Skip to content
United Way of White County Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

United Way of White County Inc

To increase the organized capacity of people in white county to care for one another.

$86k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Employment$779kHuman Services$363kEducation$114kCivil Rights$68kHousing & Shelter$40kYouth Development$29kHealth$27kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $58,400, the rows itemized in this filing. The $85,565 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $27,165 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
$12,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$182k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CASA OF WHITE COUNTY$18,000
WHITE CO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PREVENTI$15,000
JACOB'S PLACE HOMELESS MISSION$12,000
CHILD SAFETY CENTER OF WHITE COUNTY$6,800
RACHEL'S HOUSE$6,600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%WHITE COUNTY AGING PROGRAM: $19k → 16%WHITE COUNTY AGING PROGRAM: $17k → 16%RACHEL'S HOUSE: $7k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$986k · 9 repeat orgs$780k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
5

Total granted

$986k
$758k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+1%

Still filing today

78%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyCivil RightsHousing & ShelterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • US
    United Steelworkers International Local Union 369
    2× · 2018–2020 · $526k · revenue +22%
  • SS
    Sunshine School
    3× · 2022–2024 · $108k · revenue +1%
  • CO
    CASA of White County Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $86k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • A
    ALLOCATIONS
    one grant, 2017 · $287k
  • A
    Allocationsgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $254k · revenue +76%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF WHITE COUNTY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $205k · revenue +1% · 70% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
White Family Care Services

Our misson is to provide social services to children, teens and adults. Our most significant activity is providing residential care services to individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

Human Services
2
White County Food Pantry Inc

Purchase food & distribute to needy families.

—
3
White County Senior Citizen

To provide social services White and Hamilton county )IL) senior citizens. Activities are specified under Title III of the Older Americans Act. There is also a small transportation program administered by the Illinois Department of Human…

—
4
Wise County Domestic Violence Task Force

To assist sexual assault and domestic violence victims. To operate a safe shelter and provide counseling services.

Crime & Legal
5
West Plains Regional Animal Shelter

To Provide a safe place for animals and unite them with permanent homes

Animals
6
Boone County Casa

Advocacy for abused and neglected children

Crime & Legal
7
White Sulphur Springs Emergency Medical Services

Provide rescue emergency services for the local community and related community service

Public Safety & Disaster
8
Wright County Childrens Home

Provide care, housing and training to displaced and disadvantaged children

Human Services
9
Whole Living Recovery

Recovery housing for women/children

Health
10
The Caring Place a Center for Abused Women and Children Inc

Caring for abused women & children

—
11
Cave City Nursing Home

Long-term healthcare-the nursing home operates a 90-bed facility that provides long-term healthcare services for the elderly and disabled residents of sharp county arkansas and the surrounding area.

—
12
Sumner County Casa Inc

Advocacy for abused and neglectedchildren

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is White County Domestic Violence Prevention Inc; the most unlike its peers is United Steelworkers International Local Union 369. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

United Steelworkers International Local Union 369: $525,558 · OtherUnited Steelworkers International Local Union 369ALLOCATIONS: $287,458 · OtherALLOCATIONSAllocations: $253,858 · OtherAllocationsSunshine School: $107,500 · OtherSunshine SchoolCHILD SAFETY CENTER OF WHITE COUNTY: $49,300 · Other+4 more: $76,000 · Other+4 moreUNITED WAY OF WHITE COUNTY INC: $205,082 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF…WHITE COUNTY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PREVENTION INC: $74,000 · Human ServicesWHITE COUNTY AGING PROGRAM INC: $36,000 · Human ServicesRACHELS HOUSE: $6,600 · Human ServicesCASA of White County Inc: $85,500 · Civil RightsJACOBS PLACE HOMELESS MISSION: $52,000 · Housing & ShelterWhite County Single Parent Scholarship Fund Inc: $6,625 · Education
Other$1,299,674Philanthropy$205,082Human Services$116,600Civil Rights$85,500Housing & Shelter$52,000Education$6,625

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF WHITE COUNTY INC: $205,082 over 1y, 70% of budgetSunshine School: $107,500 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetCASA of White County Inc: $85,500 over 4y, 14% of budgetWHITE COUNTY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PREVENTION INC: $74,000 over 3y, 8.4% of budgetJACOBS PLACE HOMELESS MISSION: $52,000 over 4y, 15% of budgetWHITE COUNTY AGING PROGRAM INC: $36,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetNEWHOPE SPECIALIZED INDUSTRIES INC: $26,500 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetWhite County Single Parent Scholarship Fund Inc: $6,625 over 1y, 14% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of White County Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of White County Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of White County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home