Skip to content

· Public charity

US Ignite Inc

Us ignite, inc.

$10M
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$3.3M
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$26MRecreation & Sports$14MScience & Tech$10MCommunity Improvement$1.6MPublic Benefit$747kArts & Culture$302kHealth$257kYouth Development$93kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $66k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $325k
  • $250k+6 grants · $9.8M
$102,725
Median grant
9
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY$3,292,978
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY$2,729,842
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH$2,155,554
NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY$924,747
RICE UNIVERSITY$453,180
WIRELESS RESEARCH CENTER OF NORTH CAROLINA$292,025
MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY$102,725
THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY$75,720
CITY OF SAN JOSE$75,000
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY (RUTGERS)$72,037
INTERNATIONAL COMPUTER SCIENCE INSTITUTE$44,217
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE$21,613
TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY$6,619
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $217k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RED WING IGNITE: $53k → 9%KC DIGITAL DRIVE: $82k → 15%RED WING IGNITE: $22k → 9%KC DIGITAL DRIVE: $33k → 15%KC DIGITAL DRIVE: $18k → 15%KC DIGITAL DRIVE: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
NE
MO
AZ
TN
NC
SC
DC
LA
MS
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$51M · 36 repeat orgs$2.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +68% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

36 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 25 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
31

Total granted

$51M
$2.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
+19%

Still filing today

36%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $119k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
EducationCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesPublic BenefitArts & CultureScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $3.9M · revenue +110%
  • WM
    William Marsh Rice University
    4× · 2020–2024 · $2.5M · revenue +68%
  • WR
    WIRELESS RESEARCH CENTER OF NORTH CAROLINA
    5× · 2019–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA-LINCOLN
    one grant, 2020 · $299k
  • ALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $234k · revenue -30%
  • KT
    KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES
    one grant, 2022 · $230k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
AI4ALL

Ai4all's mission is to ensure that the next generation of ai leaders reflects humanity. ai4all is transforming the pipeline of ai practitioners who will shape ai for the benefit of humanity.

Youth Development
4
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
5
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
6
University Corporation for Advanced Internet Development

Internet2 promotes the missions of its members by providing both leading-edge network capabilities and unique partnership opportunities that together facilitate the development, deployment and use of revolutionary internet technologies.

Science & Tech
7
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
8
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
9
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
10
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
11
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
12
Webster University

Founded in 1915, webster is a private non-profit and global university that is committed to delivering high-quality learning experiences that transform students for global citizenship and individual excellence.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Enterprise Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lehi Area Chamber of Commerce Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/29
Grantees still filing
21/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $17,443,080 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAHIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY: $6,864,218 · OtherIOWA STATE UNIVERSITYNC STATE UNIVERSITY: $6,288,601 · OtherNC STATE UNIVERSITYRUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY: $5,925,201 · OtherRUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY+45 more: $7,575,565 · Other+45 moreNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $3,895,100 · EducationNORTHEASTERN U…William Marsh Rice University: $2,547,114 · EducationWilliam Marsh …+6 more: $669,098 · Education+6 moreWIRELESS RESEARCH CENTER OF NORTH CAROLINA: $1,274,074 · Science & TechDIGITALC: $284,994 · Community ImprovementTHE ENTERPRISE CENTER INC: $127,700 · Community ImprovementONWARD EUGENE: $105,958 · Community ImprovementLEHI AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC: $83,088 · Community ImprovementBTV IGNITE INC: $54,699 · Community Improvement+1 more: $20,000 · Community ImprovementALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC: $234,077 · Arts & CultureFACTORY TWO INC: $93,218 · Arts & CultureKC DIGITAL DRIVE INC: $142,050 · Human ServicesRED WING IGNITE: $74,966 · Human ServicesUNITED ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE INC: $76,681 · Public BenefitCYBERHIVE: $10,000 · Public BenefitTHE GIVING BACK FUND: $70,631 · Philanthropy
Other$44,096,665Education$7,111,312Science & Tech$1,274,074Community Improvement$676,439Arts & Culture$327,295Human Services$217,016Public Benefit$86,681Philanthropy$70,631

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $3,895,100 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWilliam Marsh Rice University: $2,547,114 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWIRELESS RESEARCH CENTER OF NORTH CAROLINA: $1,274,074 over 5y, 12% of budgetDIGITALC: $284,994 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC: $234,077 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetWESTCHESTER COUNTY ASSOCIATION INC: $226,405 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA AT MONROE FOUNDATION: $184,319 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $156,199 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR DIGITAL PROGRESS: $150,000 over 2y, 73% of budgetKC DIGITAL DRIVE INC: $142,050 over 4y, 24% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $141,978 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIBRARIES WITHOUT BORDERS: $136,460 over 1y, 20% of budgetTHE ENTERPRISE CENTER INC: $127,700 over 4y, 4.5% of budgetYale University: $107,534 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetONWARD EUGENE: $105,958 over 1y, 12% of budgetFACTORY TWO INC: $93,218 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetLEHI AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC: $83,088 over 2y, 34% of budgetCOMPUTERS FOR CHILDREN INC: $81,087 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetGREATER DALLAS TAIWANESE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $76,863 over 2y, 26% of budgetUNITED ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE INC: $76,681 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRED WING IGNITE: $74,966 over 2y, 25% of budgetTHE GIVING BACK FUND: $70,631 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBTV IGNITE INC: $54,699 over 3y, 31% of budgetINTERNATIONAL COMPUTER SCIENCE INSTITUTE: $44,217 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE: $39,407 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $31,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNew York University: $17,720 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCYBERHIVE: $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds William Marsh Rice University ↗
  • Who funds WIRELESS RESEARCH CENTER OF NORTH CAROLINA ↗
  • Who funds DIGITALC ↗
  • Who funds ALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTCHESTER COUNTY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA AT MONROE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR DIGITAL PROGRESS ↗
  • Who funds KC DIGITAL DRIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LIBRARIES WITHOUT BORDERS ↗
  • Who funds THE ENTERPRISE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Yale University ↗
  • Who funds ONWARD EUGENE ↗
  • Who funds FACTORY TWO INC ↗
  • Who funds LEHI AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMPUTERS FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER DALLAS TAIWANESE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA1.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization US Ignite Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from US Ignite Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
  • Worcester Polytechnic Institute: 8% of income from government
  • Northeastern University: 7% of income from government
  • Onward Eugene: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to US Ignite Inc?

Find your warmest path to US Ignite Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 71 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on US Ignite’s filings →

More from the funding graph