Skip to content

· Public charity

University Physicians & Surgeons Inc

To support the clinical, educational, research and services missions of the joan c.

$13k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$3.3MCommunity Improvement$2.7MHealth$2.0MPublic Benefit$93kRecreation & Sports$62kPublic Safety & Disaster$50kArts & Culture$43kPhilanthropy$25k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$12,786
Median grant
1
States reached
$184M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARSHALL HEALTH NETWORK$12,786
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%WV MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS HEALTH: $10k → 15%WV HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY COMMISSION: $7k → 18%CITY OF MADISON: $93k → 19%MARSHALL UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORP: $1.6M → 19%KINGS DAUGHTERS MEDICAL CENTER: $13k → 18%MARSHALL UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORP: $823k → 19%MARSHALL UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORP: $600k → 19%MARSHALL UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORP: $300k → 19%MARSHALL UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORP: $224k → 19%MARSHALL RECREATION CENTER: $6k → 19%FAMILY MEDICINE FOUNDATION: $6k → 19%MARSHALL UNIVERSITY: $1.6M → 19%MARSHALL UNIVERSITY: $1.5M → 19%CABELL HUNTINGTON HOSPITAL: $550k → 19%CABELL HUNTINGTON HOSPITAL: $468k → 19%MARSHALL UNIVERSITY: $222k → 19%HUNTINGTON MUSEUM OF ART: $16k → 19%MARSHALL HEALTH NETWORK: $13k → 19%HUNTINGTON MUSEUM OF ART: $12k → 19%CABELL HUNTINGTON HOSPITAL: $11k → 19%MARSHALL ARTIST SERIESMARSHALL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $8k → 19%MARSHALL ARTIST SERIESMARSHALL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $8k → 19%CABELL HUNTINGTON HOSPITAL: $7k → 19%HUNTINGTON MUSEUM OF ART: $7k → 19%THE RECOVERY POINT: $7k → 19%THE RECOVERY POINT: $5k → 19%HUNTINGTON AREA DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL: $5k → 19%HUNTINGTON AREA DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL: $5k → 19%ST MARY'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $9k → 19%MARSHALL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $26k → 19%MARSHALL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $15k → 19%CABELL MIDLAND HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETICS: $9k → 19%CABELL MIDLAND HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETICS: $8k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.1M · 11 repeat orgs$204k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
8

Total granted

$8.1M
$192k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+92%

Still filing today

82%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthCommunity ImprovementEducationArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    MARSHALL UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION
    5× · 2019–2024 · $3.6M · revenue +99%
  • CH
    CABELL HUNTINGTON HOSPITAL INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $1.0M · revenue +62%
  • MU
    MARSHALL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED
    4× · 2018–2022 · $56k · revenue +541%

Funded once

  • CO
    CITY OF MADISON
    one grant, 2022 · $93k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • AH
    ASHLAND HOSPITAL CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $13k · revenue +137%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University Physicians & Surgeons Inc

To support the clinical, educational, research and services missions of the joan c. edwards school of medicine in order to build a healthier tomorrow.

—
2
West Virginia University Medical Corporation

To support the West Virginia University School of Medicine in the furtherance of its charitable, scientific, and educational purposes by serving as its faculty practice plan and providing a full range of business management services to its…

Health
3
St Mary's Medical Center Inc

We are inspired by the love of christ to provide quality health care in ways which respect the god-given dignity of each person and the sacredness of human life.

—
4
Pleasant Valley Hospital

To operate an acute care hospital facility for the citizens of point pleasant, west virginia and the surrounding communities and counties.

Health
5
West Virginia State Medical Association

The west virginia state medical association is organized for the purpose of providing services to its members, who are all either physicians practicing in the state of west virginia or medical students. specifically, the association serves…

—
6
West Virginia University Hospitals Inc

WVU Hospitals WVUH exists to provide a quality healthcare system, including tertiary services, to the citizens of WV and the surrounding region. Equally important, WVUH is committed by law and philosophy to be the primary clinical site for…

Health
7
University Healthcare Physicians Inc

Our mission is to improve the health of Eastern Panhandle residents through excellence in health professions education, community service, research, and accessible patient-centered health care.

—
8
West Virginia University Medical Corp Charleston Division Dba Wvupc

The mission of West Virginia University School of Medicine Charleston Division d/b/a West Virginia University Physicians of Charleston, is to support the West Virginia University School of Medicine & Improve the lives of our patients,…

Education
9
Cabell Huntington Hospital Foundation Inc

Grants to cabell huntington hospital, inc. for various support.

Health
10
Augusta Medical Group

to strengthen the health and well-being of all people in our communities.

Health
11
Richmond Memorial Health Foundation
Health
12
Belmont Professional Associates Inc

To improve the communitys health through the efficient provision, coordination, and integration of quality health services, health education, and research. To provide compassionate, quality health services according to the spiritual,…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Marshall Health Network Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
16/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MARSHALL UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION: $3,556,261 · Community ImprovementMARSHALL UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION+1 more: $10,000 · Community ImprovementMarshall University: $3,297,699 · OtherMarshall University+6 more: $214,728 · Other+6 moreCABELL HUNTINGTON HOSPITAL INC: $1,037,158 · HealthCABELL HUNTINGT…+6 more: $69,641 · Health+6 moreMARSHALL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $56,000 · EducationCABELL MIDLAND HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC BOOSTERS INC: $16,467 · EducationHUNTINGTON MUSEUM OF ART INC: $35,050 · Arts & CultureFOUNDATION FOR THE TRI-STATE COMMUNITY INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyTHE RECOVERY POINT OF HUNTINGTON INC: $12,007 · Housing & Shelter
Community Improvement$3,566,261Other$3,512,427Health$1,106,799Education$72,467Arts & Culture$35,050Philanthropy$25,000Housing & Shelter$12,007

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARSHALL UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION: $3,556,261 over 5y, 3.9% of budgetCABELL HUNTINGTON HOSPITAL INC: $1,037,158 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMARSHALL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $56,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBIG GREEN SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $39,533 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHUNTINGTON MUSEUM OF ART INC: $35,050 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR THE TRI-STATE COMMUNITY INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $20,355 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS: $20,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetMARSHALL HEALTH NETWORK INC: $12,786 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASHLAND HOSPITAL CORPORATION: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RECOVERY POINT OF HUNTINGTON INC: $12,007 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS HEALTH PROGRAM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetOUR JOBS OUR CHILDREN OUR FUTURE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetST MARY'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetFAMILY MEDICINE FOUNDATION OF WV: $6,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetLILY'S PLACE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Mary's Medical Center IncWV15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Mary's Medical Center Inc · The Huntington Foundation Inc · Pallottine Foundation of Huntington West Virginia · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization University Physicians & Surgeons Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from University Physicians & Surgeons Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on University Physicians & Surgeons’ filings →

    More from the funding graph