· Public charity
United Way of Moore County Inc
Centralized funding agency which provided funds for other organizations.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k6 grants · $41k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $128k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $437k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MEALS ON WHEELS | $137,402 |
| Individual grant recipient | $94,559 |
| MOORE COUNTY SENIOR CENTER INC | $80,000 |
| DUMAS DISCOVERY CENTER INC | $65,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $60,000 |
| FREEDOM CENTER | $35,000 |
| CACTUS NAZARENE MINISTRY CENTER | $25,000 |
| THE REFUGE | $17,000 |
| PANHANDLE CHILDRENS FOUNDATION | $15,380 |
| DUMAS EDUCATION & SOCIAL MINISTRIES | $15,380 |
| THE BRIDGE | $10,000 |
| CASA 69 INC | $10,000 |
| BOY SCOUTS - GOLDEN SPREAD COUNCIL | $8,682 |
| MOORE COUNTY GIRLS TRUST | $8,000 |
| EPILEPSY FOUNDATION WEST TEXAS | $7,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 4% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.
20 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- MOMEALS ON WHEELS9× · 2017–2025 · $982k · revenue +23% · 92% of their budget
- MCMOORE COUNTY SENIOR CENTER INC9× · 2017–2025 · $522k · revenue +73% · 29% of their budget
- RCREFUGE CORPORATION9× · 2017–2025 · $111k · revenue +28%
Funded once
- DADUMAS AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAMone grant, 2017 · $35k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide meals on wheels, congregate meals, and recreational facility for elderly and low income persons of dawson county texas.
A state of texas licensed foster care and adoption agency that identifies and provides approved healing foster homes for children.
To provide all abused and neglected children with a voice in the court process.
Child abuse victim assistance
Advocacy for abused and neglectedchildren
To provide assistance to the elderly and qualified needy with delivery of meals to their residences in moore county, texas.
Provide nourishing meals to people who are disabled, aged and/or ill.
To advocate for safe, permanent, and nuturing homes for abused and neglected children by providing specially selected and trained community volunteers.
None
Advocacy for abused and neglected children
We are organized to recruit, coordinate, and train volunteers to solely represent the best interests of children in spencer county, in who are abused, negleted, dependent, or delinquent and who are referred by the court.
How this is measured
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
- Who funds MOORE COUNTY SENIOR CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds DUMAS DISCOVERY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM CENTER TEXAS ↗
- Who funds PANHANDLE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds REFUGE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds GOLDEN SPREAD COUNCIL INC 562 OF THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds CASA 69TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT INC ↗
- Who funds DUMAS EDUCATION AND SOCIAL MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds THE BRIDGE ↗
- Who funds Cactus Nazarene Ministry Center ↗
- Who funds DUMAS AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Amarillo Area Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization United Way of Moore County Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Moore County Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on United Way of Moore County’s filings →