Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Usagainstalzheimer's

USAGAINSTALZHEIMER'S is engaged in a relentless pursuit to end alzheimer's, the sixth leading killer in america.

$206k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$42k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$3.5MArts & Culture$134kHuman Services$45kSocial Science$30kCivil Rights$8kEducation$7kPublic Safety & Disaster$5k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 8 grants below total $156,825 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $205,825 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $49,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$20,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN SOCIETY ON AGING$41,825
THE GERONTOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA$30,000
CARINGKIND$22,500
RESEARCH AMERICA$20,000
ALZHEIMER'S DRUG DISCOVERY FOUNDATION$12,500
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF NEUROLOGY$10,000
ALLIANCE FOR AGING RESEARCH$10,000
BRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $106k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN SOCIETY ON AGING: $42k → 10%AMERICAN SOCIETY ON AGING: $35k → 10%NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR CAREGIVING: $30k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
IA
CA
CO
VA
MD
NC
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

30%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 12 repeat orgs$2.6M to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
18

Total granted

$1.1M
$2.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+32%

Still filing today

92%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPublic BenefitSocial ScienceHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2017–2019 · $275k · revenue +51%
  • Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Inc
    3× · 2017–2019 · $135k · revenue +25%
  • U
    USAGING
    4× · 2017–2020 · $118k · revenue +479%

Funded once

  • DA
    DAVOS ALZHEIMER'S COLLABORATIVE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $2.3M · revenue -14%
  • TF
    THE FORGET ME NOT PROJECT
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue -81% · 37% of their budget
  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +24%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alzheimers Research Association
2
Doheny Eye Institute

To further the conservation, improvement and restoration of human eyesight" (mrs. doheny - 1947).

3
Neurolinx Research Institute

Neuroscience research

Health
4
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
5
Autoimmune Encephalitis Alliance Inc

To support all members of the ae community so no one faces ae alone.

Health
6
Alzheimer's Disease & Related Disorders Association Inc

The alzheimer's association leads the way to end alzheimer's and all other dementia - by accelerating global research, driving risk reduction and early detection, and maximizing quality care and support.

Health
7
The Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration

Promote and fund research into developing better diagnostic processes, therapies, and cures for frontotemporal degeneration (ftd); provide information, education, support and advocacy to persons diagnosed with ftd, their families and…

Health
8
American Neuromuscular Foundation

The american neuromuscular foundation was established to improve the quality of care for people with disorders of skeletal muscle, neuromuscular function, and central and peripheral nervous systems through the promotion of research and…

Health
9
Van Andel Research Institute

Medical research organization van andel research institute is an independent biomedical research organization committed to improving the health and enhancing the lives of current and future generations.

Health
10
Critical Path Institute

The critical path institute is a catalyst in the development of new approaches that advance medical innovation and regulatory science. this is achieved by leading teams that share data, knowledge and expertise resulting in sound, consensus…

Health
11
Access to Advanced Health Institute

Aahi is a nonprofit biotech research institute, bringing together the best experts, technologies, and platforms to create accessible, high-quality products and solutions for harnessing the immune system to alleviate disease.

Health
12
Friedreich's Ataxia Research Alliance

To marshal and focus the resources and relationships needed to cure fa by raising funds for research, promoting public awareness and aligning scientists, patients, clinicians, government agencies and pharmaceutical companies dedicated to…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders New York City Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dementia Alliance International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Health CentersGovernment Accountability R…Veteran Support ServicesSenior Support ServicesCancer Support OrganizationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr18%36%10–20yr18%18%20–35yr16%21%35–55yr15%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%61%5–10yr18%7%10–20yr18%9%20–35yr16%14%35–55yr15%9%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 6% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
6%
2/32
the rest of the field
12%
1,600/12,969

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/27
Grantees still filing
20/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DAVOS ALZHEIMER'S COLLABORATIVE INC — $2,251,108 · HealthDAVOS ALZHEIMER'S COLLABORATIVE INCFoundation for the National Institutes of Health Inc — $135,000 · HealthBRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION — $105,000 · HealthTHE FORGET ME NOT PROJECT — $100,000 · Health+5 more — $68,500 · HealthUSAGING — $117,500 · OtherUSAGINGRESEARCHAMERICA — $110,000 · OtherRESEARCHAMERICAALLIANCE FOR AGING RESEARCH — $84,000 · OtherALLIANCE FOR AGI…GERONTOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA — $80,000 · OtherGERONTOLOGICAL S…TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $50,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOST…GLOBAL COALITION ON AGING LLC — $30,000 · OtherGLOBAL COALITION…VITAL TRANSFORMATION LLC — $25,000 · OtherTHE MILKEN INSTITUTE — $25,000 · Other+5 more — $27,500 · OtherDUKE UNIVERSITY — $275,000 · Education+1 more — $7,000 · EducationALZHEIMER'S DRUG DISCOVERY FOUNDATION — $105,000 · Social ScienceTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $5,000 · Social ScienceAMERICAN SOCIETY ON AGING — $76,325 · Human ServicesNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR CAREGIVING — $30,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF VETERANS' RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATIONS — $33,500 · Arts & CultureCARING FOR MILITARY FAMILIES THE ELIZABETH DOLE FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Public BenefitDEMENTIA ACTION ALLIANCE — $10,000 · Public BenefitAMERICAN ACADEMY OF NEUROLOGY — $10,000 · Community Improvement
Health$2,659,608Other$549,000Education$282,000Social Science$110,000Human Services$106,325Arts & Culture$33,500Public Benefit$20,000Community Improvement$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDAVOS ALZHEIMER'S COLLABORATIVE INC — $2,251,108 over 1y, 16% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $275,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFoundation for the National Institutes of Health Inc — $135,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetUSAGING — $117,500 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetRESEARCHAMERICA — $110,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetBRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION — $105,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DRUG DISCOVERY FOUNDATION — $105,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FORGET ME NOT PROJECT — $100,000 over 1y, 37% of budgetALLIANCE FOR AGING RESEARCH — $84,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetGERONTOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA — $80,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY ON AGING — $76,325 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF VETERANS' RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATIONS — $33,500 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS NEW YORK CITY INC — $32,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR CAREGIVING — $30,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetTHE MILKEN INSTITUTE — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE YOUTH MOVEMENT AGAINST ALZHEIMERS — $10,000 over 2y, 29% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY OF NEUROLOGY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUSAGAINSTALZHEIMER'S — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCARING FOR MILITARY FAMILIES THE ELIZABETH DOLE FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE LATINO ALZHEIMERS AND MEMORY DISORDERS ALLIANCE — $10,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetUNIDOSUS — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDementia Alliance International — $6,000 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIM AND GLEN CAMPBELL FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AARPDC16.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AARP · Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America · Retirement Research Foundation Dba Rrf Foundation for Aging · The John a Hartford Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Usagainstalzheimer's funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Trustees of Boston University12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph