Skip to content
Plinth

· Community foundation

Upper Arlington Community Foundation

The UPPER ARLINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION is a home for philanthropy in upper arlington that leads efforts to connect our community around big ideas and projects, enhances our local nonprofits, and builds community leaders.

$1.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$606k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 88% of UPPER ARLINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $167k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $230k
  • $250k+1 grant · $606k
$21,635
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY OF UPPER ARLINGTON$606,000
UPPER ARLINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATIO$138,178
CITY OF UPPER ARLINGTON$91,925
UPPER ARLINGTON CITY SCHOOLS$29,525
TRI-VILLAGE LIONS$28,000
UPPER ARLINGTON PUBLIC LIBRARY$26,223
UA JUNIOR BASEBALL ASSOCIATION$21,635
UPPER ARLINGTON PUBLIC LIBRARY$20,000
CITY OF UPPER ARLINGTON$15,000
CITY OF UPPER ARLINGTON$14,030
UPPER ARLINGTON SOFTBALL$12,925
CITY OF UPPER ARLINGTON$8,910
CITY OF UPPER ARLINGTON$5,513
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%UPPER ARLINGTON CIVIC ASSOCIATION: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.6M · 7 repeat orgs$311k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +119% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
10

Total granted

$7.6M
$299k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+119%
0%

Still filing today

29%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CITY OF UPPER ARLINGTON
    6× · 2020–2025 · $7.0M
  • UA
    UPPER ARLINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATIO
    2× · 2024–2025 · $273k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE UPPER ARLINGTON LIBRARY
    5× · 2020–2025 · $174k · revenue +91% · 90% of their budget

Funded once

  • UA
    UPPER ARLINGTON YOUTH FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2024 · $138k · revenue 0% · 60% of their budget
  • UA
    UPPER ARLINGTON LACROSSE ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2022 · $59k · revenue -61%
  • UA
    UPPER ARLINGTON PUBLIC LIBRARY
    one grant, 2022 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CITY OF UPPER ARLINGTON — $7,007,504 · OtherCITY OF UPPER ARLINGTONUPPER ARLINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATIO — $273,178 · Other+11 more — $275,221 · OtherUPPER ARLINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $664,206 · Community ImprovementUPPER ARLINGTON YOUTH FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION — $137,921 · Recreation & SportsUPPER ARLINGTON LACROSSE ASSOCIATION — $58,554 · Recreation & SportsFRIENDS OF THE UPPER ARLINGTON LIBRARY — $174,020 · EducationUPPER ARLINGTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $11,042 · PhilanthropyUPPER ARLINGTON CIVIC ASSOCIATION — $10,000 · Human Services
Other$7,555,903Community Improvement$664,206Recreation & Sports$196,475Education$174,020Philanthropy$11,042Human Services$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUPPER ARLINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $664,206 over 3y, 64% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE UPPER ARLINGTON LIBRARY — $174,020 over 5y, 90% of budgetUPPER ARLINGTON YOUTH FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION — $137,921 over 1y, 60% of budgetUPPER ARLINGTON LACROSSE ASSOCIATION — $58,554 over 1y, 13% of budgetINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LIONS CLUB — $38,000 over 2y, 57% of budgetUPPER ARLINGTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $11,042 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetUPPER ARLINGTON CIVIC ASSOCIATION — $10,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UPPER ARLINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE UPPER ARLINGTON LIBRARY
  • Who funds UPPER ARLINGTON YOUTH FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds UPPER ARLINGTON LACROSSE ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LIONS CLUB
  • Who funds UPPER ARLINGTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds UPPER ARLINGTON CIVIC ASSOCIATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Columbus FoundationOH12.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Columbus Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Upper Arlington Community Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph