Skip to content
United Way of the Southern Tier Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

United Way of the Southern Tier Inc

To unite and prioritize resources to improve the quality of life for every person and family in our community.

$3.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
68
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$535k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$20MYouth Development$1.7MFood & Nutrition$1.4MHousing & Shelter$1.0MEducation$888kPhilanthropy$610kCrime & Legal$441kPublic Safety & Disaster$389kOther$0
02FY2025 · 68 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 68 grants below total $2,818,258, the rows itemized in this filing. The $3,007,695 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $189,437 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k22 grants · $168k
  • $10k–50k31 grants · $611k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.2M
  • $250k+2 grants · $793k
$15,468
Median grant
9
States reached
$6.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRO ACTION OF STEUBEN AND YATES INC$535,025
FAMILY SERVICE SOCIETY INC$257,757
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF STEUBEN COUNTY$163,867
THE SALVATION ARMY (OF STEUBEN COUNTY)$157,583
CIDS$150,815
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CHEMUNG COUNTY$101,510
FAMILY SERVICES OF CHEMUNG COUNTY INC$88,266
FAITH IN ACTION STEUBEN COUNTY$84,108
UNITED WAY OF THE CAPE FEAR AREA$82,687
HOME & HEALTH CARE SERVICES INC$82,175
UNITED WAY OF GREATER CHARLOTTE$80,775
ARBOR HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT$69,607
INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN SERVICES$68,640
SALVATION ARMY - ELMIRA$64,773
CATAWBA COUNTY UNITED WAY$51,464
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $12.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PRO ACTION OF STEUBEN AND YATES INC: $732k → 13%PRO ACTION OF STEUBEN AND YATES INC: $706k → 13%PRO ACTION OF STEUBEN AND YATES INC: $618k → 13%PRO ACTION OF STEUBEN AND YATES INC: $589k → 13%PRO ACTION OF STEUBEN AND YATES INC: $554k → 13%PRO ACTION OF STEUBEN AND YATES INC: $535k → 13%PRO ACTION OF STEUBEN AND YATES INC: $514k → 13%PRO ACTION OF STEUBEN AND YATES INC: $483k → 13%PRO ACTION OF STEUBEN AND YATES INC: $481k → 13%CIDS: $225k → 15%CIDS: $180k → 15%CIDS: $176k → 15%CIDS: $174k → 15%CIDS: $173k → 15%CIDS: $173k → 15%CIDS: $169k → 15%CIDS: $151k → 15%CIDS: $151k → 15%FAITH IN ACTION STEUBEN COUNTY: $85k → 13%FAITH IN ACTION STEUBEN COUNTY: $84k → 13%FAITH IN ACTION STEUBEN COUNTY: $84k → 13%ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM: $86k → 15%FAITH IN ACTION STEUBEN COUNTY: $40k → 13%ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM: $86k → 15%FAITH IN ACTION STEUBEN COUNTY: $36k → 13%FAITH IN ACTION STEUBEN COUNTY: $34k → 13%ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM: $76k → 15%YWCA OF ELMIRA & THE TWIN TIERS: $76k → 15%ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM: $73k → 15%YWCA OF ELMIRA & THE TWIN TIERS: $72k → 15%ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM: $71k → 15%ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM: $69k → 15%ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM: $67k → 15%ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM: $47k → 15%ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM: $47k → 15%FAMILY SERVICE SOCIETY INC: $311k → 13%FAMILY SERVICE SOCIETY INC: $306k → 13%NEIGHBORHOOD TRANSFORMATION CENTER INC: $41k → 15%FAMILY SERVICE SOCIETY INC: $292k → 13%FAMILY SERVICE SOCIETY INC: $279k → 13%FAMILY SERVICE SOCIETY INC: $272k → 13%FAMILY SERVICE SOCIETY INC: $271k → 13%FAMILY SERVICE SOCIETY INC: $258k → 13%FAMILY SERVICE SOCIETY INC: $258k → 13%FAMILY SERVICE SOCIETY INC: $258k → 13%FINGER LAKES CHAPTER AMERICAN RED CROSS: $100k → 13%FINGER LAKES CHAPTER AMERICAN RED CROSS: $93k → 13%FINGER LAKES CHAPTER AMERICAN RED CROSS: $70k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NY
MA
PA
KY
VA
AZ
NC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$27M · 64 repeat orgs$434k to everyone else

64 repeat relationships: 43 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

64
9

Total granted

$27M
$107k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+25%

Still filing today

73%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $328k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyHealthEducationFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PA
    PRO ACTION OF STEUBEN AND YATES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $5.2M · revenue +73%
  • FS
    Family Service Society Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.6M · revenue +20%
  • CI
    COMPREHENSIVE INTERDISCIPLINARY DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.6M · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • CA
    COMMUNITY ARTS OF ELMIRA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $22k · revenue +363%
  • CI
    COMET INFORMATION LLC
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • BS
    BOY SCOUTS FIVE RIVERS COUNICL INC
    one grant, 2019 · $19k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way of Central New York Inc

To improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of our community.

Philanthropy
2
Unity House of Cayuga County Inc

Unity house's mission is to empower and enrich the lives of people in recovery, coping with a mental illness, and/or diagnosed with a developmental disability. this is accomplished by offering supports and services in an inclusive,…

Health
3
United Way of New York State

To strengthen the capacity of local united ways through their charitable human service activities to be leaders in achieving results that improve the lives of all new yorkers.

Philanthropy
4
United Way of the Adirondack Region Inc

To be a leader in community partnership building and to increase the organized capacity of people to care for one another.

Philanthropy
5
Ulster County Community Action Committee Inc

Serving the most in need in ulster county. our program services are designed to respond to changing community needs, to strengthen families, to foster opportunities for education and training, to increase employability, to initiate…

Human Services
6
Tioga United Way Inc

Efficiently allocate and organize donations to local charitable organizations.

Philanthropy
7
Cortland County Child Development - Day Care Program Inc

To provide daycare and child development services to residents of Cortland County

Human Services
8
Suny Cortland Child Care Center Inc

The suny cortland child care center is dedicated to providing affordable child care for the children of the college's employees and students, which meets the highest nationally recognized standards. qualified staff provide an educational…

Human Services
9
United Way of Greater Rochester Inc

United way of greater rochester's mission is to unite the good will and resources of the greater rochester community so that everyone can thrive. united way supports a broad network of human service organizations, community initiatives and…

—
10
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
11
Greene County United Way Inc

To be clearly recognized as the most effective way to serve the most people through organizing voluntary efforts aimed at strengthening the Greene County community.

Philanthropy
12
Child Care Council of Dutchess and Putnam Inc

To promote affordable and quality child care, provide information and support to families, and strengthen childhood workforce in dutchess and putnam counties.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Rochester; the most unlike its peers is United Way of Massachusetts Bay Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

70 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 70 of the 90 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
67/70
Grantees still filing
40/70
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PRO ACTION OF STEUBEN AND YATES INC: $5,211,342 · Human ServicesPRO ACTION OF STEUBEN AND YATES INCFamily Service Society Inc: $2,626,782 · Human ServicesFamily Service Society IncCOMPREHENSIVE INTERDISCIPLINARY DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES INC: $1,572,529 · Human ServicesCOMPREHENSIVE INTERDISCIPLINARY DEVELOPMENTAL SERV…ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM INC OF CHE: $674,132 · Human ServicesECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM INC OF CHEVOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS PROGRAM: $445,640 · Human Services+14 more: $1,491,981 · Human Services+14 moreTHE SALVATION ARMY: $2,135,112 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYCATH CHARITIES OF STEUBEN COUNTY: $1,804,387 · OtherCATH CHARITIES OF STEUBEN COUNTYCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF ROCHESTER: $1,277,543 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF ROCHE…HOME & HEALTH CARE SERVICES INC: $758,725 · OtherHOME & HEALTH CARE SERVICES INCBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA FIVE RIVERS COUNCIL INC: $581,527 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA FIVE RIVERS COUNCIL …GIRL SCOUTS OF NYPENN PATHWAYS INC: $438,522 · Other+37 more: $3,129,848 · Other+37 moreARBOR HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT: $973,665 · HealthFAMILY SERVICES OF CHEMUNG COUNTY INC: $774,150 · HealthS2AY RURAL HEALTH NETWORK INC: $63,667 · Health+3 more: $30,643 · HealthTHE INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN SERVICES INC: $738,735 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ELMIRA-CORNING AND THE FINGER LAKES INC: $106,175 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF THE SOUTHERN TIER INC: $99,188 · PhilanthropyUnited Way of the Cape Fear Area Inc: $82,687 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF GREATER CHARLOTTE INC: $80,775 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF SCHUYLER COUNTY INC: $70,024 · PhilanthropyCATAWBA COUNTY UNITED WAY INC: $56,649 · Philanthropy+7 more: $91,624 · PhilanthropyCorning Meals on Wheels Inc: $543,562 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS OF CHEMUNG COUNTY INC: $494,853 · Food & NutritionFRIENDS OF THE ADDISON YOUTH CENTER: $267,727 · Youth DevelopmentSOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $109,596 · Youth DevelopmentSTEUBEN SENIOR SERVICES FUND: $100,045 · EducationFAMILY READING PARTNERSHIP OF CHEMUNG VALLEY: $88,884 · EducationCHEMUNG VALLEY MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $83,165 · EducationTHE ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL FOR MATH AND SCIENCE: $46,233 · Education
Human Services$12,022,406Other$10,125,664Health$1,842,125Philanthropy$1,325,857Food & Nutrition$1,038,415Youth Development$377,323Education$318,327

