Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

United Way of Rome & Western Oneida County Inc

Raise funds through the general campaign to distribute to various nonprofit agencies.

$167k
Granted FY2018
11
Grants FY2018
1
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What you fund
0172% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172018.

Human Services$167kCrime & Legal$22kFood & Nutrition$20kPhilanthropy$18kHousing & Shelter$10kOther$91k
02FY2018 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 11 grants below total $151,299 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $167,313 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $16,014 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k5 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $108k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTER FOR FAMILY LIFE AND RECOVERY$27,900
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF SYRACUSE$21,452
SALVATION ARMY$19,394
SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL OF ROME$18,824
ABRAHAM HOUSE$10,000
CAMDEN AREA FOOD PANTRY$10,000
LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF MID-NEW YORK INC$9,975
CLUSTER 13$9,554
MOHAWK VALLEY COMMUNITY$9,460
PROJECT FIBONACCI STEAM$7,500
YMCA-WCC OF ROME NY INC$7,240
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $167k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL OF ROME: $34k → 16%SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL OF ROME: $19k → 16%YMCA-WCC OF ROME NY INC: $12k → 16%YMCA-WCC OF ROME NY INC: $7k → 16%AMERICAN RED CROSS ROME CHAPTER: $5k → 16%CENTER FOR FAMILY LIFE AND RECOVERY: $28k → 16%CENTER FOR FAMILY LIFE AND RECOVERY: $26k → 16%MOHAWK VALLEY COMMUNITY: $9k → 16%MOHAWK VALLEY COMMUNITY: $9k → 16%ABRAHAM HOUSE: $10k → 16%YMCA OF THE MOHAWK VALLEY: $8k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$276k · 8 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +46% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
2

Total granted

$276k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+46%

Still filing today

75%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
Human ServicesCrime & LegalFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CENTER FOR FAMILY LIFE AND RECOVERY INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $54k · revenue +47%
  • SC
    SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL OF ROME NY INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $52k · revenue +57%
  • LA
    LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF MID-NEW YORK INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $22k · revenue +104%

Funded once

  • YO
    YWCA OF THE MOHAWK VALLEYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +43%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +46%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Young Women's Christian Association of Yonkers

Ywca is dedicated to empowering women and promoting peace, health, justice, freedom and dignity for all.

2
The Ywca of Western New York Inc

The organization provides child care, housing, job training, health and wellness, and leadership development programs, as well as advocacy on racial justice and women's issues.

Human Services
3
Ny Community Fridge Corp

Using the power of volunteers and community partnerships to expand dignified access to food in the heart of disadvantaged communities.

Food & Nutrition
4
Apropos Housing Opportunities and Mgmt Enterprises Inc

A-home is a not-for-profit organization that strengthens northern westchester neighborhoods by providing residents a safe and affordable place to live.

Housing & Shelter
5
Jewish Home of Central New York Senior Apartments Inc

Jewish home of central new york senior apartment's mission is to assure maximum independence and dignity offering a broad range of the highest quality of health, residential and community services. jewish home of central new york senior…

Housing & Shelter
6
Cayuga Medical Associates Pc

Cayuga Medical Associates, as a member of Cayuga Health System, will remain the region's leading healthcare system, and most trusted driver of integrated health services, together with valued partners. We empower our people and employ our…

Health
7
Catholic Charities of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Syracuse Ny

Catholic charities of the roman catholic diocese of syracuse, ny operates throughout the diocese from area offices located in the following counties: onondaga, oneida/madison, oswego, cortland, broome and chenango. catholic charities of…

Human Services
8
Wyoming County Community Action Inc

To improve the quality of life for all residents of its primary service areas by focusing on meeting the needs of the low-income and disadvantaged population, and to promote the personal and family growth of its constituents as they move…

Community Improvement
9
Catholic Charities Community Services Archdiocese of New York

Catholic charities community services seeks to provide holistic human services that respond to ongoing and emerging needs of new yorkers of all religions. our board, staff, and volunteers commit to developing and effectively stewarding…

10
Cidny - Independent Living Services Inc

Home care services (under contract with various mco organizations)

Community Improvement
11
Home Care Association of New York State Inc

To promote and enhance the quality and accessibility of health care and support at home.

Community Improvement
12
Toomey Residential and Community Services Corp

Our mission is to help individuals achieve their highest level of capability and increase opportunities for their future success. we are committed to person-centered, family focused services.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mohawk Valley Community Action Agency Inc and the most unlike its peers is Camden Area Food Pantry Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CENTER FOR FAMILY LIFE AND RECOVERY INC — $53,887 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR FAMILY LIFE AND RECOVERY INCSENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL OF ROME NY INC — $52,408 · Human ServicesSENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL OF ROME NY INCYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN AND WOMEN'S COMMUNITY CENTER OF ROME N — $19,039 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN AND WOMEN'S COMMUNITY CENTER OF ROME…MOHAWK VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC — $18,920 · Human ServicesMOHAWK VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INCCOMFORT HOUSE INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesCOMFORT HOUSE INCYWCA OF THE MOHAWK VALLEY — $7,977 · Human Services+1 more — $5,090 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ONEIDA & MADISON COUNTIES — $46,242 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ONEIDA & …THE SALVATION ARMY — $44,731 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYLEGAL AID SOCIETY OF MID-NEW YORK INC — $21,594 · Crime & LegalCAMDEN AREA FOOD PANTRY INC — $19,554 · Food & NutritionTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HERKIMER AND ONEIDA COUNTIES INC — $17,500 · PhilanthropyCLUSTER 13 — $9,554 · Housing & Shelter
Human Services$167,321Other$90,973Crime & Legal$21,594Food & Nutrition$19,554Philanthropy$17,500Housing & Shelter$9,554

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCENTER FOR FAMILY LIFE AND RECOVERY INC — $53,887 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetSENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL OF ROME NY INC — $52,408 over 3y, 9.2% of budgetLEGAL AID SOCIETY OF MID-NEW YORK INC — $21,594 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCAMDEN AREA FOOD PANTRY INC — $19,554 over 3y, 13% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN AND WOMEN'S COMMUNITY CENTER OF ROME N — $19,039 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMOHAWK VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC — $18,920 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HERKIMER AND ONEIDA COUNTIES INC — $17,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOMFORT HOUSE INC — $10,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetCLUSTER 13 — $9,554 over 2y, 10% of budgetYWCA OF THE MOHAWK VALLEY — $7,977 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $5,090 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Herkimer and Oneida Counties IncNY24× affinity9 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Herkimer and Oneida Counties Inc · Rome Community Foundation · The James H Wurz Jr and Edward T Wurz Sr Foundation · United Way of the Mohawk Valley Inc · Indium Corporation and Macartney Family Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization United Way of Rome & Western Oneida County Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to United Way of Rome & Western Oneida County Inc?

    Find your warmest path to United Way of Rome & Western Oneida County Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2021) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2018, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph