· Public charity
United Way of St Lucie & Okeechobee Inc
To improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of our community.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 16 grants below total $393,087 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $507,696 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $114,609 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $24k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $199k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $170k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MUSTARD SEED MINISTRIES OF FORT PIERCE INC | $115,120 |
| FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH | $55,000 |
| HELPING PEOPLE SUCCEED | $40,000 |
| UNITED AGAINST POVERTY | $30,000 |
| ARC OF ST LUCIE | $18,567 |
| GRACE WAY VILLAGE | $16,800 |
| LIFE BUILDERS OF THE TREASURE COAST INC | $15,000 |
| HEALTHY START COALITION OF ST LUCIE COUNTY INC | $15,000 |
| ALZHEIMER'S COMMUNITY CARE | $15,000 |
| THE INNER TRUTH PROJECT | $15,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $14,000 |
| 211 PALM BEACH & TREASURE COAST | $10,000 |
| COUNCIL ON AGING OF ST LUCIE | $10,000 |
| LIGHT OF THE WORLD CHARITIES | $9,000 |
| OKEECHOBEE EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $8,100 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +55% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.
29 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MSMUSTARD SEED MINISTRIES INC7× · 2018–2025 · $883k · revenue +272%
- TTTYKES & TEENS INC4× · 2018–2021 · $200k · revenue +55%
- 2P211 Palm BeachTreasure Coast Inc7× · 2018–2025 · $192k · revenue +148%
Funded once
- PLPROJECT LIFT INC2× · 2023–2024 · $21k · revenue -17%
- TCTREASURE COAST FOOD BANK INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +202%
- HCHIBISCUS CHILDREN'S CENTER INC2× · 2023–2024 · $12k · revenue -3%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The florida center supports the healthy development of young children, specializing in those with delays, disabilities or mental health challenges. our mission- "to help build and foster strong families and expand the potential of young…
For 80 years, suncoast center, inc. has held true to its mission of "strengthening, protecting, and restoring lives for a healthy community" by providing a comprehensive range of evidence-based services that address emotional wellness,…
Preventing child abuse, restoring healing, and strengthening all children and their families through advocacy, treatment, and shelter.
The scarc, inc. evaluation, training and emplyment center provides therapeutic work, supported independent living, adult basic education, socialization opportunities, and transportation to adults who are developmentally disabled and who…
The mission of the health planning council of southwest florida is to improve the health and wellness of our community with pride: -providing and promoting early health intervention -reducing health disparities -increasing access to…
To deliver a well coordinated and multi-disciplined response to child abuse in an environment that puts children first
Since its creation in 1974, south county mental health center, inc. "center" has brought quality mental health and substance abuse care to our communities in a manner which enhances and preserves human dignity. through local support,…
Legal representation of children.
To provide administrative support of its wholly-owned subsidiaries whose mission is to provide hospice, grief counseling, education and other services to patients and families dealing with death and dying so that they might live as fully…
Provide transitional housing and supportive services to homeless mothers and children. we are committed to alleviating the needs of the disadvantaged families by empowering single mothers whose goal it is to acheive self…
Providing home, hope and healing to abused and neglected children and teens in southwest florida.
To establish a system of care guaranteeing that all women have access to prenatal care and that all infants have access to services that promote optimal growth and development.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hibiscus Children's Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Multi Cultural Resource Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 6% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF ST LUCIE & OKEECHOBEE INC ↗
- Who funds MUSTARD SEED MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds ST LUCIE COUNTY HEALTH ACCESS NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds TYKES & TEENS INC ↗
- Who funds 211 Palm BeachTreasure Coast Inc ↗
- Who funds GRACE WAY VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds EARLY LEARNING COALITION OF ST LUCIE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds HPS Helping People Succeed Inc ↗
- Who funds HEALTHY START COALITION OF ST LUCIE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF ST LUCIE INDIAN RIVER AND OKEECHOBEE COUNTIES I ↗
- Who funds LIFEBUILDERS OF THE TREASURE COAST INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED AGAINST POVERTY INC ↗
- Who funds THE INNER TRUTH PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds PACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S COMMUNITY CARE INC ↗
- Who funds The ARC of St Lucie County ↗
- Who funds SAFESPACE INC ↗
- Who funds SARAHS KITCHEN OF THE TREASURE COA ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL ON AGING OF ST LUCIE INC ↗
- Who funds Drug Abuse Treatment Association Inc ↗
- Who funds LIGHT OF THE WORLD CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds OKEECHOBEE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MULTI CULTURAL RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds PROJECT LIFT INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF STLUCIE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds TREASURE COAST FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds HIBISCUS CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING SVCS OF THE TREAS CST INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of Martin County Inc · The Community Foundation - Martin / St Lucie Inc · W and H Thomas Charitable Trust · Community Foundation for Palm Beach and Martin Counties Inc · United Way of Indian River County Inc · Allegany Franciscan Ministries Inc · Bernard a Egan Foundation Inc · Hobe Sound Community Chest Inc · Southeast Florida Behavioral Health Network Inc · The United Way of Lee County Inc · Impact 100 of Indian River County · John's Island Community Service League Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Way of St Lucie & Okeechobee Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Safespace Inc — 25% of income from government
- 211 Palm BeachTreasure Coast Inc — 17% of income from government
- The Children's Home Society of Florida — 6% of income from government
- Grace Way Village Inc — 4% of income from government
- Hibiscus Children's Center Inc — 3% of income from government
- Treasure Coast Food Bank Inc — 2% of income from government
- Pace Center for Girlsinc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.