Skip to content

· Private foundation

V & L London Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$119k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What it funds
0170% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$96kHuman Services$85kInternational$73kReligion$70kHealth$55kPublic Benefit$46kHousing & Shelter$6kArts & Culture$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $92k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$541k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOVE 2024$35,500
OTHER UNDER 5000$13,614
Individual grant recipient$12,500
MIRMAN SCHOOL$10,000
CALTHORP SCHOOL$10,000
ANDREW ENNABE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$10,000
EMINAS HAND FOUNDATION$9,000
CHILDERENS HOSPITAL$7,000
OPERATION SMILE$5,000
FAHTER FLANAGAN BOYS TOWN$5,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $93k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BOYS TOWN: $10k → 12%BOYS TOWN: $5k → 12%BOYS TOWN: $5k → 12%ANDREW ENNABE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $12k → 14%ANDREW ENNABE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $11k → 14%ANDREW ENNABE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%ANDREW ENNABE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%ANDREW ENNABE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%ANDREW ENNABE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%ANDREW ENNABE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%ANDREW ENNABE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
CA
NE
VA
SC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$631k · 12 repeat orgs$118k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
5

Total granted

$631k
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
0%

Still filing today

50%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $68k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyHealthReligionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AE
    ANDREW ENNABE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $73k · revenue +88%
  • CS
    CARLTHORP SCHOOL
    4× · 2021–2024 · $45k · revenue +92%
  • IT
    IN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC
    5× · 2018–2023 · $40k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • VC
    VINTAGE CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • C
    CASA
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • LA
    LOS ANGELES MISSION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Flintridge Preparatory School

Learning with purpose in a diverse and nurturing community, flintridge prep students thrive in adolescence and grow as curious scholars, creative thinkers , empathetic leaders, and global citizens.

Education
2
Crestmont School

At crestmont school we cultivate a creative learning environment where students become critical thinkers, skillful collaborators, and courageous changemaking citizens.

—
3
The Mount Sinai Hospital

Mount sinai is committed to the advancement of the art and science of medicine through clinical excellence. the central mission consists of high-quality patient care and teaching conducted in an atmosphere of social concern and scholarly…

Health
4
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
5
Miracles From Heaven
International
6
International School of Los Angeles Lycee International De Los Angeles

The international school of los angeles is a non-profit, independent, international school committed to bilingual education and academic excellence in a nurturing environment.our mission is to develop bilingual critical thinkers who are…

Education
7
Isidore Newman School

Newman inspires individual growth and academic excellence within an inclusive community committed to strong relationships and high expectations.

Education
8
Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary

THE MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY ("THE INFIRMARY") IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT TEACHING HOSPITAL CONDUCTING PATIENT CARE AND RESEARCH. THE INFIRMARY IS A TEACHING HOSPITAL OF HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL AND AN INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH.…

Health
9
Iamangel Foundation
Philanthropy
10
The Meg Foundation

Empower families with the skills, strategies, and support they need to manage pain and medical anxiety. We give people not just information, but a path to self-advocacy and action.

Health
11
Children's Miracle Network

Children's miracle network (dba "children's miracle network hospitals") works to save kids' lives by bringing people together to raise money for children's healthcare in local communities.

Unclassified
12
The Chandler School

Chandler's mission is to provide each student with the highest quality and most academically challenging education in a nurturing, balanced and diverse environment. chandler strives to have its students gain a love of learning, a means of…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Los Angeles Mission Inc; the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OTHER UNDER 5000: $131,310 · OtherOTHER UNDER 5000Individual grant recipient: $82,800 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $59,197 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHRYSALIS: $46,000 · OtherCHRYSALISCITY OF HOPE: $45,500 · OtherCITY OF HOPEMOVE 2024: $35,500 · OtherMOVE 2024VINTAGE CHURCH: $25,000 · OtherVINTAGE CHURCH+7 more: $42,000 · Other+7 moreANDREW ENNABE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $72,750 · Human ServicesANDREW ENNABE …Father Flanagan's Boys' Home: $20,000 · Human ServicesFather Flanaga…CARLTHORP SCHOOL: $45,000 · EducationTHE MIRMAN SCHOOL FOR GIFTED CHILDREN: $10,000 · EducationMelissa Kravetz Memorial Foundation: $41,000 · PhilanthropyIN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC: $40,000 · ReligionOPERATION SMILE INC: $27,890 · InternationalIMERMAN ANGELS: $20,000 · HealthLOS ANGELES MISSION INC: $5,250 · Housing & Shelter
Other$467,307Human Services$92,750Education$55,000Philanthropy$41,000Religion$40,000International$27,890Health$20,000Housing & Shelter$5,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANDREW ENNABE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $72,750 over 8y, 7.2% of budgetCARLTHORP SCHOOL: $45,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMelissa Kravetz Memorial Foundation: $41,000 over 4y, 19% of budgetIN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC: $40,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $27,890 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetIMERMAN ANGELS: $20,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MIRMAN SCHOOL FOR GIFTED CHILDREN: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES MISSION INC: $5,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ANDREW ENNABE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CARLTHORP SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Melissa Kravetz Memorial Foundation ↗
  • Who funds IN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
  • Who funds IMERMAN ANGELS ↗
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
  • Who funds THE MIRMAN SCHOOL FOR GIFTED CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES MISSION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization V & L London Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from V & L London Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to V & L London Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to V & L London Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on V & L London Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph