Skip to content

Hawaii · Public charity

Usta Hawaii Pacific Section

To promote the development of tennis as a means of healthful recreation & physical fitness; to maintain and enforce the rules of play established by the United State Tennis Association and the Section. To promote the development of good sportsmanship, fair play, character, and responsible citizenship. To encourage and sanction tennis…

$973k
Granted FY2019
5
Itemized grants FY2019
5
Organizations funded FY2019
20%
First-time grantees FY2019
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2019
$494k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2019
$18,981
Largest grant, FY2019
$389,009
Organizations funded a year
4 to 5
FY2017 to FY2019
States reached, FY2019
1

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2019, 20% of the organizations Usta Hawaii Pacific Section funded were first-time grantees, receiving 79% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $389k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19
Recreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20195$494k20%
FY20185$238k20%
FY20174$134kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Recreation & Sports$765kCrime & Legal$100k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2019, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Usta Hawaii Pacific Inc$389,009132%
Oahu District Tennis Association$237,590384%
Maui District Tennis Association$63,714369%
East Hawaii District Tennis Assoc$47,5913n/a
West Hawaii District Tennis Assoc$27,5943n/a

Plus 1 recipient with no EIN on record ($100k), not named here.

Compare Usta Hawaii Pacific Section with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Usta Hawaii Pacific Section?

Find your warmest path to Usta Hawaii Pacific Section through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Usta Hawaii Pacific Section

How much does Usta Hawaii Pacific Section give?
Usta Hawaii Pacific Section reported 5 itemized grants totaling $493,648, out of $973,316 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2019 IRS filing. It funded between 4 and 5 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2019.
What does Usta Hawaii Pacific Section fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2019, its largest causes are Recreation & Sports (88%), Crime & Legal (12%).
Who are Usta Hawaii Pacific Section's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2019: Usta Hawaii Pacific Inc ($389k), Oahu District Tennis Association ($238k), Maui District Tennis Association ($64k).
Does Usta Hawaii Pacific Section fund new organizations?
In FY2019, 20% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Where is Usta Hawaii Pacific Section based?
Usta Hawaii Pacific Section is based in HI.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Usta Hawaii Pacific Section’s filings →

More from the funding graph