Skip to content

· Private foundation

Urdahl Inc

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$19k
Granted FY2026still arriving
43
Grants FY2026still arriving
16
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

International$31kPublic Safety & Disaster$12kFood & Nutrition$11kHousing & Shelter$3kCivil Rights$3kHuman Services$3kPhilanthropy$3kRecreation & Sports$2kOther$0
02FY2026 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$400
Median grant
16
States reached
$404k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY ACTION$1,000
ELCA WORLD HUNGERDISASTER APPEAL$1,000
CARTER CENTER$1,000
COMMUNITY LUNCH CAPITAL HILL$1,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS MSF$996
GREAT PLAINS FOOD BANK$800
CHRISTIAN MISSION AID$800
Individual grant recipient$700
JAMESTOWN SALVATION ARMY$700
LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF$656
IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER OF MN$500
JAMES RIVER SENIOR CENTER$500
DAILY BREAD$500
ST JOHNS LUTHERAN CHURCH$500
COVENANT HOUSE$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–26, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $200 → 26%COVENANT HOUSE: $800 → 17%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $200 → 26%COVENANT HOUSE: $700 → 17%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $200 → 26%COVENANT HOUSE: $500 → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $500 → 17%PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS: $100 → 14%PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS: $100 → 14%PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS: $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
SD
IA
KY
VA
MD
KS
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of Urdahl Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 30% of the giving stays in ND; by stated purpose, 27%.

Urdahl Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 11% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$89k · 50 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

50 repeat relationships: 42 still active in FY2026, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

50
8

Total granted

$89k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+16%

Still filing today

44%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25’26
InternationalHuman ServicesFood & NutritionCrime & LegalEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CARTER CENTER INC
    6× · 2021–2026 · $4k · revenue +32%
  • LW
    LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC
    5× · 2022–2026 · $4k · revenue +3%
  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    6× · 2021–2026 · $4k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue +16%
  • EW
    ECA WORLD HUNGER DISASTER APPEAL
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $627
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
2
International Medical Corps

To save lives & relieve suffering through health interventions & related activities that strengthen communities affected by conflict, natural disasters & disease outbreaks.

International
3
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
4
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
5
Women's Refugee Commission Inc

To improve the lives and protect the rights of women, children and youth displaced by conflict and crisis. the women's refugee commission envisions a world in which refugees are safe, healthy and reliant and seeks to drive change in…

Human Services
6
International Crisis Group

Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…

International
7
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
8
International Committee of the Red Cross

The international committee of the red cross (switzerland)(icrc) is an impartial, neutral, and independent organization whose exclusively humanitarian mission is to protect the lives and dignity of victims of armed conflict and of violence…

International
9
The Global Hunger Project

The hunger project is working to create a world without hunger through women-centered, holistic development strategies that address the root causes of hunger and poverty. in 2025, it reached nearly 12.7 million people in over 10,000…

International
10
International Center for Research On Women

The international center for research for women (icrw) is a global research institute, with a mission to advance rights and opportunities for women, girls, and structurally excluded populations with actionable evidence and solutions.

International
11
World Hope International Inc

The purpose of world hope international, inc. (whi) includes providing assistance to economically disadvantaged people through long-term social transformation projects, including anti-trafficking protection, clean water, economic…

International
12
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lutheran World Relief Inc; the most unlike its peers is S a F E Shelter. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
19/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ELCA WORLD HUNGERDISASTER APPEAL: $5,000 · OtherELCA WORLD HUNGERDISASTER APPEALJAMESTOWN SALVATION ARMY: $4,500 · OtherJAMESTOWN SALVATION ARMYIndividual grant recipient: $4,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOMMUNITY LUNCH CAPITAL HILL: $3,400 · OtherCOMMUNITY LUNCH CAPITAL HILLDOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS MSF: $2,896 · OtherDOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS MSFUSA FOR UN HIGH COMMISSION FOR REFUGEES: $2,400 · OtherCOMMUNITY ACTION: $1,847 · OtherPARK RIVER BIBLE CAMP: $1,800 · Other+30 more: $24,005 · Other+30 moreChristian Mission Aid Inc: $5,100 · InternationalChristian Mission Aid IncTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $4,000 · InternationalTHE CARTER CENTER INCLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC: $3,683 · InternationalLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INCInternational Rescue Committee INC: $3,535 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committ…LUTHERAN PARTNERS IN GLOBAL MINISTRY INC: $2,500 · InternationalLUTHERAN PARTNERS IN GLOBAL …Mercy Ships International: $1,600 · InternationalMercy Ships InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 · InternationalOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $800 · International+1 more: $600 · InternationalGreat Plains Food Bank: $4,279 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY LUNCH ON CAPITOL HILL: $1,600 · Food & NutritionCOVENANT HOUSE: $2,500 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,600 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $600 · Human ServicesPartnership With Native Americans: $300 · Human ServicesSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $2,600 · Crime & LegalNative American Heritage Association: $1,200 · Crime & LegalUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $1,800 · EducationJAMESTOWN UNITED WAY: $900 · PhilanthropyImpact Foundation: $800 · PhilanthropyPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $1,500 · Health
Other$50,348International$23,818Food & Nutrition$5,879Human Services$5,000Crime & Legal$3,800Education$1,800Philanthropy$1,700Health$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChristian Mission Aid Inc: $5,100 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetGreat Plains Food Bank: $4,279 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $4,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC: $3,683 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $3,535 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $2,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN PARTNERS IN GLOBAL MINISTRY INC: $2,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $1,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $1,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY LUNCH ON CAPITOL HILL: $1,600 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $1,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetS A F E SHELTER: $1,400 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNative American Heritage Association: $1,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJAMESTOWN UNITED WAY: $900 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetImpact Foundation: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN IMMIGRATION & REFUGEE SERVICE INC DBA GLOBAL REFUGE: $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPartnership With Native Americans: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Christian Mission Aid Inc ↗
  • Who funds Great Plains Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN PARTNERS IN GLOBAL MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY LUNCH ON CAPITOL HILL ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds S A F E SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds Native American Heritage Association ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds JAMESTOWN UNITED WAY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Urdahl Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Urdahl Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 47%
  • Lutheran Immigration & Refugee Service Inc Dba Global Refuge: 100% of income from government
  • Lutheran World Relief Inc: 47% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Urdahl’s filings →

More from the funding graph