Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of Mifflin-Juniata

UNITED WAY OF MIFFLIN-JUNIATA works to improve people's lives by mobilizing the caring power of the community through program and initiatives that address local needs conering education, health, and income.

$252k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$522kYouth Development$477kEducation$339kHuman Services$215kPublic Safety & Disaster$131kCrime & Legal$66kEnvironment$51kRecreation & Sports$37k
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 15 grants below total $234,140, the rows itemized in this filing. The $252,069 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $17,929 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $220k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$622k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMPASS COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS$30,000
LUMINA CENTER$29,600
ABUSE NETWORK$24,000
MIFFLIN COUNTY LIBRARY$22,000
COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS RC&D$17,000
JUNIATA COUNTY LIBRARY$15,000
NUVISIONS$15,000
BOB PERKS CANCER FUND$15,000
JUNIATA COUNCIL-BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$12,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$10,740
CROSSROADS PREGNANCY CENTER$10,000
PAUL W DELAUTER YOUTH CENTER$10,000
JUNIATA VALLEY YMCA$10,000
MIDPENN LEGAL SERVICES$7,300
CHRISTIAN RETREAT CENTER$6,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $112k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JUNIATA VALLEY YMCA: $10k → 15%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $27k → 16%JUNIATA VALLEY YMCA: $10k → 15%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $26k → 16%JUNIATA VALLEY YMCA: $10k → 15%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $25k → 16%DELAUTER YOUTH CENTER: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 19% of United Way of Mifflin-Juniata’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

United Way of Mifflin-Juniatalessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 15 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
1

Total granted

$1.8M
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
0%

Still filing today

80%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentEmploymentCrime & LegalEnvironmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    COMPASS COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $356k · revenue +29%
  • LU
    LEWISTOWN UNITED MINISTRIES IN NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $258k · revenue +69% · 31% of their budget
  • TA
    THE ABUSE NETWORK INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $215k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • CR
    CHRISTIAN RETREAT CENTER ALLEGHENY CONFERENCE BIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2025 · $7k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dalton Community Library

Public lending library

—
2
Center for Community Action

The center for community action is the designated lead poverty agency for blair, bedford, fulton, and huntingdon counties in central pennsylvania and exists to provide a broad spectrum of services to the low income residents of the…

Housing & Shelter
3
Connections Work

Connections work changes lives and improves communities by providing services and supports to individuals seeking pathways to success.

—
4
Valley Community Library

Public lending library

—
5
Center for Community Resources Inc

To coordinate services among private and government agencies for specialized populations to ensure service continuity, reduce duplication, and assist individuals and families in accessing appropriate mental health, intellectual…

Health
6
Abington Community Library Association

Public lending library

—
7
Community Counseling Center of Mercer County

To help individuals and families lead healthy and fulfilling lives.

Health
8
Taylor Community Library Association

Public lending library

—
9
Adams County Children's Advocacy Center

To meet the needs of children and families in our community by providing a community based, child focused center that facilitates a compassionate multidisciplinary approach to the prevention, identification, investigation, prosecution and…

Crime & Legal
10
Hamlin Community Library

Public lending library

Education
11
Penn Hills Library

A welcoming community center that provides information and equitable access to space, collections, materials, programs and services that enrich the quality of life and facilitate lifelong learning.

Education
12
Adamstown Area Library

The mission of the adamstown library is to maintain and improve the quality of life in our community by providing access to cultural, intellectual, and informational resources and programs to promote life-long learning for all ages. the…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centre County Youth Service Bureau; the most unlike its peers is Lewistown United Ministries in Neighborhood Action. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMPASS COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS: $356,300 · OtherCOMPASS COMMUNITY CONNECTIONSTHE ABUSE NETWORK INC: $214,900 · OtherTHE ABUSE NETWORK INCMIFFLIN COUNTY LIBRARY ASSOCIATION: $185,000 · OtherMIFFLIN COUNTY LIBRARY ASSOCIATIONJUNIATA COUNTY LIBRARY INC: $142,300 · OtherJUNIATA COUNTY LIBRARY INCAMERICAN RED CROSS: $131,239 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA JUNIATA VALLEY COUNCIL: $114,800 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA JUNIATA VALLEY COUNCILCROSSROADS PREGNANCY CENTER: $54,243 · Other+1 more: $22,500 · OtherLEWISTOWN UNITED MINISTRIES IN NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION: $257,850 · Youth DevelopmentLEWISTOWN UNITE…CENTRE COUNTY YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU: $82,167 · Human ServicesCENTRE CO…BOB PERKS CANCER ASSISTANCE FUND: $39,000 · Human ServicesBOB PERKS…YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF JUNIATA VALLEY INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN…NUVISIONS CENTER: $72,338 · EmploymentMIDPENN LEGAL SERVICES: $66,400 · Crime & LegalCOMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL: $63,000 · EnvironmentCHRISTIAN RETREAT CENTER ALLEGHENY CONFERENCE BIC CHURCH: $6,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,221,282Youth Development$257,850Human Services$151,167Employment$72,338Crime & Legal$66,400Environment$63,000Recreation & Sports$6,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMPASS COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS: $356,300 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetLEWISTOWN UNITED MINISTRIES IN NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION: $257,850 over 9y, 31% of budgetTHE ABUSE NETWORK INC: $214,900 over 9y, 3.5% of budgetMIFFLIN COUNTY LIBRARY ASSOCIATION: $185,000 over 9y, 4.6% of budgetJUNIATA COUNTY LIBRARY INC: $142,300 over 9y, 7.4% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA JUNIATA VALLEY COUNCIL: $114,800 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetCENTRE COUNTY YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU: $82,167 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetNUVISIONS CENTER: $72,338 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetMIDPENN LEGAL SERVICES: $66,400 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL: $63,000 over 4y, 21% of budgetBOB PERKS CANCER ASSISTANCE FUND: $39,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF JUNIATA VALLEY INC: $30,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetCHRISTIAN RETREAT CENTER ALLEGHENY CONFERENCE BIC CHURCH: $6,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMPASS COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS ↗
  • Who funds LEWISTOWN UNITED MINISTRIES IN NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION ↗
  • Who funds THE ABUSE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds MIFFLIN COUNTY LIBRARY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds JUNIATA COUNTY LIBRARY INC ↗
  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA JUNIATA VALLEY COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds CENTRE COUNTY YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU ↗
  • Who funds NUVISIONS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MIDPENN LEGAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds BOB PERKS CANCER ASSISTANCE FUND ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF JUNIATA VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN RETREAT CENTER ALLEGHENY CONFERENCE BIC CHURCH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Centre Foundation IncPA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Centre Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Mifflin-Juniata funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Mifflin-Juniata. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Mifflin-Juniata’s filings →

    More from the funding graph