grant recipient$16,260
LIKRAS SHABBOS INC$12,500
VARIOUS CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS$10,750
BNOS ESTHER MALKAH INC$10,000
YESHIVA GEDOLA OF PASSAIC$10,000
SHULAMITH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS OF BROOKLYN$10,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER INC$10,000
CHICAGO COMMUNITY KOLLEL$2,000
YISHIVAS ABIREY LEV$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AFO YAD ELIEZER: $25k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER INC: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

38%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$684k · 8 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +74% since the first grant, against -20% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2020, 7 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
16

Total granted

$684k
$982k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
-20%

Still filing today

38%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 6% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $145k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
EducationReligionInternationalPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER
    2× · 2017–2020 · $35k · revenue +7%
  • YI
    YESHIVA IMREI BINA INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $21k · revenue +74%
  • KE
    KEREN ESTHER FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $19k · revenue +296%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF RABBINICAL COLLEGE NETIV HADAAT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $200k · revenue +78%
  • CZ
    CONGREGATION ZICHRON MOSHE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $110k
  • CA
    CONGREGATION AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED INC
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Kollel Nefesh Hachaim Inc
Education
4
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
5
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
6
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
7
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
8
Yeshiva Birkat Israel Inc

Education services

Religion
9
Yeshiva Keren Hatorah of Passaic- Clifton

To operate a high school offering religious instruction and general studies as well as a post high school program of talmudic studies. the school shall be run under the standards of orthodox jewish law and tradition.

Education
10
Ziv Israel Association
—
11
Bais Yehuda Perach Rochel Foundation
Public Benefit
12
Ohr Yisrael Yeshiva Inc

Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Rabbinical College Netiv Hadaat Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ztm Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KEREN NER MATISYAHU INC: $275,700 · OtherKEREN NER MATISYAHU INCCONG BAIS MEDRASH TEHILLAS SHLOMO: $160,000 · OtherCONG BAIS MEDRASH TEHILLAS SHLOMOCONGREGATION ZICHRON MOSHE INC: $110,000 · OtherCONGREGATION ZICHRON MOSHE INCCONGREGATION AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED INC: $100,000 · OtherCONGREGATION AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED INCCONGREGATION BEIS MEDRASH AVREICHIM INC: $100,000 · OtherCONGREGATION BEIS MEDRASH AVREICHIM INCCONGREGATION BAIS HACHINUCH INC: $80,000 · OtherCONGREGATION BAIS HACHINUCH INCCONGREGATION ANSHI FALLSBURG: $57,920 · OtherVARIOUS INDIVIDUAL GRANT RECIPIENTS: $54,430 · OtherCONGREGATION SHAAR HASHAMAYIM: $50,000 · Other+10 more: $134,510 · Other+10 moreAMERICAN FRIENDS OF RABBINICAL COLLEGE NETIV HADAAT INC: $200,000 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF R…Mesivta Ahavas Hatorah: $100,000 · EducationMesivta Ahavas Hatora…KEREN ESTHER FOUNDATION: $19,000 · EducationKEREN ESTHER FOUNDATI…+3 more: $30,000 · Education+3 moreAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAS BIRCAS HATORAH INC: $55,000 · ReligionAMERICAN …YESHIVAS NER DOVID INC: $50,000 · ReligionYESHIVAS …YESHIVA IMREI BINA INC: $20,800 · ReligionYESHIVA I…Likras Shabbos Inc: $12,500 · ReligionLikras Sh…AAK INTERNATIONAL RELIEF INC: $10,000 · ReligionAAK INTER…+1 more: $1,000 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ZICHRON YOSEF R: $100,000 · InternationalZTM FOUNDATION: $55,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $35,000 · Human Services
Other$1,122,560Education$349,000Religion$149,300International$100,000Philanthropy$55,000Human Services$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF RABBINICAL COLLEGE NETIV HADAAT INC: $200,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ZICHRON YOSEF R: $100,000 over 1y, 41% of budgetMesivta Ahavas Hatorah: $100,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetZTM FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 1y, 47% of budgetYESHIVAS NER DOVID INC: $50,000 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA IMREI BINA INC: $20,800 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetKEREN ESTHER FOUNDATION: $19,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetLikras Shabbos Inc: $12,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBNOS ESTHER MALKA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTALMUDIC RESEARCH CENTER OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSHULAMITH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS OF BROOKLYN: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAAK INTERNATIONAL RELIEF INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetYESHIVAS ABIREY LEV: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KEREN NER MATISYAHU INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF RABBINICAL COLLEGE NETIV HADAAT INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ZICHRON YOSEF R ↗
  • Who funds Mesivta Ahavas Hatorah ↗
  • Who funds ZTM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAS BIRCAS HATORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAS NER DOVID INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA IMREI BINA INC ↗
  • Who funds KEREN ESTHER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Likras Shabbos Inc ↗
  • Who funds BNOS ESTHER MALKA INC ↗
  • Who funds TALMUDIC RESEARCH CENTER OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY ↗
  • Who funds SHULAMITH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS OF BROOKLYN ↗
  • Who funds AAK INTERNATIONAL RELIEF INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAS ABIREY LEV ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundThe Ojc FundGrant Recommendation …Toras Chesed IncDonors Fund IncJack Adjmi Family Fou…Jewish Community Foun…Fund for Life Foundat…Gs Donor Advised Phil…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Fidelity Investments …
Jewish Communal FundNY29.6× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Ojc Fund · Grant Recommendation Fund · Toras Chesed Inc · Donors Fund Inc · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Fund for Life Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Vahavta Lereacha Kamocha Ltd funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Vahavta Lereacha Kamocha Ltd. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Bnos Esther Malka Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Vahavta Lereacha Kamocha Ltd?

Find your warmest path to Vahavta Lereacha Kamocha Ltd through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2021) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Vahavta Lereacha Kamocha Ltd’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home