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPRO ACTION OF STEUBEN AND YATES INC: $5,211,342 over 9y, 4.4% of budgetFamily Service Society Inc: $2,626,782 over 9y, 15% of budgetCOMPREHENSIVE INTERDISCIPLINARY DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES INC: $1,572,529 over 9y, 13% of budgetARBOR HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT: $973,665 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetFAMILY SERVICES OF CHEMUNG COUNTY INC: $774,150 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetHOME & HEALTH CARE SERVICES INC: $758,725 over 9y, 8.3% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN SERVICES INC: $738,735 over 9y, 3.5% of budgetECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM INC OF CHE: $674,132 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA FIVE RIVERS COUNCIL INC: $581,527 over 8y, 8.4% of budgetCorning Meals on Wheels Inc: $543,562 over 9y, 18% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF CHEMUNG COUNTY INC: $494,853 over 9y, 8.3% of budgetVOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS PROGRAM: $445,640 over 9y, 48% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NYPENN PATHWAYS INC: $438,522 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetCHEMUNG COUNTY CHILD CARE COUNCIL INC: $307,576 over 8y, 3.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $278,063 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ADDISON YOUTH CENTER: $267,727 over 9y, 24% of budgetLEGAL ASSISTANCE OF WESTERN NEW YORK INC: $246,909 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetNONNIE HOOD PARENT RESOURCE CENTER INC: $195,771 over 7y, 11% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ELMIRA AND THE TWIN TIERS INC: $193,208 over 4y, 5.3% of budgetCASA of the Southern Tier Inc: $168,978 over 9y, 25% of budgetHORNELL CHILDREN'S HOME: $164,045 over 9y, 3.6% of budgetHORNELL AREA CONCERN FOR YOUTH INC: $159,034 over 9y, 7.7% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF ROCHESTER: $155,362 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRI COUNTY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK: $147,309 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE SOUTHERN FINGER LAKES INC: $122,934 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetCorning Comfort Care Inc Bampas House: $118,282 over 5y, 6.8% of budgetCORNING DAY PROGRAMS INC: $111,786 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetSOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $109,596 over 9y, 11% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ELMIRA-CORNING AND THE FINGER LAKES INC: $106,175 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD TRANSFORMATION CENTER: $102,235 over 5y, 29% of budgetSTEUBEN SENIOR SERVICES FUND: $100,045 over 3y, 17% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE SOUTHERN TIER INC: $99,188 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetFAMILY READING PARTNERSHIP OF CHEMUNG VALLEY: $88,884 over 9y, 36% of budgetCHEMUNG VALLEY MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $83,165 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetUnited Way of the Cape Fear Area Inc: $82,687 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER CHARLOTTE INC: $80,775 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SCHUYLER COUNTY INC: $70,024 over 9y, 11% of budgetS2AY RURAL HEALTH NETWORK INC: $63,667 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCHEMUNG COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY & SPCA: $60,873 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetCATAWBA COUNTY UNITED WAY INC: $56,649 over 2y, 13% of budgetSTEWART PARK HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND COMPANY INC: $54,212 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetTHE ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL FOR MATH AND SCIENCE: $46,233 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetTHE SENIOR CENTER INC: $43,410 over 2y, 16% of budgetTHE POTTERS HANDS FOUNDATION INC: $41,773 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetCHRISTIAN LEARNING CENTER: $31,409 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER INC: $24,763 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetRegional Science and Discovery Center: $23,851 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetHORSEHEADS FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $23,202 over 2y, 5.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PRO ACTION OF STEUBEN AND YATES INC ↗
  • Who funds Family Service Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMPREHENSIVE INTERDISCIPLINARY DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds ARBOR HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICES OF CHEMUNG COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds HOME & HEALTH CARE SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM INC OF CHE ↗
  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA FIVE RIVERS COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds Corning Meals on Wheels Inc ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF CHEMUNG COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF NYPENN PATHWAYS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHEMUNG COUNTY CHILD CARE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ADDISON YOUTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL ASSISTANCE OF WESTERN NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds NONNIE HOOD PARENT RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ELMIRA AND THE TWIN TIERS INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA of the Southern Tier Inc ↗
  • Who funds HORNELL CHILDREN'S HOME ↗
  • Who funds HORNELL AREA CONCERN FOR YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF ROCHESTER ↗
  • Who funds THE TRI COUNTY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE SOUTHERN FINGER LAKES INC ↗
  • Who funds Corning Comfort Care Inc Bampas House ↗
  • Who funds CORNING DAY PROGRAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ELMIRA-CORNING AND THE FINGER LAKES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Corning Incorporated …The Triangle FundFinger Lakes Performi…The Hilliard Foundati…Tioga Downs Regional …Douglas G Anderson Le…The Anderson Foundati…United Way of Tompkin…JM McDonald Foundatio…The Bethesda Foundati…Meadows Charitable Tr…
Community Foundation of Elmira-Corning and the Finger Lakes IncNY75.4× affinity34 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Elmira-Corning and the Finger Lakes Inc · Corning Incorporated Foundation · The Triangle Fund · Finger Lakes Performing Provider System Inc · The Hilliard Foundation Inc · Tioga Downs Regional Community Foundation Inc · Douglas G Anderson Leigh R Evans Foundation · The Anderson Foundation Inc · United Way of Tompkins County Inc · JM McDonald Foundation Inc · The Bethesda Foundation Inc · Meadows Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of the Southern Tier Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of the Southern Tier Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 23%
  • United Way of Massachusetts Bay Inc: 23% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
28report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 90 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on United Way of the Southern Tier’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home