· Public charity
Eo Companies
Eo strengthens communities by expanding education, building the workforce, and addressing economic challenges, so people have more opportunities to succeed.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 78% of EO COMPANIES’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 26 grants below total $6,031,680 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $6,906,553 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $874,873 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $50k–250k15 grants · $2.4M
- $250k+11 grants · $3.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BALLAD HEALTH CENTER EARLY LEARNING | $634,460 |
| LIVE LAUGH LEARN | $459,464 |
| RADFORD CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER | $348,809 |
| ITTY BITTIES ACADEMY | $298,839 |
| THE IMAGINATION STATION | $292,122 |
| BRIGHT BEGINNINGS DAY CARE INC | $283,869 |
| BALLAD HEALTH CENTER EARLY LEARNING | $275,639 |
| RAINBOW RIDERS CHILDCARE CENTER | $274,947 |
| KIDS KIKKIN' IT PREK | $265,800 |
| LIDDLE TYKES DAYCARE | $264,955 |
| TENDER TOTS LEARNING ACADEMY | $252,558 |
| VA TECH CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER | $244,081 |
| BALLAD HEALTH CENTER EARLY LEARNING | $222,151 |
| UNITED WAY OD SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA | $211,306 |
| BLUE MOUNTAIN THERAPY | $210,528 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $2.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 22% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +67% since the first grant, against +46% for the ones you funded once.
40 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RCRADFORD CHILD DEVELOPMENT INC5× · 2020–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +624% · 88% of their budget
- VIVALLEY INTERFAITH CHILD CARE CENTER INC5× · 2020–2025 · $613k · revenue +67% · 29% of their budget
- PCPULASKI COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER4× · 2021–2025 · $412k · revenue +141% · 41% of their budget
Funded once
- GHGILES HEALTH AND FAMILY CENTER INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +83%
- KCKUEHG CORP DBA KINDERCARE EDUCATION LLCone grant, 2021 · $68k
- MTMARY THOMASone grant, 2023 · $67k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide quality early childhood care and education through: 1) offering developmentally-appropriate educational programs, 2) providing for the social, emotional, physical, and cognitive development of each child, and 3) encouraging…
Contracts with child care resource agencies to provide assistance to working parents in locating and identifying child care programs and to collect, maintain, and disseminate
Education of childcare workers
Gap inc operates a community based early child care and education program providing high quality and comprehensive services to children ages 6 weeks to 5 years and thier families.
Child care and pre-school program open year round for children ages fifteen months to five years of age.
Child care and education
To provide child care
Training for early child care
The establishment and operation of a child learning/daycare facility for the use, benefit, and general welfare of the children of rappahannock county, virginia.
Holyoke Community Childcare HCC cultivates child, family and community well-being and progress.
To promote each child's development by providing high quality early childhood education.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Eo Companies and the most unlike its peers is Southwest Virginia Workforce Development Board. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Ballad Health Center for Early Learning ↗
- Who funds RADFORD CHILD DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds VALLEY INTERFAITH CHILD CARE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ROOFTOP OF VIRGINIA CAP ↗
- Who funds PULASKI COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE INCORPORATED OF VIRGINIA ↗
- Who funds EO COMPANIES ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Club of the Mountain Empire ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD ↗
- Who funds GILES HEALTH AND FAMILY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Girls Incorporated of Bristol ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The James W and Frances Gibson McGlothlin Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Eo Companies funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.