Skip to content
United Way of Southeastern Idaho at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

United Way of Southeastern Idaho

The UNITED WAY OF SOUTHEASTERN IDAHO builds powerful partnerships to improve outcomes for children, families, and individuals in need.

$332k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
—
States reached
$52k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02Its granteesRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Human Services$936kHealth$381kFood & Nutrition$333kHousing & Shelter$183kCrime & Legal$136kCommunity Improvement$51kYouth Development$31kRecreation & Sports$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $236k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $52k
$11,500
Median grant
—
States reached
$777k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
POCATELLO FREE CLINIC$52,000
FAMILY SERVICE ALLIANCE OF SE ID$30,000
BRIGHT TOMORROWS$30,000
SEICAA MEALS ON WHEELS$30,000
AID FOR FRIENDS (PROGRAM)$24,000
6TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT CASA$16,831
Individual grant recipient$16,000
SICOG$12,969
SEICAA - BINGHAM COUNTY$12,000
BINGHAM CRISIS CENTER$11,500
BINGHAM COUNTY SENIOR CENTER$11,500
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB PORTNEUF VALLEY$10,524
Individual grant recipient$10,240
THE CENTER FOR HOPE$10,000
SENIOR ACTIVITY CENTER$10,000
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 26 repeat orgs$101k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
6

Total granted

$2.0M
$84k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+25%

Still filing today

50%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
Human ServicesCrime & LegalFood & NutritionHealthYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FS
    FAMILY SERVICES ALLIANCE
    7× · 2018–2025 · $200k · revenue +13%
  • PF
    Pocatello Free Clinic
    6× · 2018–2025 · $174k · revenue +582%
  • AF
    AID FOR FRIENDS INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $145k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • CL
    COVID LOCAL FUNDING
    one grant, 2021 · $41k
  • CO
    CITY OF POCATELLO - OUTDORR REC
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
  • AA
    AREA AGENCY ON AGING
    one grant, 2021 · $9k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Senior Citizens Community Center Inc

Providing nutritional services through congregational and home delivered meals to the elderly and other special interest services.

Human Services
2
Rural Idaho & Mountain West Primary Care
Health
3
Indigenous Idaho Alliance Inc
Civil Rights
4
Gem County Senior Community Center Corporation

To provide nutritious meals and social activities at the center as well as home delivered meals and transportation for seniors

Human Services
5
Third District Guardian Ad Litem Program

Provide guardian ad litem services in child protection cases for the third judicial district of the state of idaho

Crime & Legal
6
Senior Citizens Dollar a Month Club

To improve and promote the general welfare of those 60 years of age and older, and those with disabilities or otherwise unable to care for themselves. Primarily to provide meals to seniors.

Human Services
7
Minidoka County Senior Center Inc

To provide balanced nutritious noon meals for senior citizens in Minidoka County ID

Human Services
8
Idaho Operation Lifesaver
—
9
Aberdeen Senior Citizens of Bingham County Inc

We serve the senior citizens of Southern Bingham County, and the Citizens of Aberdeen, Idaho Meals on Wheels and congregate meals onsite.

Human Services
10
Bear Lake Senior Citizens Inc

Bear lake senior citizens sole purpose is to provide nutritional services, transportation services, and informational and referral services to senior citizens living in bear lake county under title iii of the older american act.

Human Services
11
Meridian Area Senior Citizens Association

The program provides transportation, outreach services, meals, and recreational programs to the community's elderly citizens. The program serves more than 21,000 senior citizens in Meridian, Idaho. Seniors are transported for medical care,…

Human Services
12
Jackson County Council On Aging

Provide services to local seniors to improve their quality of life and assist them in remaining in their homes

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oneida Crisis Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Heart 2 Hand Bingham Food Pantry Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SEICAA MEALS ON WHEELS: $229,524 · OtherSEICAA MEALS ON WHEELSBRIGHT TOMORROWS: $192,636 · OtherBRIGHT TOMORROWSPocatello Free Clinic: $174,391 · OtherPocatello Free ClinicIndividual grant recipient: $90,676 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSEICAA - BINGHAM COUNTY: $71,400 · OtherSEICAA - BINGHAM COUNTYAID FOR FRIENDS (NEW FACILITY): $67,985 · OtherAID FOR FRIENDS (NEW FACILITY)BINGHAM CRISIS CENTER: $57,300 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $53,036 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $50,168 · Other+13 more: $253,971 · Other+13 moreFAMILY SERVICES ALLIANCE: $199,924 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICES ALLIANC…AID FOR FRIENDS INC: $145,124 · Human ServicesAID FOR FRIENDS INCSHELLEY AREA SENIOR CITIZENS INC: $47,124 · Human ServicesSHELLEY AREA SENIOR CIT…SENIOR ACTIVITY CENTER INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesSENIOR ACTIVITY CENTER …6TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT CASA PRO: $119,993 · Crime & Legal6TH JUDICI…ONEIDA CRISIS CENTER INC: $58,229 · Crime & LegalONEIDA CRI…IDAHO LEGAL AID SERVICES INC IDAHO LEGAL AID SERVICES INC: $16,000 · Crime & LegalIDAHO LEGA…IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE: $80,063 · Food & NutritionHEART 2 HAND BINGHAM FOOD PANTRY INC: $6,523 · Food & NutritionHEALTH WEST INC: $76,589 · HealthSOUTHEAST IDAHO COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENT INC: $51,227 · Community ImprovementGRAND TETON COUNCIL OF THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC: $7,200 · Youth Development
Other$1,241,087Human Services$422,172Crime & Legal$194,222Food & Nutrition$86,586Health$76,589Community Improvement$51,227Youth Development$7,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFAMILY SERVICES ALLIANCE: $199,924 over 7y, 6.0% of budgetBRIGHT TOMORROWS: $192,636 over 7y, 8.5% of budgetPocatello Free Clinic: $174,391 over 6y, 8.0% of budgetAID FOR FRIENDS INC: $145,124 over 7y, 4.7% of budget6TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT CASA PRO: $119,993 over 6y, 10% of budgetIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE: $80,063 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTH WEST INC: $76,589 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetONEIDA CRISIS CENTER INC: $58,229 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetSOUTHEAST IDAHO COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENT INC: $51,227 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSHELLEY AREA SENIOR CITIZENS INC: $47,124 over 6y, 8.4% of budgetBINGHAM COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS CENT: $33,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetSENIOR ACTIVITY CENTER INC: $30,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetGRAND TETON COUNCIL OF THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC: $7,200 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCAMP FIRE USA GEM STATE COUNCIL INC: $5,950 over 1y, 4.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICES ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHT TOMORROWS ↗
  • Who funds Pocatello Free Clinic ↗
  • Who funds AID FOR FRIENDS INC ↗
  • Who funds 6TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT CASA PRO ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH WEST INC ↗
  • Who funds ONEIDA CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHEAST IDAHO COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds SHELLEY AREA SENIOR CITIZENS INC ↗
  • Who funds BINGHAM COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS CENT ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR ACTIVITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO LEGAL AID SERVICES INC IDAHO LEGAL AID SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds GRAND TETON COUNCIL OF THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds HEART 2 HAND BINGHAM FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP FIRE USA GEM STATE COUNCIL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Idaho Community Found…Idaho Foodbank Wareho…The Allstate Foundati…Amazonsmile Foundation
Idaho Community Foundation IncID31.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Idaho Foodbank Warehouse · The Allstate Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Southeastern Idaho funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Southeastern Idaho. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Southeastern Idaho’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home